Evaluation of the Existing Electrophysiological Severity Classifications in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

• Published in: Journal of Clinical Medicine
• Main Authors: Toru Sasaki, Takafumi Koyama, Tomoyuki Kuroiwa, Akimoto Nimura, Atsushi Okawa, Yoshiaki Wakabayashi, Koji Fujita
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
• Subjects: carpal tunnel syndrome; nerve conduction study; median nerve; electrophysiological severity classification; DML
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061685

Electrophysiological examination is important for the diagnosis and evaluation of nerve function in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Electrophysiological severity classifications of CTS using a nerve conduction study (NCS) have been reported, and there are many reports on the relationship between severity classifications and clinical symptoms. The existing electrophysiological severity classifications have several problems, such as cases that do not fit into a classification and unclear reasons for the boundary value. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV) and distal motor latency (DML) and to evaluate whether the existing severity classification method is appropriate. We created a scatter diagram between SCV and DML for our NCSs and found a negative correlation between SCV and DML (correlation coefficient, −0.786). When we applied our NCSs to the existing classifications (Padua and Bland classifications), there were many unclassifiable cases (15.2%; Padua classification), and the number of Grade 3 cases was significantly higher than that of Grade 2 or 4 cases (Bland classification). Our large dataset revealed a strong negative correlation between SCV and DML, indicating that the existing severity classifications do not always accurately reflect the severity of the disease.