Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database
There are different types of DatabaseManagement System. Each has their own modeland architecture for data storage. In this paper,we compare Data Retrieval efficiency betweenRelational Database Management System(RDBMS) and Object-Relational DatabaseManagement System (ORDBMS), and the DataModel, Data...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000003230 https://meral.edu.mm/records/3230 |
id |
ftmeral:oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/3230 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftmeral:oai:meral.edu.mm:recid/3230 2023-05-15T16:01:49+02:00 Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database Lwin, May Thet Tun, Khin Mar Lar 2017-12-27 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000003230 https://meral.edu.mm/records/3230 unknown http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000003230 https://meral.edu.mm/records/3230 2017 ftmeral https://doi.org/20.500.12678/0000003230 2021-12-19T19:33:26Z There are different types of DatabaseManagement System. Each has their own modeland architecture for data storage. In this paper,we compare Data Retrieval efficiency betweenRelational Database Management System(RDBMS) and Object-Relational DatabaseManagement System (ORDBMS), and the DataModel, Data Definition Language (DDL),DataManipulation Language (DML), Key Constraint,Index Structure are also compared. ORDBMSsupports many types and structures of objectmodels. The two structures of object models;object types and reference types (REF) forORDBMS arealso compared. The case study fordatabase uses company directory database. Theexperimental results show that the ORDBMSoutperform in data retrieval for complex querystatements because of direct linkage between datarecords in storage instead of logical linking (tablejoin).Oracle 11 g database software is used tobuild both RDBMS and ORDBMS Other/Unknown Material DML Unknown |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
ftmeral |
language |
unknown |
description |
There are different types of DatabaseManagement System. Each has their own modeland architecture for data storage. In this paper,we compare Data Retrieval efficiency betweenRelational Database Management System(RDBMS) and Object-Relational DatabaseManagement System (ORDBMS), and the DataModel, Data Definition Language (DDL),DataManipulation Language (DML), Key Constraint,Index Structure are also compared. ORDBMSsupports many types and structures of objectmodels. The two structures of object models;object types and reference types (REF) forORDBMS arealso compared. The case study fordatabase uses company directory database. Theexperimental results show that the ORDBMSoutperform in data retrieval for complex querystatements because of direct linkage between datarecords in storage instead of logical linking (tablejoin).Oracle 11 g database software is used tobuild both RDBMS and ORDBMS |
author |
Lwin, May Thet Tun, Khin Mar Lar |
spellingShingle |
Lwin, May Thet Tun, Khin Mar Lar Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database |
author_facet |
Lwin, May Thet Tun, Khin Mar Lar |
author_sort |
Lwin, May Thet |
title |
Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database |
title_short |
Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database |
title_full |
Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database |
title_fullStr |
Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing Data Retrieval in RDBMS and ORDBMS Using Company Directory Database |
title_sort |
comparing data retrieval in rdbms and ordbms using company directory database |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000003230 https://meral.edu.mm/records/3230 |
genre |
DML |
genre_facet |
DML |
op_relation |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12678/0000003230 https://meral.edu.mm/records/3230 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/20.500.12678/0000003230 |
_version_ |
1766397527881416704 |