Evaluation of Sustainable Development in European Union Countries

Despite the great importance of sustainable development for a country, it is possible to say, having reviewed the literature widely, that this research is the first to use a Multi-Criteria Decision Method (MCDM) to analyze the sustainability of EU countries, considering different dimensions and weig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Sciences
Main Authors: Carlos Javier Martín, María Carmen Carnero
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224880
_version_ 1821554907523579904
author Carlos Javier Martín
María Carmen Carnero
author_facet Carlos Javier Martín
María Carmen Carnero
author_sort Carlos Javier Martín
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 22
container_start_page 4880
container_title Applied Sciences
container_volume 9
description Despite the great importance of sustainable development for a country, it is possible to say, having reviewed the literature widely, that this research is the first to use a Multi-Criteria Decision Method (MCDM) to analyze the sustainability of EU countries, considering different dimensions and weighting the criteria with the help of a group of experts. This paper therefore sets out a Multi-Criteria Model for analyzing the development of sustainability in EU countries (and Norway and Iceland). This required prior filtering and analysis of the data from the Eurostat database. The model was built with the multi-criteria Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. Four experts in sustainability participated in the weighting process. The results of the AHP model are identified by areas of sustainability, with the highest value found in Norway, and the rest are found around it forming rings of sustainability, where sustainability decreases the further a country is from Norway. This research could be used to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each country with regard to sustainable development, and by analyzing the measures taken by Norway and other countries with very high sustainability, by continuous improvement processes, reach similar levels of sustainable development.
format Text
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3417/9/22/4880/
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_coverage agris
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224880
op_relation Environmental Sciences
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app9224880
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_source Applied Sciences; Volume 9; Issue 22; Pages: 4880
publishDate 2019
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3417/9/22/4880/ 2025-01-16T22:38:09+00:00 Evaluation of Sustainable Development in European Union Countries Carlos Javier Martín María Carmen Carnero agris 2019-11-14 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224880 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Environmental Sciences https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app9224880 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Applied Sciences; Volume 9; Issue 22; Pages: 4880 sustainable development European Union countries analytic hierarchy process (AHP) Text 2019 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224880 2023-07-31T22:47:39Z Despite the great importance of sustainable development for a country, it is possible to say, having reviewed the literature widely, that this research is the first to use a Multi-Criteria Decision Method (MCDM) to analyze the sustainability of EU countries, considering different dimensions and weighting the criteria with the help of a group of experts. This paper therefore sets out a Multi-Criteria Model for analyzing the development of sustainability in EU countries (and Norway and Iceland). This required prior filtering and analysis of the data from the Eurostat database. The model was built with the multi-criteria Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. Four experts in sustainability participated in the weighting process. The results of the AHP model are identified by areas of sustainability, with the highest value found in Norway, and the rest are found around it forming rings of sustainability, where sustainability decreases the further a country is from Norway. This research could be used to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each country with regard to sustainable development, and by analyzing the measures taken by Norway and other countries with very high sustainability, by continuous improvement processes, reach similar levels of sustainable development. Text Iceland MDPI Open Access Publishing Norway Applied Sciences 9 22 4880
spellingShingle sustainable development
European Union countries
analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
Carlos Javier Martín
María Carmen Carnero
Evaluation of Sustainable Development in European Union Countries
title Evaluation of Sustainable Development in European Union Countries
title_full Evaluation of Sustainable Development in European Union Countries
title_fullStr Evaluation of Sustainable Development in European Union Countries
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Sustainable Development in European Union Countries
title_short Evaluation of Sustainable Development in European Union Countries
title_sort evaluation of sustainable development in european union countries
topic sustainable development
European Union countries
analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
topic_facet sustainable development
European Union countries
analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
url https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224880