Anatomy of junior high science textbooks : a content analysis of textual characteristics

Thesis (M.Ed.)--Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2001. Education Bibliography: leaves 109-118 The purpose of this descriptive study was to determine the textual characteristics of junior high science textbooks, focusing on text type, truth status, metalanguage use, scientific status and role in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Penney, Kimberley, 1970-
Other Authors: Memorial University of Newfoundland. Faculty of Education.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://collections.mun.ca/cdm/ref/collection/theses4/id/100395
id ftmemorialunivdc:oai:collections.mun.ca:theses4/100395
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmemorialunivdc:oai:collections.mun.ca:theses4/100395 2023-05-15T17:23:33+02:00 Anatomy of junior high science textbooks : a content analysis of textual characteristics Penney, Kimberley, 1970- Memorial University of Newfoundland. Faculty of Education. 2000 vii, 118 leaves Image/jpeg; Application/pdf http://collections.mun.ca/cdm/ref/collection/theses4/id/100395 Eng eng Electronic Theses and Dissertations (14.99 MB) -- http://collections.mun.ca/PDFs/theses/Penney_Kimberley.pdf a1522243 http://collections.mun.ca/cdm/ref/collection/theses4/id/100395 The author retains copyright ownership and moral rights in this thesis. Neither the thesis nor substantial extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author's permission. Paper copy kept in the Centre for Newfoundland Studies, Memorial University Libraries Science--Study and teaching (Middle school)--Textbooks Text 2000 ftmemorialunivdc 2015-08-06T19:22:11Z Thesis (M.Ed.)--Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2001. Education Bibliography: leaves 109-118 The purpose of this descriptive study was to determine the textual characteristics of junior high science textbooks, focusing on text type, truth status, metalanguage use, scientific status and role in scientific reasoning. Two textbook series were selected for analysis. Samples, representing ten percent of a life science and a physical science unit, were randomly selected from each textbook and analyzed. Popular reports of science were similarly analyzed to provide a comparative base. -- The general findings are: (1) the text type is overwhelmingly expository with no evidence of argumentation; (2) both forms of scientific writing are largely written as "true," but textbooks present scientific knowledge as less textured and more "true"; (3) textbooks have only one-third the metalanguage use of popular reports of science; and (4) the majority of statements are facts or conclusions. The differences found between the two forms of scientific writing are discussed in light of the goal of scientific literacy. Text Newfoundland studies University of Newfoundland Memorial University of Newfoundland: Digital Archives Initiative (DAI)
institution Open Polar
collection Memorial University of Newfoundland: Digital Archives Initiative (DAI)
op_collection_id ftmemorialunivdc
language English
topic Science--Study and teaching (Middle school)--Textbooks
spellingShingle Science--Study and teaching (Middle school)--Textbooks
Penney, Kimberley, 1970-
Anatomy of junior high science textbooks : a content analysis of textual characteristics
topic_facet Science--Study and teaching (Middle school)--Textbooks
description Thesis (M.Ed.)--Memorial University of Newfoundland, 2001. Education Bibliography: leaves 109-118 The purpose of this descriptive study was to determine the textual characteristics of junior high science textbooks, focusing on text type, truth status, metalanguage use, scientific status and role in scientific reasoning. Two textbook series were selected for analysis. Samples, representing ten percent of a life science and a physical science unit, were randomly selected from each textbook and analyzed. Popular reports of science were similarly analyzed to provide a comparative base. -- The general findings are: (1) the text type is overwhelmingly expository with no evidence of argumentation; (2) both forms of scientific writing are largely written as "true," but textbooks present scientific knowledge as less textured and more "true"; (3) textbooks have only one-third the metalanguage use of popular reports of science; and (4) the majority of statements are facts or conclusions. The differences found between the two forms of scientific writing are discussed in light of the goal of scientific literacy.
author2 Memorial University of Newfoundland. Faculty of Education.
format Text
author Penney, Kimberley, 1970-
author_facet Penney, Kimberley, 1970-
author_sort Penney, Kimberley, 1970-
title Anatomy of junior high science textbooks : a content analysis of textual characteristics
title_short Anatomy of junior high science textbooks : a content analysis of textual characteristics
title_full Anatomy of junior high science textbooks : a content analysis of textual characteristics
title_fullStr Anatomy of junior high science textbooks : a content analysis of textual characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Anatomy of junior high science textbooks : a content analysis of textual characteristics
title_sort anatomy of junior high science textbooks : a content analysis of textual characteristics
publishDate 2000
url http://collections.mun.ca/cdm/ref/collection/theses4/id/100395
genre Newfoundland studies
University of Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland studies
University of Newfoundland
op_source Paper copy kept in the Centre for Newfoundland Studies, Memorial University Libraries
op_relation Electronic Theses and Dissertations
(14.99 MB) -- http://collections.mun.ca/PDFs/theses/Penney_Kimberley.pdf
a1522243
http://collections.mun.ca/cdm/ref/collection/theses4/id/100395
op_rights The author retains copyright ownership and moral rights in this thesis. Neither the thesis nor substantial extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author's permission.
_version_ 1766113292765364224