Comparing Fish Density and Echo Strength Distribution Recorded by Two Generations of Single Beam Echo Sounders

Hydroacoustic acquisition was performed by means of two different single beam systems, the Simradmodel EK15 from 2015 and the Simrad model EY-M from the 1980s to explore potential differences of fish density and target strength (TS) distribution between EK15 and EY-M-based estimates. The oligotrophi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Sciences
Main Authors: Arne N. Linløkken, Frode Næstad, Kjell Langdal, Kjartan Østbye
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102041
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3417/9/10/2041/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3417/9/10/2041/ 2023-08-20T04:03:16+02:00 Comparing Fish Density and Echo Strength Distribution Recorded by Two Generations of Single Beam Echo Sounders Arne N. Linløkken Frode Næstad Kjell Langdal Kjartan Østbye agris 2019-05-17 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102041 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Acoustics and Vibrations https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app9102041 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Applied Sciences; Volume 9; Issue 10; Pages: 2041 echo sounding single beam comparison smelt whitefish monitoring Text 2019 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102041 2023-07-31T22:17:11Z Hydroacoustic acquisition was performed by means of two different single beam systems, the Simradmodel EK15 from 2015 and the Simrad model EY-M from the 1980s to explore potential differences of fish density and target strength (TS) distribution between EK15 and EY-M-based estimates. The oligotrophic Lake Storsjøen (48 km2) with steep shores, was chosen for the survey. The pelagic fish stock is dominated by whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L.), and, recently, illegally stocked smelt (Osmerus eperlanus L.), and a low proportion of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.). The total density was estimated at two depth layers (18–32 and 32–48 m), and was quite similar for TS ≥ −56 dB: 755 and 498 fish ha−1, respectively for the EK15-based estimates and similarly 766 and 490 fish ha−1 for the EY-M estimate. Target strength distributions were similar for TS > −48 dB. The proportion of single fish detected with EK15 was negatively affected by the long pulse duration. Six acquisitions from 1986 to 2016 showed a dramatic increase of density of TS = −46 to −44 dB echoes (>10 cm) between 2013 and 2016. This was due to the growth of the introduced smelt population. Text Arctic charr Arctic Salvelinus alpinus MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Applied Sciences 9 10 2041
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic echo sounding
single beam
comparison
smelt
whitefish
monitoring
spellingShingle echo sounding
single beam
comparison
smelt
whitefish
monitoring
Arne N. Linløkken
Frode Næstad
Kjell Langdal
Kjartan Østbye
Comparing Fish Density and Echo Strength Distribution Recorded by Two Generations of Single Beam Echo Sounders
topic_facet echo sounding
single beam
comparison
smelt
whitefish
monitoring
description Hydroacoustic acquisition was performed by means of two different single beam systems, the Simradmodel EK15 from 2015 and the Simrad model EY-M from the 1980s to explore potential differences of fish density and target strength (TS) distribution between EK15 and EY-M-based estimates. The oligotrophic Lake Storsjøen (48 km2) with steep shores, was chosen for the survey. The pelagic fish stock is dominated by whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L.), and, recently, illegally stocked smelt (Osmerus eperlanus L.), and a low proportion of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.). The total density was estimated at two depth layers (18–32 and 32–48 m), and was quite similar for TS ≥ −56 dB: 755 and 498 fish ha−1, respectively for the EK15-based estimates and similarly 766 and 490 fish ha−1 for the EY-M estimate. Target strength distributions were similar for TS > −48 dB. The proportion of single fish detected with EK15 was negatively affected by the long pulse duration. Six acquisitions from 1986 to 2016 showed a dramatic increase of density of TS = −46 to −44 dB echoes (>10 cm) between 2013 and 2016. This was due to the growth of the introduced smelt population.
format Text
author Arne N. Linløkken
Frode Næstad
Kjell Langdal
Kjartan Østbye
author_facet Arne N. Linløkken
Frode Næstad
Kjell Langdal
Kjartan Østbye
author_sort Arne N. Linløkken
title Comparing Fish Density and Echo Strength Distribution Recorded by Two Generations of Single Beam Echo Sounders
title_short Comparing Fish Density and Echo Strength Distribution Recorded by Two Generations of Single Beam Echo Sounders
title_full Comparing Fish Density and Echo Strength Distribution Recorded by Two Generations of Single Beam Echo Sounders
title_fullStr Comparing Fish Density and Echo Strength Distribution Recorded by Two Generations of Single Beam Echo Sounders
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Fish Density and Echo Strength Distribution Recorded by Two Generations of Single Beam Echo Sounders
title_sort comparing fish density and echo strength distribution recorded by two generations of single beam echo sounders
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102041
op_coverage agris
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic charr
Arctic
Salvelinus alpinus
genre_facet Arctic charr
Arctic
Salvelinus alpinus
op_source Applied Sciences; Volume 9; Issue 10; Pages: 2041
op_relation Acoustics and Vibrations
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app9102041
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102041
container_title Applied Sciences
container_volume 9
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2041
_version_ 1774713661378527232