Effects of the Carbon Intensity Index Rating System on the Development of the Northeast Passage
For many years, the Suez Canal (also known as the Suez Route) has been the main route connecting Europe and Asia. However, compared with the Suez Route, the Northeast Passage could save up to 41% of the journey. The ship carbon intensity index (CII) rating system of the International Maritime Organi...
Published in: | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071341 |
id |
ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2077-1312/11/7/1341/ |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2077-1312/11/7/1341/ 2023-08-20T04:08:42+02:00 Effects of the Carbon Intensity Index Rating System on the Development of the Northeast Passage Yuh-Ming Tsai Cherng-Yuan Lin agris 2023-06-30 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071341 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Ocean Engineering https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071341 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Journal of Marine Science and Engineering; Volume 11; Issue 7; Pages: 1341 Northeast Passage CII rating carbon intensity index greenhouse gas marine engine emission Text 2023 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071341 2023-08-01T10:42:19Z For many years, the Suez Canal (also known as the Suez Route) has been the main route connecting Europe and Asia. However, compared with the Suez Route, the Northeast Passage could save up to 41% of the journey. The ship carbon intensity index (CII) rating system of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) came into effect in 2023. This study took an existing bulk carrier on the Europe–Asia route as an example to calculate the attained CII values at different sailing speeds. It was found that, regardless of external factors, when the ship speed dropped from 14.4 knots (85% maximum continuous rating (MCR)) to 12.6 knots (55% MCR), the corresponding attained CII value decreased from 6.48 g/ton·nm to 5.19 g/ton·nm. Therefore, sailing speed was the key factor influencing the attained CII value, and it was independent of the shipping distance. In addition, when the ship’s sailing output power was between 85% MCR and 75% MCR, for every 5% decrease in MCR, its attained CII value would decrease by 0.13 g/ton·nm, and the fuel consumption amount would decrease by 1 ton/day. However, when the ship sailed at an output power of 75% MCR to 55% MCR, for every 5% decrease in MCR, the attained CII value would decrease even more, up to 0.26 g/ton·nm. In addition, the attained CII value would be reduced by up to 100% and fuel consumption amount would be reduced by up to 1.5 ton/day, resulting in a 50% fuel saving effect. Therefore, to obtain a better CII rating, the optimal ship speed should be set between 75% MCR and 55% MCR according to the wave and wind strengths. However, although slow-speed sailing is the most efficient factor, the number of sailing days would also be extended. Through the ratio created by dividing the distance of the Northeast Passage by the Suez Route, whether the Northeast Passage has the benefit of balancing shipping schedules could be judged. The outcome indicated that a ratio lower than 1 would result in a more balanced shipping schedule. Compared with 2019, the number of ships sailing through the ... Text Northeast Passage MDPI Open Access Publishing Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11 7 1341 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
MDPI Open Access Publishing |
op_collection_id |
ftmdpi |
language |
English |
topic |
Northeast Passage CII rating carbon intensity index greenhouse gas marine engine emission |
spellingShingle |
Northeast Passage CII rating carbon intensity index greenhouse gas marine engine emission Yuh-Ming Tsai Cherng-Yuan Lin Effects of the Carbon Intensity Index Rating System on the Development of the Northeast Passage |
topic_facet |
Northeast Passage CII rating carbon intensity index greenhouse gas marine engine emission |
description |
For many years, the Suez Canal (also known as the Suez Route) has been the main route connecting Europe and Asia. However, compared with the Suez Route, the Northeast Passage could save up to 41% of the journey. The ship carbon intensity index (CII) rating system of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) came into effect in 2023. This study took an existing bulk carrier on the Europe–Asia route as an example to calculate the attained CII values at different sailing speeds. It was found that, regardless of external factors, when the ship speed dropped from 14.4 knots (85% maximum continuous rating (MCR)) to 12.6 knots (55% MCR), the corresponding attained CII value decreased from 6.48 g/ton·nm to 5.19 g/ton·nm. Therefore, sailing speed was the key factor influencing the attained CII value, and it was independent of the shipping distance. In addition, when the ship’s sailing output power was between 85% MCR and 75% MCR, for every 5% decrease in MCR, its attained CII value would decrease by 0.13 g/ton·nm, and the fuel consumption amount would decrease by 1 ton/day. However, when the ship sailed at an output power of 75% MCR to 55% MCR, for every 5% decrease in MCR, the attained CII value would decrease even more, up to 0.26 g/ton·nm. In addition, the attained CII value would be reduced by up to 100% and fuel consumption amount would be reduced by up to 1.5 ton/day, resulting in a 50% fuel saving effect. Therefore, to obtain a better CII rating, the optimal ship speed should be set between 75% MCR and 55% MCR according to the wave and wind strengths. However, although slow-speed sailing is the most efficient factor, the number of sailing days would also be extended. Through the ratio created by dividing the distance of the Northeast Passage by the Suez Route, whether the Northeast Passage has the benefit of balancing shipping schedules could be judged. The outcome indicated that a ratio lower than 1 would result in a more balanced shipping schedule. Compared with 2019, the number of ships sailing through the ... |
format |
Text |
author |
Yuh-Ming Tsai Cherng-Yuan Lin |
author_facet |
Yuh-Ming Tsai Cherng-Yuan Lin |
author_sort |
Yuh-Ming Tsai |
title |
Effects of the Carbon Intensity Index Rating System on the Development of the Northeast Passage |
title_short |
Effects of the Carbon Intensity Index Rating System on the Development of the Northeast Passage |
title_full |
Effects of the Carbon Intensity Index Rating System on the Development of the Northeast Passage |
title_fullStr |
Effects of the Carbon Intensity Index Rating System on the Development of the Northeast Passage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of the Carbon Intensity Index Rating System on the Development of the Northeast Passage |
title_sort |
effects of the carbon intensity index rating system on the development of the northeast passage |
publisher |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071341 |
op_coverage |
agris |
genre |
Northeast Passage |
genre_facet |
Northeast Passage |
op_source |
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering; Volume 11; Issue 7; Pages: 1341 |
op_relation |
Ocean Engineering https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071341 |
op_rights |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071341 |
container_title |
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
container_volume |
11 |
container_issue |
7 |
container_start_page |
1341 |
_version_ |
1774721116145713152 |