Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity

Many of the next generation of global climate models will include aerosol schemes which explicitly simulate the microphysical processes that determine the particle size distribution. These models enable aerosol optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations to be determined by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Author: Ridley, David Andrew
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus GmbH 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88010
id ftmit:oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/88010
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmit:oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/88010 2023-06-11T04:09:46+02:00 Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity Ridley, David Andrew Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Ridley, David Andrew 2013-08 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88010 en_US eng Copernicus GmbH http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4679-2014 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 1680-7324 1680-7316 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88010 Mann, G. W., K. S. Carslaw, C. L. Reddington, K. J. Pringle, M. Schulz, A. Asmi, D. V. Spracklen, et al. “Intercomparison and Evaluation of Global Aerosol Microphysical Properties Among AeroCom Models of a Range of Complexity.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14, no. 9 (May 13, 2014): 4679–4713. orcid:0000-0003-3890-0197 Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Copernicus Publications Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 2013 ftmit https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4679-2014 2023-05-29T08:34:14Z Many of the next generation of global climate models will include aerosol schemes which explicitly simulate the microphysical processes that determine the particle size distribution. These models enable aerosol optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations to be determined by fundamental aerosol processes, which should lead to a more physically based simulation of aerosol direct and indirect radiative forcings. This study examines the global variation in particle size distribution simulated by 12 global aerosol microphysics models to quantify model diversity and to identify any common biases against observations. Evaluation against size distribution measurements from a new European network of aerosol supersites shows that the mean model agrees quite well with the observations at many sites on the annual mean, but there are some seasonal biases common to many sites. In particular, at many of these European sites, the accumulation mode number concentration is biased low during winter and Aitken mode concentrations tend to be overestimated in winter and underestimated in summer. At high northern latitudes, the models strongly underpredict Aitken and accumulation particle concentrations compared to the measurements, consistent with previous studies that have highlighted the poor performance of global aerosol models in the Arctic. In the marine boundary layer, the models capture the observed meridional variation in the size distribution, which is dominated by the Aitken mode at high latitudes, with an increasing concentration of accumulation particles with decreasing latitude. Considering vertical profiles, the models reproduce the observed peak in total particle concentrations in the upper troposphere due to new particle formation, although modelled peak concentrations tend to be biased high over Europe. Overall, the multi-model-mean data set simulates the global variation of the particle size distribution with a good degree of skill, suggesting that most of the individual global aerosol ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Arctic Aitken ENVELOPE(-44.516,-44.516,-60.733,-60.733) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14 9 4679 4713
institution Open Polar
collection DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
op_collection_id ftmit
language English
description Many of the next generation of global climate models will include aerosol schemes which explicitly simulate the microphysical processes that determine the particle size distribution. These models enable aerosol optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations to be determined by fundamental aerosol processes, which should lead to a more physically based simulation of aerosol direct and indirect radiative forcings. This study examines the global variation in particle size distribution simulated by 12 global aerosol microphysics models to quantify model diversity and to identify any common biases against observations. Evaluation against size distribution measurements from a new European network of aerosol supersites shows that the mean model agrees quite well with the observations at many sites on the annual mean, but there are some seasonal biases common to many sites. In particular, at many of these European sites, the accumulation mode number concentration is biased low during winter and Aitken mode concentrations tend to be overestimated in winter and underestimated in summer. At high northern latitudes, the models strongly underpredict Aitken and accumulation particle concentrations compared to the measurements, consistent with previous studies that have highlighted the poor performance of global aerosol models in the Arctic. In the marine boundary layer, the models capture the observed meridional variation in the size distribution, which is dominated by the Aitken mode at high latitudes, with an increasing concentration of accumulation particles with decreasing latitude. Considering vertical profiles, the models reproduce the observed peak in total particle concentrations in the upper troposphere due to new particle formation, although modelled peak concentrations tend to be biased high over Europe. Overall, the multi-model-mean data set simulates the global variation of the particle size distribution with a good degree of skill, suggesting that most of the individual global aerosol ...
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Ridley, David Andrew
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ridley, David Andrew
spellingShingle Ridley, David Andrew
Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity
author_facet Ridley, David Andrew
author_sort Ridley, David Andrew
title Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity
title_short Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity
title_full Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity
title_fullStr Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity
title_full_unstemmed Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity
title_sort intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among aerocom models of a range of complexity
publisher Copernicus GmbH
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88010
long_lat ENVELOPE(-44.516,-44.516,-60.733,-60.733)
geographic Arctic
Aitken
geographic_facet Arctic
Aitken
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Copernicus Publications
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4679-2014
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
1680-7324
1680-7316
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88010
Mann, G. W., K. S. Carslaw, C. L. Reddington, K. J. Pringle, M. Schulz, A. Asmi, D. V. Spracklen, et al. “Intercomparison and Evaluation of Global Aerosol Microphysical Properties Among AeroCom Models of a Range of Complexity.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14, no. 9 (May 13, 2014): 4679–4713.
orcid:0000-0003-3890-0197
op_rights Creative Commons Attribution
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4679-2014
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 14
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4679
op_container_end_page 4713
_version_ 1768383746503868416