The Energy Efficiency Post-COVID-19 in China’s Office Buildings

China promptly took the leading step to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, producing the first scientific guidelines assuming health above energy consumption and significantly changing HVAC/AHU operation. The research intended to fulfill the gap by measuring the impact of the guidelines on energy use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clean Technologies
Main Authors: Carlos C. Duarte, Nuno D. Cortiços
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4010012
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2571-8797/4/1/12/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2571-8797/4/1/12/ 2023-08-20T04:10:03+02:00 The Energy Efficiency Post-COVID-19 in China’s Office Buildings Carlos C. Duarte Nuno D. Cortiços agris 2022-03-02 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4010012 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4010012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Clean Technologies; Volume 4; Issue 1; Pages: 174-233 COVID-19 guidelines China office buildings energy consumption CO 2 emissions Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4010012 2023-08-01T04:20:40Z China promptly took the leading step to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, producing the first scientific guidelines assuming health above energy consumption and significantly changing HVAC/AHU operation. The research intended to fulfill the gap by measuring the impact of the guidelines on energy use intensity, CO2 emissions, and energy operation costs related to workplaces. The guidelines are long-term sector and industry trends following occupants’ health and safety concerns, and today they are applied to nursing homes. The research extended the study to post-COVID-19 scenarios by crossing those settings with published reports on telework predictions. The methodology resorts to Building Energy Simulation software to assess the Chinese standard large office building on 8 climate zones and 17 subzones between pre- and post-COVID-19 scenarios under those guidelines. The outcomes suggest an upward trend in energy use intensity (11.70–12.46%), CO2 emissions (11.13–11.76%), and costs (9.37–9.89%) for buildings located in “warm/mixed” to “subarctic” climates, especially in colder regions with high heating demands. On the other hand, the figures for “very hot” to “hot/warm” climates lower the energy use intensity (14.76–15.47%), CO2 emissions (9%), and costs (9.64–9.77%). Text Subarctic MDPI Open Access Publishing Clean Technologies 4 1 174 233
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic COVID-19
guidelines
China
office buildings
energy consumption
CO 2 emissions
spellingShingle COVID-19
guidelines
China
office buildings
energy consumption
CO 2 emissions
Carlos C. Duarte
Nuno D. Cortiços
The Energy Efficiency Post-COVID-19 in China’s Office Buildings
topic_facet COVID-19
guidelines
China
office buildings
energy consumption
CO 2 emissions
description China promptly took the leading step to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, producing the first scientific guidelines assuming health above energy consumption and significantly changing HVAC/AHU operation. The research intended to fulfill the gap by measuring the impact of the guidelines on energy use intensity, CO2 emissions, and energy operation costs related to workplaces. The guidelines are long-term sector and industry trends following occupants’ health and safety concerns, and today they are applied to nursing homes. The research extended the study to post-COVID-19 scenarios by crossing those settings with published reports on telework predictions. The methodology resorts to Building Energy Simulation software to assess the Chinese standard large office building on 8 climate zones and 17 subzones between pre- and post-COVID-19 scenarios under those guidelines. The outcomes suggest an upward trend in energy use intensity (11.70–12.46%), CO2 emissions (11.13–11.76%), and costs (9.37–9.89%) for buildings located in “warm/mixed” to “subarctic” climates, especially in colder regions with high heating demands. On the other hand, the figures for “very hot” to “hot/warm” climates lower the energy use intensity (14.76–15.47%), CO2 emissions (9%), and costs (9.64–9.77%).
format Text
author Carlos C. Duarte
Nuno D. Cortiços
author_facet Carlos C. Duarte
Nuno D. Cortiços
author_sort Carlos C. Duarte
title The Energy Efficiency Post-COVID-19 in China’s Office Buildings
title_short The Energy Efficiency Post-COVID-19 in China’s Office Buildings
title_full The Energy Efficiency Post-COVID-19 in China’s Office Buildings
title_fullStr The Energy Efficiency Post-COVID-19 in China’s Office Buildings
title_full_unstemmed The Energy Efficiency Post-COVID-19 in China’s Office Buildings
title_sort energy efficiency post-covid-19 in china’s office buildings
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4010012
op_coverage agris
genre Subarctic
genre_facet Subarctic
op_source Clean Technologies; Volume 4; Issue 1; Pages: 174-233
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4010012
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4010012
container_title Clean Technologies
container_volume 4
container_issue 1
container_start_page 174
op_container_end_page 233
_version_ 1774723949657063424