“They’d Lost Everything and Were Not Qualified”: The Legacy of the Unmet Education Promises Made in Treaty 7

This paper provides an analysis of the education promises made in Treaty 7 by the Crown and federal government of Canada. Signed on the banks of the Bow River at Blackfoot Crossing in 1877, the treaty was desired by both government officials and Indigenous Nations in what is now southern Alberta—the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR)
Main Author: Little, Tarisa Dawn
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Mount Royal University in Calgary, Alberta 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/mruhr/article/view/191
https://doi.org/10.29173/mruhr191
id ftmountroyaluni:oai:ualberta_jrnl_mrujs:article/191
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmountroyaluni:oai:ualberta_jrnl_mrujs:article/191 2024-09-15T18:06:34+00:00 “They’d Lost Everything and Were Not Qualified”: The Legacy of the Unmet Education Promises Made in Treaty 7 Little, Tarisa Dawn 2015-11-19 application/pdf https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/mruhr/article/view/191 https://doi.org/10.29173/mruhr191 eng eng Mount Royal University in Calgary, Alberta https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/mruhr/article/view/191/157 https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/mruhr/article/view/191 doi:10.29173/mruhr191 Copyright (c) 2015 Tarisa Dawn Little https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Mount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR); Vol. 3 (2015) 2562-4733 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2015 ftmountroyaluni https://doi.org/10.29173/mruhr191 2024-06-25T03:02:45Z This paper provides an analysis of the education promises made in Treaty 7 by the Crown and federal government of Canada. Signed on the banks of the Bow River at Blackfoot Crossing in 1877, the treaty was desired by both government officials and Indigenous Nations in what is now southern Alberta—the Tsuu T’ina, the Stoney Nakoda, and the Blackfoot Confederacy: Siksika, Piikani, Kainai. As this thesis will demonstrate though, Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples viewed the meaning of the treaty in conflicting ways. This paper focuses on the creation and management of the schools in the Treaty 7 territories from 1877, the year Treaty 7 was “signed”, to 1923, the year in which industrial and boarding schools were merged to form the new category of “residential school” and the decade in which government policy for schools for Indigenous peoples began to take a new, less ambitious direction. The implementation of schools by the Department of Indian Affairs and their church partners, the type of education that was being offered to First Nations peoples, as well as First Nations responses will be examined. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations Nakoda stoney Mount Royal University: MRU Journal System Mount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR) 3
institution Open Polar
collection Mount Royal University: MRU Journal System
op_collection_id ftmountroyaluni
language English
description This paper provides an analysis of the education promises made in Treaty 7 by the Crown and federal government of Canada. Signed on the banks of the Bow River at Blackfoot Crossing in 1877, the treaty was desired by both government officials and Indigenous Nations in what is now southern Alberta—the Tsuu T’ina, the Stoney Nakoda, and the Blackfoot Confederacy: Siksika, Piikani, Kainai. As this thesis will demonstrate though, Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples viewed the meaning of the treaty in conflicting ways. This paper focuses on the creation and management of the schools in the Treaty 7 territories from 1877, the year Treaty 7 was “signed”, to 1923, the year in which industrial and boarding schools were merged to form the new category of “residential school” and the decade in which government policy for schools for Indigenous peoples began to take a new, less ambitious direction. The implementation of schools by the Department of Indian Affairs and their church partners, the type of education that was being offered to First Nations peoples, as well as First Nations responses will be examined.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Little, Tarisa Dawn
spellingShingle Little, Tarisa Dawn
“They’d Lost Everything and Were Not Qualified”: The Legacy of the Unmet Education Promises Made in Treaty 7
author_facet Little, Tarisa Dawn
author_sort Little, Tarisa Dawn
title “They’d Lost Everything and Were Not Qualified”: The Legacy of the Unmet Education Promises Made in Treaty 7
title_short “They’d Lost Everything and Were Not Qualified”: The Legacy of the Unmet Education Promises Made in Treaty 7
title_full “They’d Lost Everything and Were Not Qualified”: The Legacy of the Unmet Education Promises Made in Treaty 7
title_fullStr “They’d Lost Everything and Were Not Qualified”: The Legacy of the Unmet Education Promises Made in Treaty 7
title_full_unstemmed “They’d Lost Everything and Were Not Qualified”: The Legacy of the Unmet Education Promises Made in Treaty 7
title_sort “they’d lost everything and were not qualified”: the legacy of the unmet education promises made in treaty 7
publisher Mount Royal University in Calgary, Alberta
publishDate 2015
url https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/mruhr/article/view/191
https://doi.org/10.29173/mruhr191
genre First Nations
Nakoda
stoney
genre_facet First Nations
Nakoda
stoney
op_source Mount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR); Vol. 3 (2015)
2562-4733
op_relation https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/mruhr/article/view/191/157
https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/mruhr/article/view/191
doi:10.29173/mruhr191
op_rights Copyright (c) 2015 Tarisa Dawn Little
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.29173/mruhr191
container_title Mount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR)
container_volume 3
_version_ 1810443981942685696