Long term care in a Newfoundland region

• Main Author: Gruchy, Jennette
• Format: Thesis
• Language: English
• Published: Memorial University of Newfoundland 2010
• Subjects: Canada; Newfoundland
• Online Access: https://research.library.mun.ca/8861/; https://research.library.mun.ca/8861/1/Gruchy_Jennette.pdf

The St. John's region in Newfoundland, Canada had a population of 8435 ≥ 75 years in 1996, with 996 nursing home (NH) beds and 550 supervised care (SC) beds. However, only 116 SC beds were available at this time in the city of St. John's, where the majority of this at risk population lived. A single entry system to these institutions was implemented in 1995. To determine the need for long term care (LTC) two incident cohorts requesting placement were studied in 1995/96 (n=467) and in 1999/00 (n=464). Degree of disability was determined using the Residents Utilization Groups-III Classification (RUGs) and the Alberta Resource Classification System (ARCS). Time to placement and survival were measured. Factors predicting placement into LTC and mortality were determined. To determine the impact of the single entry system, clients of six NHs were assessed in 1997 (n=1044) and in 2003 (n=963). -- The number requiring placement increased from 392 to 431 from 1995/96 to 1999/00, an increase of 10% over four years. The population increase in those ≥ 75 years during this time was 8%. Comparing the two time periods, demographic characteristics were similar in the two incident cohorts. The proportion with no indicators for NH was the same (36%), and the proportion sent to SC was 25 and 28% in 1995/96 and 1999/00, respectively. There was no difference in RUGs classification between the two incident cohorts and the proportion classified as high level of care i.e., 6/7 on ARCS remained the same (22 vs. 23%). NH clients in 2003 differed from those in 1997; in 2003 the mean length of stay was shorter (3.7 vs. 4.5 years); the proportion with no indicators for NH care was smaller (10 vs. 19%); the proportion requiring special care/clinically complex was higher (45 vs. 30%); and the proportion with a low level ARCS i.e., 1/2 was smaller (16 vs. 25%). This suggests that clients admitted to NH care following the start of a single entry system were more appropriately placed than before. Time to placement was unchanged for SC and NH ...