Fundamental differences between Arctic and Antarctic ozone depletion

Antarctic ozone depletion is associated with enhanced chlorine from anthropogenic chlorofluorocarbons and heterogeneous chemistry under cold conditions. The deep Antarctic “hole” contrasts with the generally weaker depletions observed in the warmer Arctic. An unusually cold Arctic stratospheric seas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Main Authors: Solomon, Susan, Haskins, Jessica, Ivy, Diane J., Min, Flora
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97918
id ftmit:oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/97918
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmit:oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/97918 2023-06-11T04:04:26+02:00 Fundamental differences between Arctic and Antarctic ozone depletion Solomon, Susan Haskins, Jessica Ivy, Diane J. Min, Flora Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Solomon, Susan Haskins, Jessica Ivy, Diane J. Min, Flora 2013-10 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97918 en_US eng National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319307111 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 0027-8424 1091-6490 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97918 Solomon, S., J. Haskins, D. J. Ivy, and F. Min. “Fundamental Differences Between Arctic and Antarctic Ozone Depletion.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no. 17 (April 14, 2014): 6220–6225. orcid:0000-0002-2020-7581 Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. PNAS Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 2013 ftmit https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319307111 2023-05-29T08:26:50Z Antarctic ozone depletion is associated with enhanced chlorine from anthropogenic chlorofluorocarbons and heterogeneous chemistry under cold conditions. The deep Antarctic “hole” contrasts with the generally weaker depletions observed in the warmer Arctic. An unusually cold Arctic stratospheric season occurred in 2011, raising the question of how the Arctic ozone chemistry in that year compares with others. We show that the averaged depletions near 20 km across the cold part of each pole are deeper in Antarctica than in the Arctic for all years, although 2011 Arctic values do rival those seen in less-depleted years in Antarctica. We focus not only on averages but also on extremes, to address whether or not Arctic ozone depletion can be as extreme as that observed in the Antarctic. This information provides unique insights into the contrasts between Arctic and Antarctic ozone chemistry. We show that extreme Antarctic ozone minima fall to or below 0.1 parts per million by volume (ppmv) at 18 and 20 km (about 70 and 50 mbar) whereas the lowest Arctic ozone values are about 0.5 ppmv at these altitudes. At a higher altitude of 24 km (30-mbar level), no Arctic data below about 2 ppmv have been observed, including in 2011, in contrast to values more than an order of magnitude lower in Antarctica. The data show that the lowest ozone values are associated with temperatures below −80 °C to −85 °C depending upon altitude, and are closely associated with reduced gaseous nitric acid concentrations due to uptake and/or sedimentation in polar stratospheric cloud particles. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Arctic Arctic DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Arctic Antarctic The Antarctic Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 17 6220 6225
institution Open Polar
collection DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
op_collection_id ftmit
language English
description Antarctic ozone depletion is associated with enhanced chlorine from anthropogenic chlorofluorocarbons and heterogeneous chemistry under cold conditions. The deep Antarctic “hole” contrasts with the generally weaker depletions observed in the warmer Arctic. An unusually cold Arctic stratospheric season occurred in 2011, raising the question of how the Arctic ozone chemistry in that year compares with others. We show that the averaged depletions near 20 km across the cold part of each pole are deeper in Antarctica than in the Arctic for all years, although 2011 Arctic values do rival those seen in less-depleted years in Antarctica. We focus not only on averages but also on extremes, to address whether or not Arctic ozone depletion can be as extreme as that observed in the Antarctic. This information provides unique insights into the contrasts between Arctic and Antarctic ozone chemistry. We show that extreme Antarctic ozone minima fall to or below 0.1 parts per million by volume (ppmv) at 18 and 20 km (about 70 and 50 mbar) whereas the lowest Arctic ozone values are about 0.5 ppmv at these altitudes. At a higher altitude of 24 km (30-mbar level), no Arctic data below about 2 ppmv have been observed, including in 2011, in contrast to values more than an order of magnitude lower in Antarctica. The data show that the lowest ozone values are associated with temperatures below −80 °C to −85 °C depending upon altitude, and are closely associated with reduced gaseous nitric acid concentrations due to uptake and/or sedimentation in polar stratospheric cloud particles.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Solomon, Susan
Haskins, Jessica
Ivy, Diane J.
Min, Flora
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Solomon, Susan
Haskins, Jessica
Ivy, Diane J.
Min, Flora
spellingShingle Solomon, Susan
Haskins, Jessica
Ivy, Diane J.
Min, Flora
Fundamental differences between Arctic and Antarctic ozone depletion
author_facet Solomon, Susan
Haskins, Jessica
Ivy, Diane J.
Min, Flora
author_sort Solomon, Susan
title Fundamental differences between Arctic and Antarctic ozone depletion
title_short Fundamental differences between Arctic and Antarctic ozone depletion
title_full Fundamental differences between Arctic and Antarctic ozone depletion
title_fullStr Fundamental differences between Arctic and Antarctic ozone depletion
title_full_unstemmed Fundamental differences between Arctic and Antarctic ozone depletion
title_sort fundamental differences between arctic and antarctic ozone depletion
publisher National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97918
geographic Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Arctic
Arctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Arctic
Arctic
op_source PNAS
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319307111
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
0027-8424
1091-6490
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97918
Solomon, S., J. Haskins, D. J. Ivy, and F. Min. “Fundamental Differences Between Arctic and Antarctic Ozone Depletion.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no. 17 (April 14, 2014): 6220–6225.
orcid:0000-0002-2020-7581
op_rights Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319307111
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
container_volume 111
container_issue 17
container_start_page 6220
op_container_end_page 6225
_version_ 1768387881912500224