Industrial Projects and Benefit-Sharing Arrangements in the Russian North. Is Contracting Possible?

The extractive industries and local communities in the Russian Arctic make socio-economic agreements to support social and environmental initiatives in the territories of their operations. The extractive industries address social responsibilities through grant projects and social investments. In the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resources
Main Author: Ekaterina Britcyna
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020104
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2079-9276/8/2/104/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2079-9276/8/2/104/ 2023-08-20T04:04:12+02:00 Industrial Projects and Benefit-Sharing Arrangements in the Russian North. Is Contracting Possible? Ekaterina Britcyna agris 2019-05-31 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020104 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/resources8020104 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Resources; Volume 8; Issue 2; Pages: 104 Benefit-sharing arrangements extractive projects natural resources corporate citizenship stakeholder management Text 2019 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020104 2023-07-31T22:19:25Z The extractive industries and local communities in the Russian Arctic make socio-economic agreements to support social and environmental initiatives in the territories of their operations. The extractive industries address social responsibilities through grant projects and social investments. In the framework of social investments, major industrial corporations are supposed to distribute benefits obtained from resource exploitation to stakeholders who are affected by industrial operations. This article presents different forms of benefit-sharing arrangements and how they work in practice in the context of contracting for natural resources (oil, gas, metals and minerals) in Russia. The analysis outlines specific types of contracts and how they are implemented. While benefit-sharing arrangements can provide some benefits for local and regional stakeholders, it is controversial whether these arrangements can improve the situation as far as even-handed sharing of society’s environmental risks, benefits, and impacts is concerned. The article discusses how voluntary social partnership agreements in line with corporate citizenship and stakeholder management can alleviate problems between local people and industries in the Russian Arctic. Text Arctic Russian North MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Resources 8 2 104
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic Benefit-sharing arrangements
extractive projects
natural resources
corporate citizenship
stakeholder management
spellingShingle Benefit-sharing arrangements
extractive projects
natural resources
corporate citizenship
stakeholder management
Ekaterina Britcyna
Industrial Projects and Benefit-Sharing Arrangements in the Russian North. Is Contracting Possible?
topic_facet Benefit-sharing arrangements
extractive projects
natural resources
corporate citizenship
stakeholder management
description The extractive industries and local communities in the Russian Arctic make socio-economic agreements to support social and environmental initiatives in the territories of their operations. The extractive industries address social responsibilities through grant projects and social investments. In the framework of social investments, major industrial corporations are supposed to distribute benefits obtained from resource exploitation to stakeholders who are affected by industrial operations. This article presents different forms of benefit-sharing arrangements and how they work in practice in the context of contracting for natural resources (oil, gas, metals and minerals) in Russia. The analysis outlines specific types of contracts and how they are implemented. While benefit-sharing arrangements can provide some benefits for local and regional stakeholders, it is controversial whether these arrangements can improve the situation as far as even-handed sharing of society’s environmental risks, benefits, and impacts is concerned. The article discusses how voluntary social partnership agreements in line with corporate citizenship and stakeholder management can alleviate problems between local people and industries in the Russian Arctic.
format Text
author Ekaterina Britcyna
author_facet Ekaterina Britcyna
author_sort Ekaterina Britcyna
title Industrial Projects and Benefit-Sharing Arrangements in the Russian North. Is Contracting Possible?
title_short Industrial Projects and Benefit-Sharing Arrangements in the Russian North. Is Contracting Possible?
title_full Industrial Projects and Benefit-Sharing Arrangements in the Russian North. Is Contracting Possible?
title_fullStr Industrial Projects and Benefit-Sharing Arrangements in the Russian North. Is Contracting Possible?
title_full_unstemmed Industrial Projects and Benefit-Sharing Arrangements in the Russian North. Is Contracting Possible?
title_sort industrial projects and benefit-sharing arrangements in the russian north. is contracting possible?
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020104
op_coverage agris
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Russian North
genre_facet Arctic
Russian North
op_source Resources; Volume 8; Issue 2; Pages: 104
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/resources8020104
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020104
container_title Resources
container_volume 8
container_issue 2
container_start_page 104
_version_ 1774714618394968064