Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights

Whilst the legal and economic challenges presented by Brexit are gradually becoming more evident, observations and recommendations are already being drawn from consequences of a “ no deal scenario” and particularly the possibilities of entering into a variant of a Free Trade Agreement which should,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ojo, Marianne
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/1/MPRA_paper_93812.pdf
id ftmpra:oai::93812
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmpra:oai::93812 2023-05-15T16:52:37+02:00 Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights Ojo, Marianne 2019-05 application/pdf https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/ https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/1/MPRA_paper_93812.pdf en eng https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/1/MPRA_paper_93812.pdf Ojo, Marianne (2019): Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights. F1 - Trade F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions F18 - Trade and Environment G1 - General Financial Markets G14 - Information and Market Efficiency Event Studies Insider Trading G18 - Government Policy and Regulation G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance K2 - Regulation and Business Law MPRA Paper NonPeerReviewed 2019 ftmpra 2023-04-09T04:59:58Z Whilst the legal and economic challenges presented by Brexit are gradually becoming more evident, observations and recommendations are already being drawn from consequences of a “ no deal scenario” and particularly the possibilities of entering into a variant of a Free Trade Agreement which should, prevent a “no deal” situation. Such a Free Trade Agreement existing between the current 28 EU Member States and the three EEA European Free Trade Association (EFTA) States Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway (EEA Internal Market) This paper, amongst other objectives, is aimed at highlighting such proposals which have been put forward to avert a “no deal scenario”. It is obvious that change – and more specifically, fundamental legislative, regulatory overhauls, will require not only the incorporation of expertise from different fields, but also time consuming and costly resources to address the demands of the transitional and implementation periods of such legislatively transformed landscapes. Certainly, a gradual process of incorporating and adapting to new regulatory and legislative changes and environments – and particularly in respect of economically sensitive related matters, would require not only thorough and dedicated observatory and monitoring periods, but also one which facilitates and encourages a process of greater democratic accountability and transparency to be incorporated into the legislative processes. Even though Brexit has generated a great degree of economic uncertainty – which has in turn presented challenges – as well as consequences, it also presents opportunities for new actors to engage and influence vital decision making aspects in areas which particularly revolve around information technology, sustainable development, innovation – as well hybrid financial instruments and volatile mediums which are embodied and personified by crypto currencies, derivatives and other complex financial instruments and mediums of exchange - all of which are reflective of a rapidly changing and evolving financial ... Report Iceland Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA - Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich) Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA - Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich)
op_collection_id ftmpra
language English
topic F1 - Trade
F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
F18 - Trade and Environment
G1 - General Financial Markets
G14 - Information and Market Efficiency
Event Studies
Insider Trading
G18 - Government Policy and Regulation
G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance
K2 - Regulation and Business Law
spellingShingle F1 - Trade
F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
F18 - Trade and Environment
G1 - General Financial Markets
G14 - Information and Market Efficiency
Event Studies
Insider Trading
G18 - Government Policy and Regulation
G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance
K2 - Regulation and Business Law
Ojo, Marianne
Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights
topic_facet F1 - Trade
F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
F18 - Trade and Environment
G1 - General Financial Markets
G14 - Information and Market Efficiency
Event Studies
Insider Trading
G18 - Government Policy and Regulation
G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance
K2 - Regulation and Business Law
description Whilst the legal and economic challenges presented by Brexit are gradually becoming more evident, observations and recommendations are already being drawn from consequences of a “ no deal scenario” and particularly the possibilities of entering into a variant of a Free Trade Agreement which should, prevent a “no deal” situation. Such a Free Trade Agreement existing between the current 28 EU Member States and the three EEA European Free Trade Association (EFTA) States Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway (EEA Internal Market) This paper, amongst other objectives, is aimed at highlighting such proposals which have been put forward to avert a “no deal scenario”. It is obvious that change – and more specifically, fundamental legislative, regulatory overhauls, will require not only the incorporation of expertise from different fields, but also time consuming and costly resources to address the demands of the transitional and implementation periods of such legislatively transformed landscapes. Certainly, a gradual process of incorporating and adapting to new regulatory and legislative changes and environments – and particularly in respect of economically sensitive related matters, would require not only thorough and dedicated observatory and monitoring periods, but also one which facilitates and encourages a process of greater democratic accountability and transparency to be incorporated into the legislative processes. Even though Brexit has generated a great degree of economic uncertainty – which has in turn presented challenges – as well as consequences, it also presents opportunities for new actors to engage and influence vital decision making aspects in areas which particularly revolve around information technology, sustainable development, innovation – as well hybrid financial instruments and volatile mediums which are embodied and personified by crypto currencies, derivatives and other complex financial instruments and mediums of exchange - all of which are reflective of a rapidly changing and evolving financial ...
format Report
author Ojo, Marianne
author_facet Ojo, Marianne
author_sort Ojo, Marianne
title Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights
title_short Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights
title_full Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights
title_fullStr Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights
title_full_unstemmed Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights
title_sort avoiding a “no deal” scenario: free trade agreements, citizenship and economic rights
publishDate 2019
url https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/1/MPRA_paper_93812.pdf
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93812/1/MPRA_paper_93812.pdf
Ojo, Marianne (2019): Avoiding a “No Deal” Scenario: Free Trade Agreements, Citizenship and Economic Rights.
_version_ 1766042982230786048