Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database

There are different types of DatabaseManagement System. Each has their own modeland architecture for data storage. In this paper,we compare Data Retrieval efficiency betweenRelational Database Management System(RDBMS) and Object-Relational DatabaseManagement System (ORDBMS), and the DataModel, Data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lwin, May Thet, Tun, Khin Mar Lar
Language:unknown
Published: 2017
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000003230
https://meral.edu.mm/records/3230
id ftmeral:oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/3230
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmeral:oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/3230 2023-05-15T16:01:49+02:00 Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database Lwin, May Thet Tun, Khin Mar Lar 2017-12-27 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000003230 https://meral.edu.mm/records/3230 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000003230 https://meral.edu.mm/records/3230 2017 ftmeral https://doi.org/20.500.12678/0000003230 2021-12-19T19:33:26Z There are different types of DatabaseManagement System. Each has their own modeland architecture for data storage. In this paper,we compare Data Retrieval efficiency betweenRelational Database Management System(RDBMS) and Object-Relational DatabaseManagement System (ORDBMS), and the DataModel, Data Definition Language (DDL),DataManipulation Language (DML), Key Constraint,Index Structure are also compared. ORDBMSsupports many types and structures of objectmodels. The two structures of object models;object types and reference types (REF) forORDBMS arealso compared. The case study fordatabase uses company directory database. Theexperimental results show that the ORDBMSoutperform in data retrieval for complex querystatements because of direct linkage between datarecords in storage instead of logical linking (tablejoin).Oracle 11 g database software is used tobuild both RDBMS and ORDBMS Other/Unknown Material DML Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftmeral
language unknown
description There are different types of DatabaseManagement System. Each has their own modeland architecture for data storage. In this paper,we compare Data Retrieval efficiency betweenRelational Database Management System(RDBMS) and Object-Relational DatabaseManagement System (ORDBMS), and the DataModel, Data Definition Language (DDL),DataManipulation Language (DML), Key Constraint,Index Structure are also compared. ORDBMSsupports many types and structures of objectmodels. The two structures of object models;object types and reference types (REF) forORDBMS arealso compared. The case study fordatabase uses company directory database. Theexperimental results show that the ORDBMSoutperform in data retrieval for complex querystatements because of direct linkage between datarecords in storage instead of logical linking (tablejoin).Oracle 11 g database software is used tobuild both RDBMS and ORDBMS
author Lwin, May Thet
Tun, Khin Mar Lar
spellingShingle Lwin, May Thet
Tun, Khin Mar Lar
Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database
author_facet Lwin, May Thet
Tun, Khin Mar Lar
author_sort Lwin, May Thet
title Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database
title_short Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database
title_full Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database
title_fullStr Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database
title_sort comparing data retrieval in rdbms and ordbms using company directory database
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000003230
https://meral.edu.mm/records/3230
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000003230
https://meral.edu.mm/records/3230
op_doi https://doi.org/20.500.12678/0000003230
_version_ 1766397527881416704