Charophytes (Charophyceae, Charales) of South Kazakhstan: Diversity, Distribution, and Tentative Red List

The presented research was conducted during 2019–2022 in south and southeast Kazakhstan to document the species richness, distribution, and ecology of charophytes (Characeae) as a first step towards to estimate the need for species protection. Across the 54 sites, we found ten species and one variet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plants
Main Authors: Satbay Nurashov, Gaukhar Jumakhanova, Sophia Barinova, Roman Romanov, Elmira Sametova, Aibek Jiyenbekov, Saule Shalgimbayeva, Thomas Edward Smith
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020368
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2223-7747/12/2/368/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2223-7747/12/2/368/ 2023-08-20T04:05:55+02:00 Charophytes (Charophyceae, Charales) of South Kazakhstan: Diversity, Distribution, and Tentative Red List Satbay Nurashov Gaukhar Jumakhanova Sophia Barinova Roman Romanov Elmira Sametova Aibek Jiyenbekov Saule Shalgimbayeva Thomas Edward Smith agris 2023-01-12 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020368 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Plant Ecology https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12020368 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Plants; Volume 12; Issue 2; Pages: 368 Characeae Kazakhstan morphology ecology DNA barcoding species protection Text 2023 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020368 2023-08-01T08:16:31Z The presented research was conducted during 2019–2022 in south and southeast Kazakhstan to document the species richness, distribution, and ecology of charophytes (Characeae) as a first step towards to estimate the need for species protection. Across the 54 sites, we found ten species and one variety. Chara vulgaris Linnaeus and C. contraria A.Braun ex Kützing were the most common species, followed by C. canescens Loiseleur, C. kirghisorum C. F. Lessing, C. tomentosa Linnaeus, C. dominii J. Vilhelm, C. globata W. Migula, Nitellopsis obtusa (Desvaux) J. Groves, and Nitella hyalina (De Candolle) C. Agardh. The list of localities for each species was compiled. The distribution of each taxon was mapped in relations to the ecoregions studied. The two most frequent species were found in a wide spectrum of ecoregions, whereas all other species occurred in only a few regions in Kazakhstan. The Kaskelen River Valley had the most sampled sites with the highest number of co-occurring species (up to five together). Statistical maps were plotted in attempt to outline key environmental variables explaining the distribution of each species. A comparison of species and environmental variables distribution maps lets us assume that C. vulgaris prefers low altitude habitats with higher water temperatures, organic enrichments, and color, but low oxygen and pH. Other species prefer clear, alkaline, organically unpolluted, and well-oxygenated waters in lowland habitats. The redundancy detrended analysis (RDA) defined pH and altitude as negative factors for Nitellopsis obtusa whereas an increase in water temperature was positive. Altitude and water temperatures affected Chara contraria positively while altitude negatively influenced the rare species: Chara tomentosa, C. kirghisorum, and C. dominii. The matK sequences were obtained for C. contraria and C. vulgaris to confirm their identity according to morphological traits and to compare populations of C. gymnophylla and C. vulgaris from an arid region in Israel. Our data allowed for ... Text Chara contraria MDPI Open Access Publishing Plants 12 2 368
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic Characeae
Kazakhstan
morphology
ecology
DNA barcoding
species protection
spellingShingle Characeae
Kazakhstan
morphology
ecology
DNA barcoding
species protection
Satbay Nurashov
Gaukhar Jumakhanova
Sophia Barinova
Roman Romanov
Elmira Sametova
Aibek Jiyenbekov
Saule Shalgimbayeva
Thomas Edward Smith
Charophytes (Charophyceae, Charales) of South Kazakhstan: Diversity, Distribution, and Tentative Red List
topic_facet Characeae
Kazakhstan
morphology
ecology
DNA barcoding
species protection
description The presented research was conducted during 2019–2022 in south and southeast Kazakhstan to document the species richness, distribution, and ecology of charophytes (Characeae) as a first step towards to estimate the need for species protection. Across the 54 sites, we found ten species and one variety. Chara vulgaris Linnaeus and C. contraria A.Braun ex Kützing were the most common species, followed by C. canescens Loiseleur, C. kirghisorum C. F. Lessing, C. tomentosa Linnaeus, C. dominii J. Vilhelm, C. globata W. Migula, Nitellopsis obtusa (Desvaux) J. Groves, and Nitella hyalina (De Candolle) C. Agardh. The list of localities for each species was compiled. The distribution of each taxon was mapped in relations to the ecoregions studied. The two most frequent species were found in a wide spectrum of ecoregions, whereas all other species occurred in only a few regions in Kazakhstan. The Kaskelen River Valley had the most sampled sites with the highest number of co-occurring species (up to five together). Statistical maps were plotted in attempt to outline key environmental variables explaining the distribution of each species. A comparison of species and environmental variables distribution maps lets us assume that C. vulgaris prefers low altitude habitats with higher water temperatures, organic enrichments, and color, but low oxygen and pH. Other species prefer clear, alkaline, organically unpolluted, and well-oxygenated waters in lowland habitats. The redundancy detrended analysis (RDA) defined pH and altitude as negative factors for Nitellopsis obtusa whereas an increase in water temperature was positive. Altitude and water temperatures affected Chara contraria positively while altitude negatively influenced the rare species: Chara tomentosa, C. kirghisorum, and C. dominii. The matK sequences were obtained for C. contraria and C. vulgaris to confirm their identity according to morphological traits and to compare populations of C. gymnophylla and C. vulgaris from an arid region in Israel. Our data allowed for ...
format Text
author Satbay Nurashov
Gaukhar Jumakhanova
Sophia Barinova
Roman Romanov
Elmira Sametova
Aibek Jiyenbekov
Saule Shalgimbayeva
Thomas Edward Smith
author_facet Satbay Nurashov
Gaukhar Jumakhanova
Sophia Barinova
Roman Romanov
Elmira Sametova
Aibek Jiyenbekov
Saule Shalgimbayeva
Thomas Edward Smith
author_sort Satbay Nurashov
title Charophytes (Charophyceae, Charales) of South Kazakhstan: Diversity, Distribution, and Tentative Red List
title_short Charophytes (Charophyceae, Charales) of South Kazakhstan: Diversity, Distribution, and Tentative Red List
title_full Charophytes (Charophyceae, Charales) of South Kazakhstan: Diversity, Distribution, and Tentative Red List
title_fullStr Charophytes (Charophyceae, Charales) of South Kazakhstan: Diversity, Distribution, and Tentative Red List
title_full_unstemmed Charophytes (Charophyceae, Charales) of South Kazakhstan: Diversity, Distribution, and Tentative Red List
title_sort charophytes (charophyceae, charales) of south kazakhstan: diversity, distribution, and tentative red list
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020368
op_coverage agris
genre Chara contraria
genre_facet Chara contraria
op_source Plants; Volume 12; Issue 2; Pages: 368
op_relation Plant Ecology
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12020368
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020368
container_title Plants
container_volume 12
container_issue 2
container_start_page 368
_version_ 1774716736297238528