Efficient Storage of Methane in Hydrate Form Using Soybean Powder

Natural gas is a promising future source for the increasing energy demand. It is partially clean energy with fewer environmental impacts, and it is necessary to develop technologies to cater to the supply chain. Due to their inherent structural properties, gas hydrates or clathrate hydrates are prom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Methane
Main Authors: Rama Rao Ganteda, Sai Kiran Burla, Jagan Mohan Reddy Boggu, Pinnelli S. R. Prasad
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/methane1030016
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2674-0389/1/3/16/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2674-0389/1/3/16/ 2023-08-20T04:07:57+02:00 Efficient Storage of Methane in Hydrate Form Using Soybean Powder Rama Rao Ganteda Sai Kiran Burla Jagan Mohan Reddy Boggu Pinnelli S. R. Prasad 2022-08-18 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/methane1030016 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/methane1030016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Methane; Volume 1; Issue 3; Pages: 201-209 methane hydrates bio-powders gas uptake kinetics methane storage non-foam additives Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/methane1030016 2023-08-01T06:07:16Z Natural gas is a promising future source for the increasing energy demand. It is partially clean energy with fewer environmental impacts, and it is necessary to develop technologies to cater to the supply chain. Due to their inherent structural properties, gas hydrates or clathrate hydrates are promising materials for capturing and storing methane gas. In the present study, the experimental investigations were performed to assess the utilization of soybean powder (SBP) as a promoting additive compared to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for methane hydrate formation. The methane hydrate formation temperature and pressure with SBP are 277.8 ± 3.2 K, 7050.9 ± 76.2 kPa, similar to SDS 277.2 ± 0.3 K, 7446.3 ± 5.7 kPa in the non-stirred system. The gas uptake capacity is about 94.2 ± 4.5 v/v and 92.4 ± 4.6 v/v with SBP and SDS, which is ~60% of the practical, achievable limit. The time for the 90% of hydrate conversion is ~4.6 times higher for SBP than SDS. The more prolonged kinetics is ascribed to the complex constituents in the SBP. In contrast to the SDS solution, no foam was produced in the sample of the SBP solution. The current studies demonstrate that SBP can be utilized to develop cleaner and more effective promoters for methane hydrate formation without foam creation. Text Methane hydrate MDPI Open Access Publishing Methane 1 3 201 209
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic methane hydrates
bio-powders
gas uptake kinetics
methane storage
non-foam additives
spellingShingle methane hydrates
bio-powders
gas uptake kinetics
methane storage
non-foam additives
Rama Rao Ganteda
Sai Kiran Burla
Jagan Mohan Reddy Boggu
Pinnelli S. R. Prasad
Efficient Storage of Methane in Hydrate Form Using Soybean Powder
topic_facet methane hydrates
bio-powders
gas uptake kinetics
methane storage
non-foam additives
description Natural gas is a promising future source for the increasing energy demand. It is partially clean energy with fewer environmental impacts, and it is necessary to develop technologies to cater to the supply chain. Due to their inherent structural properties, gas hydrates or clathrate hydrates are promising materials for capturing and storing methane gas. In the present study, the experimental investigations were performed to assess the utilization of soybean powder (SBP) as a promoting additive compared to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for methane hydrate formation. The methane hydrate formation temperature and pressure with SBP are 277.8 ± 3.2 K, 7050.9 ± 76.2 kPa, similar to SDS 277.2 ± 0.3 K, 7446.3 ± 5.7 kPa in the non-stirred system. The gas uptake capacity is about 94.2 ± 4.5 v/v and 92.4 ± 4.6 v/v with SBP and SDS, which is ~60% of the practical, achievable limit. The time for the 90% of hydrate conversion is ~4.6 times higher for SBP than SDS. The more prolonged kinetics is ascribed to the complex constituents in the SBP. In contrast to the SDS solution, no foam was produced in the sample of the SBP solution. The current studies demonstrate that SBP can be utilized to develop cleaner and more effective promoters for methane hydrate formation without foam creation.
format Text
author Rama Rao Ganteda
Sai Kiran Burla
Jagan Mohan Reddy Boggu
Pinnelli S. R. Prasad
author_facet Rama Rao Ganteda
Sai Kiran Burla
Jagan Mohan Reddy Boggu
Pinnelli S. R. Prasad
author_sort Rama Rao Ganteda
title Efficient Storage of Methane in Hydrate Form Using Soybean Powder
title_short Efficient Storage of Methane in Hydrate Form Using Soybean Powder
title_full Efficient Storage of Methane in Hydrate Form Using Soybean Powder
title_fullStr Efficient Storage of Methane in Hydrate Form Using Soybean Powder
title_full_unstemmed Efficient Storage of Methane in Hydrate Form Using Soybean Powder
title_sort efficient storage of methane in hydrate form using soybean powder
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/methane1030016
genre Methane hydrate
genre_facet Methane hydrate
op_source Methane; Volume 1; Issue 3; Pages: 201-209
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/methane1030016
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/methane1030016
container_title Methane
container_volume 1
container_issue 3
container_start_page 201
op_container_end_page 209
_version_ 1774719936353009664