Experimental Study on the Ice Resistance of a Naval Surface Ship with a Non-Icebreaking Bow

With the shrinking of Arctic sea ice due to global climate change, potential access to Arctic waters has increased for non-typical icebreaking or strengthened ships. Numerous studies have been conducted on hull form designs and ice resistance predictions for ships with typical icebreaking bows, but...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Main Authors: Jianqiao Sun, Yan Huang
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081518
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2077-1312/11/8/1518/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2077-1312/11/8/1518/ 2023-08-20T04:04:23+02:00 Experimental Study on the Ice Resistance of a Naval Surface Ship with a Non-Icebreaking Bow Jianqiao Sun Yan Huang agris 2023-07-30 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081518 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Ocean Engineering https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081518 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Journal of Marine Science and Engineering; Volume 11; Issue 8; Pages: 1518 ice resistance non-icebreaking bow model test ice load Text 2023 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081518 2023-08-01T11:04:47Z With the shrinking of Arctic sea ice due to global climate change, potential access to Arctic waters has increased for non-typical icebreaking or strengthened ships. Numerous studies have been conducted on hull form designs and ice resistance predictions for ships with typical icebreaking bows, but published research for ships with non-icebreaking bows in ice is still rare. The objective of this study was to investigate the ice resistance of a naval surface ship with a non-icebreaking bow through model tests in an ice tank. The naval surface combatant concept DTMB 5415 was used as the ship model. The tests were conducted under different levels of ice thicknesses and speeds. During the tests, the total resistance of the model ship was measured, accompanied by monitoring of the ice load at the stem area with a flexible tactile sensor sheet. Compared with the test results of icebreaker models in former studies, the total ice resistance, as well as the stem ice load, of the present ship was significantly higher. The ice crushing resistance component in the stem area accounted for more than 60% of the total resistance in the ice. Discussions on the applicability of a semi-empirical formula for predicting the ice resistance of the present ship are also presented. Keinonen’s formula was found to be relatively more consistent with the predictions produced by model tests, and a preliminary modification was proposed to obtain more accurate predictions. Text Arctic Climate change Icebreaker Sea ice MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11 8 1518
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic ice resistance
non-icebreaking bow
model test
ice load
spellingShingle ice resistance
non-icebreaking bow
model test
ice load
Jianqiao Sun
Yan Huang
Experimental Study on the Ice Resistance of a Naval Surface Ship with a Non-Icebreaking Bow
topic_facet ice resistance
non-icebreaking bow
model test
ice load
description With the shrinking of Arctic sea ice due to global climate change, potential access to Arctic waters has increased for non-typical icebreaking or strengthened ships. Numerous studies have been conducted on hull form designs and ice resistance predictions for ships with typical icebreaking bows, but published research for ships with non-icebreaking bows in ice is still rare. The objective of this study was to investigate the ice resistance of a naval surface ship with a non-icebreaking bow through model tests in an ice tank. The naval surface combatant concept DTMB 5415 was used as the ship model. The tests were conducted under different levels of ice thicknesses and speeds. During the tests, the total resistance of the model ship was measured, accompanied by monitoring of the ice load at the stem area with a flexible tactile sensor sheet. Compared with the test results of icebreaker models in former studies, the total ice resistance, as well as the stem ice load, of the present ship was significantly higher. The ice crushing resistance component in the stem area accounted for more than 60% of the total resistance in the ice. Discussions on the applicability of a semi-empirical formula for predicting the ice resistance of the present ship are also presented. Keinonen’s formula was found to be relatively more consistent with the predictions produced by model tests, and a preliminary modification was proposed to obtain more accurate predictions.
format Text
author Jianqiao Sun
Yan Huang
author_facet Jianqiao Sun
Yan Huang
author_sort Jianqiao Sun
title Experimental Study on the Ice Resistance of a Naval Surface Ship with a Non-Icebreaking Bow
title_short Experimental Study on the Ice Resistance of a Naval Surface Ship with a Non-Icebreaking Bow
title_full Experimental Study on the Ice Resistance of a Naval Surface Ship with a Non-Icebreaking Bow
title_fullStr Experimental Study on the Ice Resistance of a Naval Surface Ship with a Non-Icebreaking Bow
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Study on the Ice Resistance of a Naval Surface Ship with a Non-Icebreaking Bow
title_sort experimental study on the ice resistance of a naval surface ship with a non-icebreaking bow
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081518
op_coverage agris
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
Icebreaker
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
Icebreaker
Sea ice
op_source Journal of Marine Science and Engineering; Volume 11; Issue 8; Pages: 1518
op_relation Ocean Engineering
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081518
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081518
container_title Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
container_volume 11
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1518
_version_ 1774714766537785344