Toward a Permafrost Vulnerability Index for Critical Infrastructure, Community Resilience and National Security

There has been a growth in the number of composite indicator tools used to assess community risk, vulnerability, and resilience, to assist study and policy planning. However, existing research shows that these composite indicators vary extensively in method, selected variables, aggregation methods,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geographies
Main Authors: Lilian Alessa, James Valentine, Sean Moon, Chris McComb, Sierra Hicks, Vladimir Romanovsky, Ming Xiao, Andrew Kliskey
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies3030027
_version_ 1821828463282094080
author Lilian Alessa
James Valentine
Sean Moon
Chris McComb
Sierra Hicks
Vladimir Romanovsky
Ming Xiao
Andrew Kliskey
author_facet Lilian Alessa
James Valentine
Sean Moon
Chris McComb
Sierra Hicks
Vladimir Romanovsky
Ming Xiao
Andrew Kliskey
author_sort Lilian Alessa
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 3
container_start_page 522
container_title Geographies
container_volume 3
description There has been a growth in the number of composite indicator tools used to assess community risk, vulnerability, and resilience, to assist study and policy planning. However, existing research shows that these composite indicators vary extensively in method, selected variables, aggregation methods, and sample size. The result is a plethora of qualitative and quantitative composite indices to choose from. Despite each providing valuable location-based information about specific communities and their qualities, the results of studies, each using disparate methods, cannot easily be integrated for use in decision making, given the different index attributes and study locations. Like many regions in the world, the Arctic is experiencing increased variability in temperatures as a direct consequence of a changing planetary climate. Cascading effects of changes in permafrost are poorly characterized, thus limiting response at multiple scales. We offer that by considering the spatial interaction between the effects of permafrost, infrastructure, and diverse patterns of community characteristics, existing research using different composite indices and frameworks can be augmented. We used a system-science and place-based knowledge approach that accounts for sub-system and cascade impacts through a proximity model of spatial interaction. An estimated ‘permafrost vulnerability surface’ was calculated across Alaska using two existing indices: relevant infrastructure and permafrost extent. The value of this surface in 186 communities and 30 military facilities was extracted and ordered to match the numerical rankings of the Denali Commission in their assessment of permafrost threat, allowing accurate comparison between the permafrost threat ranks and the PVI rankings. The methods behind the PVI provide a tool that can incorporate multiple risk, resilience, and vulnerability indices to aid adaptation planning, especially where large-scale studies with good geographic sample distribution using the same criteria and methods do ...
format Text
genre Arctic
permafrost
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
permafrost
Alaska
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2673-7086/3/3/27/
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_container_end_page 542
op_coverage agris
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies3030027
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geographies3030027
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_source Geographies; Volume 3; Issue 3; Pages: 522-542
publishDate 2023
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2673-7086/3/3/27/ 2025-01-16T20:33:23+00:00 Toward a Permafrost Vulnerability Index for Critical Infrastructure, Community Resilience and National Security Lilian Alessa James Valentine Sean Moon Chris McComb Sierra Hicks Vladimir Romanovsky Ming Xiao Andrew Kliskey agris 2023-08-23 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies3030027 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geographies3030027 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Geographies; Volume 3; Issue 3; Pages: 522-542 arctic infrastructure national security permafrost resilience permafrost vulnerability index cascading effects Text 2023 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies3030027 2023-08-27T23:53:04Z There has been a growth in the number of composite indicator tools used to assess community risk, vulnerability, and resilience, to assist study and policy planning. However, existing research shows that these composite indicators vary extensively in method, selected variables, aggregation methods, and sample size. The result is a plethora of qualitative and quantitative composite indices to choose from. Despite each providing valuable location-based information about specific communities and their qualities, the results of studies, each using disparate methods, cannot easily be integrated for use in decision making, given the different index attributes and study locations. Like many regions in the world, the Arctic is experiencing increased variability in temperatures as a direct consequence of a changing planetary climate. Cascading effects of changes in permafrost are poorly characterized, thus limiting response at multiple scales. We offer that by considering the spatial interaction between the effects of permafrost, infrastructure, and diverse patterns of community characteristics, existing research using different composite indices and frameworks can be augmented. We used a system-science and place-based knowledge approach that accounts for sub-system and cascade impacts through a proximity model of spatial interaction. An estimated ‘permafrost vulnerability surface’ was calculated across Alaska using two existing indices: relevant infrastructure and permafrost extent. The value of this surface in 186 communities and 30 military facilities was extracted and ordered to match the numerical rankings of the Denali Commission in their assessment of permafrost threat, allowing accurate comparison between the permafrost threat ranks and the PVI rankings. The methods behind the PVI provide a tool that can incorporate multiple risk, resilience, and vulnerability indices to aid adaptation planning, especially where large-scale studies with good geographic sample distribution using the same criteria and methods do ... Text Arctic permafrost Alaska MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Geographies 3 3 522 542
spellingShingle arctic
infrastructure
national security
permafrost
resilience
permafrost vulnerability index
cascading effects
Lilian Alessa
James Valentine
Sean Moon
Chris McComb
Sierra Hicks
Vladimir Romanovsky
Ming Xiao
Andrew Kliskey
Toward a Permafrost Vulnerability Index for Critical Infrastructure, Community Resilience and National Security
title Toward a Permafrost Vulnerability Index for Critical Infrastructure, Community Resilience and National Security
title_full Toward a Permafrost Vulnerability Index for Critical Infrastructure, Community Resilience and National Security
title_fullStr Toward a Permafrost Vulnerability Index for Critical Infrastructure, Community Resilience and National Security
title_full_unstemmed Toward a Permafrost Vulnerability Index for Critical Infrastructure, Community Resilience and National Security
title_short Toward a Permafrost Vulnerability Index for Critical Infrastructure, Community Resilience and National Security
title_sort toward a permafrost vulnerability index for critical infrastructure, community resilience and national security
topic arctic
infrastructure
national security
permafrost
resilience
permafrost vulnerability index
cascading effects
topic_facet arctic
infrastructure
national security
permafrost
resilience
permafrost vulnerability index
cascading effects
url https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies3030027