Nonstandard Use of the “Reflexive” Affix -sja in Russian Speech of Bilingual Speakers of Northern Siberia and the Russian Far East
One of the features of the oral Russian speech of bilingual speakers of the indigenous languages of Russia is the omission/the overuse of the “reflexive” affix -sja (a “middle voice” marker with a wide range of uses including reflexive, reciprocal, anticausative, passive, and some others). We discus...
Published in: | Languages |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020039 |
_version_ | 1821503991597498368 |
---|---|
author | Irina Khomchenkova Polina Pleshak Natalia Stoynova |
author_facet | Irina Khomchenkova Polina Pleshak Natalia Stoynova |
author_sort | Irina Khomchenkova |
collection | MDPI Open Access Publishing |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | Languages |
container_volume | 4 |
description | One of the features of the oral Russian speech of bilingual speakers of the indigenous languages of Russia is the omission/the overuse of the “reflexive” affix -sja (a “middle voice” marker with a wide range of uses including reflexive, reciprocal, anticausative, passive, and some others). We discuss the data on the nonstandard use of -sja in the Russian speech of bilingual speakers of two language groups that differ both from Russian and from each other in this grammatical domain: Samoyedic (Forest Enets, Nganasan, and Nenets) and Tungusic (Nanai and Ulch). The data come from the corpus of contact-influenced Russian speech, which is being created by our team. We show that the mismatches in standard and nonstandard usage cannot be explained by direct structural copying from the donor language (indigenous) to the recipient one (the local variety of Russian). Nor is there a consistent system which differs from standard Russian since there are many more usages that follow the rules of standard Russian. The influence of the indigenous languages explains some overuses and omissions; the others can be explained by other factors, e.g., difficulties in the acquisition of verb pairs with non-transparent semantic or syntactic relations. |
format | Text |
genre | Enets nenets Nganasan* samoyed* Tungusic languages Siberia |
genre_facet | Enets nenets Nganasan* samoyed* Tungusic languages Siberia |
id | ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2226-471X/4/2/39/ |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftmdpi |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020039 |
op_relation | https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/languages4020039 |
op_rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
op_source | Languages; Volume 4; Issue 2; Pages: 39 |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2226-471X/4/2/39/ 2025-01-16T21:44:01+00:00 Nonstandard Use of the “Reflexive” Affix -sja in Russian Speech of Bilingual Speakers of Northern Siberia and the Russian Far East Irina Khomchenkova Polina Pleshak Natalia Stoynova 2019-06-17 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020039 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/languages4020039 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Languages; Volume 4; Issue 2; Pages: 39 bilingualism language contact pattern borrowing Russian Samoyedic languages Tungusic languages reflexive valency changing middle voice Text 2019 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020039 2023-07-31T22:21:52Z One of the features of the oral Russian speech of bilingual speakers of the indigenous languages of Russia is the omission/the overuse of the “reflexive” affix -sja (a “middle voice” marker with a wide range of uses including reflexive, reciprocal, anticausative, passive, and some others). We discuss the data on the nonstandard use of -sja in the Russian speech of bilingual speakers of two language groups that differ both from Russian and from each other in this grammatical domain: Samoyedic (Forest Enets, Nganasan, and Nenets) and Tungusic (Nanai and Ulch). The data come from the corpus of contact-influenced Russian speech, which is being created by our team. We show that the mismatches in standard and nonstandard usage cannot be explained by direct structural copying from the donor language (indigenous) to the recipient one (the local variety of Russian). Nor is there a consistent system which differs from standard Russian since there are many more usages that follow the rules of standard Russian. The influence of the indigenous languages explains some overuses and omissions; the others can be explained by other factors, e.g., difficulties in the acquisition of verb pairs with non-transparent semantic or syntactic relations. Text Enets nenets Nganasan* samoyed* Tungusic languages Siberia MDPI Open Access Publishing Languages 4 2 39 |
spellingShingle | bilingualism language contact pattern borrowing Russian Samoyedic languages Tungusic languages reflexive valency changing middle voice Irina Khomchenkova Polina Pleshak Natalia Stoynova Nonstandard Use of the “Reflexive” Affix -sja in Russian Speech of Bilingual Speakers of Northern Siberia and the Russian Far East |
title | Nonstandard Use of the “Reflexive” Affix -sja in Russian Speech of Bilingual Speakers of Northern Siberia and the Russian Far East |
title_full | Nonstandard Use of the “Reflexive” Affix -sja in Russian Speech of Bilingual Speakers of Northern Siberia and the Russian Far East |
title_fullStr | Nonstandard Use of the “Reflexive” Affix -sja in Russian Speech of Bilingual Speakers of Northern Siberia and the Russian Far East |
title_full_unstemmed | Nonstandard Use of the “Reflexive” Affix -sja in Russian Speech of Bilingual Speakers of Northern Siberia and the Russian Far East |
title_short | Nonstandard Use of the “Reflexive” Affix -sja in Russian Speech of Bilingual Speakers of Northern Siberia and the Russian Far East |
title_sort | nonstandard use of the “reflexive” affix -sja in russian speech of bilingual speakers of northern siberia and the russian far east |
topic | bilingualism language contact pattern borrowing Russian Samoyedic languages Tungusic languages reflexive valency changing middle voice |
topic_facet | bilingualism language contact pattern borrowing Russian Samoyedic languages Tungusic languages reflexive valency changing middle voice |
url | https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020039 |