Gravity-Driven Membrane Reactor for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment: Effect of Reactor Configuration and Cleaning Protocol

In this study, three gravity-driven membrane (GDM) reactors with flat sheet membrane modules and various biocarriers (synthetic fibers, lava stones, and sands) were operated for municipal wastewater treatment. The effects of water head, periodically cleaning protocol, and operation temperature on th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Membranes
Main Authors: Ihtisham Ul Haq Shami, Bing Wu
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11060388
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2077-0375/11/6/388/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2077-0375/11/6/388/ 2023-08-20T04:07:29+02:00 Gravity-Driven Membrane Reactor for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment: Effect of Reactor Configuration and Cleaning Protocol Ihtisham Ul Haq Shami Bing Wu 2021-05-25 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11060388 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Membrane Applications https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes11060388 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Membranes; Volume 11; Issue 6; Pages: 388 biocarriers gravity-driven membrane filtration membrane fouling periodical membrane cleaning permeate quality Text 2021 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11060388 2023-08-01T01:48:11Z In this study, three gravity-driven membrane (GDM) reactors with flat sheet membrane modules and various biocarriers (synthetic fibers, lava stones, and sands) were operated for municipal wastewater treatment. The effects of water head, periodically cleaning protocol, and operation temperature on the GDM reactor performance were illustrated in terms of membrane performance and water quality. The results indicated that: (1) the cake layer fouling was predominant (>~85%), regardless of reactor configuration and operation conditions; (2) under lower water head, variable water head benefited in achieving higher permeate fluxes due to effective relaxation of the compacted cake layers; (3) the short-term chemical cleaning (30–60 min per 3–4 days) improved membrane performance, especially when additional physical shear force was implemented; (4) the lower temperature had negligible effect on the GDM reactors packed with Icelandic lava stones and sands. Furthermore, the wastewater treatment costs of the three GDM reactors were estimated, ranging between 0.31 and 0.37 EUR/m3, which was greatly lower than that of conventional membrane bioreactors under lower population scenarios. This sheds light on the technical and economic feasibility of biocarrier-facilitated GDM systems for decentralized wastewater treatment in Iceland. Text Iceland MDPI Open Access Publishing Membranes 11 6 388
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic biocarriers
gravity-driven membrane filtration
membrane fouling
periodical membrane cleaning
permeate quality
spellingShingle biocarriers
gravity-driven membrane filtration
membrane fouling
periodical membrane cleaning
permeate quality
Ihtisham Ul Haq Shami
Bing Wu
Gravity-Driven Membrane Reactor for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment: Effect of Reactor Configuration and Cleaning Protocol
topic_facet biocarriers
gravity-driven membrane filtration
membrane fouling
periodical membrane cleaning
permeate quality
description In this study, three gravity-driven membrane (GDM) reactors with flat sheet membrane modules and various biocarriers (synthetic fibers, lava stones, and sands) were operated for municipal wastewater treatment. The effects of water head, periodically cleaning protocol, and operation temperature on the GDM reactor performance were illustrated in terms of membrane performance and water quality. The results indicated that: (1) the cake layer fouling was predominant (>~85%), regardless of reactor configuration and operation conditions; (2) under lower water head, variable water head benefited in achieving higher permeate fluxes due to effective relaxation of the compacted cake layers; (3) the short-term chemical cleaning (30–60 min per 3–4 days) improved membrane performance, especially when additional physical shear force was implemented; (4) the lower temperature had negligible effect on the GDM reactors packed with Icelandic lava stones and sands. Furthermore, the wastewater treatment costs of the three GDM reactors were estimated, ranging between 0.31 and 0.37 EUR/m3, which was greatly lower than that of conventional membrane bioreactors under lower population scenarios. This sheds light on the technical and economic feasibility of biocarrier-facilitated GDM systems for decentralized wastewater treatment in Iceland.
format Text
author Ihtisham Ul Haq Shami
Bing Wu
author_facet Ihtisham Ul Haq Shami
Bing Wu
author_sort Ihtisham Ul Haq Shami
title Gravity-Driven Membrane Reactor for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment: Effect of Reactor Configuration and Cleaning Protocol
title_short Gravity-Driven Membrane Reactor for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment: Effect of Reactor Configuration and Cleaning Protocol
title_full Gravity-Driven Membrane Reactor for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment: Effect of Reactor Configuration and Cleaning Protocol
title_fullStr Gravity-Driven Membrane Reactor for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment: Effect of Reactor Configuration and Cleaning Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Gravity-Driven Membrane Reactor for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment: Effect of Reactor Configuration and Cleaning Protocol
title_sort gravity-driven membrane reactor for decentralized wastewater treatment: effect of reactor configuration and cleaning protocol
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11060388
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Membranes; Volume 11; Issue 6; Pages: 388
op_relation Membrane Applications
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes11060388
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11060388
container_title Membranes
container_volume 11
container_issue 6
container_start_page 388
_version_ 1774719138722217984