Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves

Wolves, Canis lupus, routinely live in large packs that include unrelated individuals and mature offspring. Studies show that individual wolves that live in large packs suffer reduced foraging returns. Therefore, group hunting and group living (sociality) in wolves is generally thought to be favoure...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal Behaviour
Main Authors: Vucetich, John A., Peterson, Rolf O., Waite, Thomas A.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/5922
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.018
id ftmichigantuniv:oai:digitalcommons.mtu.edu:michigantech-p-25224
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmichigantuniv:oai:digitalcommons.mtu.edu:michigantech-p-25224 2023-05-15T15:50:48+02:00 Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves Vucetich, John A. Peterson, Rolf O. Waite, Thomas A. 2004-06-01T07:00:00Z https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/5922 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.018 unknown Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/5922 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.018 Michigan Tech Publications text 2004 ftmichigantuniv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.018 2022-03-03T18:38:18Z Wolves, Canis lupus, routinely live in large packs that include unrelated individuals and mature offspring. Studies show that individual wolves that live in large packs suffer reduced foraging returns. Therefore, group hunting and group living (sociality) in wolves is generally thought to be favoured by indirect fitness gains accrued through kin-directed altruism. However, we show that kin-directed altruism cannot account for groups that include mature offspring or unrelated individuals. We also present an analysis that incorporates a previously ignored feature of wolf foraging ecology, namely the loss of food to scavenging ravens, Corvus corax. By accounting for this process, we show that individuals in large packs do indeed accrue foraging advantages. In the hypothetical absence of this scavenging pressure, an individual would maximize its rate of prey acquisition, and minimize its risk of energetic shortfall, by foraging with just one other individual. However, incorporating the effect of scavenging by ravens leads to a dramatic increase in the predicted group size. Our analysis indicates that per capita gains are highest in the largest observed packs. The greater food-sharing costs in a larger pack are more than offset by smaller losses to scavengers and increased rates of prey acquisition. Thus, in contrast with previous interpretations, the selfish benefits of social foraging appear to contribute to the maintenance of sociality in wolves after all. We explore whether such benefits favour group living in various social carnivores that hunt large prey and are thus vulnerable to scavenging. © 2004 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Text Canis lupus Michigan Technological University: Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Animal Behaviour 67 6 1117 1126
institution Open Polar
collection Michigan Technological University: Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech
op_collection_id ftmichigantuniv
language unknown
description Wolves, Canis lupus, routinely live in large packs that include unrelated individuals and mature offspring. Studies show that individual wolves that live in large packs suffer reduced foraging returns. Therefore, group hunting and group living (sociality) in wolves is generally thought to be favoured by indirect fitness gains accrued through kin-directed altruism. However, we show that kin-directed altruism cannot account for groups that include mature offspring or unrelated individuals. We also present an analysis that incorporates a previously ignored feature of wolf foraging ecology, namely the loss of food to scavenging ravens, Corvus corax. By accounting for this process, we show that individuals in large packs do indeed accrue foraging advantages. In the hypothetical absence of this scavenging pressure, an individual would maximize its rate of prey acquisition, and minimize its risk of energetic shortfall, by foraging with just one other individual. However, incorporating the effect of scavenging by ravens leads to a dramatic increase in the predicted group size. Our analysis indicates that per capita gains are highest in the largest observed packs. The greater food-sharing costs in a larger pack are more than offset by smaller losses to scavengers and increased rates of prey acquisition. Thus, in contrast with previous interpretations, the selfish benefits of social foraging appear to contribute to the maintenance of sociality in wolves after all. We explore whether such benefits favour group living in various social carnivores that hunt large prey and are thus vulnerable to scavenging. © 2004 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
format Text
author Vucetich, John A.
Peterson, Rolf O.
Waite, Thomas A.
spellingShingle Vucetich, John A.
Peterson, Rolf O.
Waite, Thomas A.
Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves
author_facet Vucetich, John A.
Peterson, Rolf O.
Waite, Thomas A.
author_sort Vucetich, John A.
title Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves
title_short Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves
title_full Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves
title_fullStr Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves
title_full_unstemmed Raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves
title_sort raven scavenging favours group foraging in wolves
publisher Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech
publishDate 2004
url https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/5922
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.018
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source Michigan Tech Publications
op_relation https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/5922
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.018
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.06.018
container_title Animal Behaviour
container_volume 67
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1117
op_container_end_page 1126
_version_ 1766385827978412032