Patterns of mammal incidents with U.S. civil aircraft

Wildlife collisions with U.S. civil aircraft (hereafter incidents) pose safety and economic concerns. Terrestrial mammals represented only 2.3% of wildlife incidents, but 59% of these incidents caused damage to aircraft. I examined 2,558 incidents in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Nationa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Biondi, Kristin Michele
Other Authors: Dr. Jerrold L. Belant, Dr. James A. Martin, Dr. Guiming Wang, Dr. Travis L. DeVault
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: MSSTATE 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://sun.library.msstate.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-10152012-140843/
Description
Summary:Wildlife collisions with U.S. civil aircraft (hereafter incidents) pose safety and economic concerns. Terrestrial mammals represented only 2.3% of wildlife incidents, but 59% of these incidents caused damage to aircraft. I examined 2,558 incidents in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) National Wildlife Strike Database to characterize and analyze overall mammal incidents by airport type, emphasizing white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ) and bat incidents with U.S. civil aircraft. Mammal incidents caused 5 times greater damage than other wildlife which varied by airport type and appeared associated with species behavior. I provided relative hazard scores to determine which species were most hazardous to aircraft. Relative hazard increased with increasing body mass with mule deer ( O. hemionus ), white-tailed deer and domestic dog ( Canis lupus familiaris ) most hazardous to aircraft. White-tailed deer caused 6 times greater damage than all other wildlife and are hazardous to aircraft. In contrast, bats posed a low hazard to aircraft.