Verification of Convolutional Neural Network Cephalometric Landmark Identification

Introduction: The mass-harvesting of digitized medical data has prompted their use as a clinical and research tool. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and reliability of artificial intelligence derived cephalometric landmark identification with that of human observers. Methods: Te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Sciences
Main Authors: Moshe Davidovitch, Tatiana Sella-Tunis, Liat Abramovicz, Shoshana Reiter, Shlomo Matalon, Nir Shpack
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412784
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3417/12/24/12784/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3417/12/24/12784/ 2023-08-20T04:09:05+02:00 Verification of Convolutional Neural Network Cephalometric Landmark Identification Moshe Davidovitch Tatiana Sella-Tunis Liat Abramovicz Shoshana Reiter Shlomo Matalon Nir Shpack agris 2022-12-13 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412784 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app122412784 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Applied Sciences; Volume 12; Issue 24; Pages: 12784 artificial intelligence convolutional neural networks lateral cephalometric radiographs diagnostics Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412784 2023-08-01T07:46:44Z Introduction: The mass-harvesting of digitized medical data has prompted their use as a clinical and research tool. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and reliability of artificial intelligence derived cephalometric landmark identification with that of human observers. Methods: Ten pre-treatment digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were randomly selected from a university post-graduate clinic. The x- and y-coordinates of 21 (i.e., 42 points) hard and soft tissue landmarks were identified by 6 specialists, 19 residents, 4 imaging technicians, and a commercially available convolutional neural network artificial intelligence platform (CephX, Orca Dental, Hertzylia, Israel). Wilcoxon, Spearman and Bartlett tests were performed to compare agreement of human and AI landmark identification. Results: Six x- or y-coordinates (14.28%) were found to be statistically different, with only one being outside the 2 mm range of acceptable error, and with 97.6% of coordinates found to be within this range. Conclusions: The use of convolutional neural network artificial intelligence as a tool for cephalometric landmark identification was found to be highly accurate and can serve as an aid in orthodontic diagnosis. Text Orca MDPI Open Access Publishing Applied Sciences 12 24 12784
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic artificial intelligence
convolutional neural networks
lateral cephalometric radiographs
diagnostics
spellingShingle artificial intelligence
convolutional neural networks
lateral cephalometric radiographs
diagnostics
Moshe Davidovitch
Tatiana Sella-Tunis
Liat Abramovicz
Shoshana Reiter
Shlomo Matalon
Nir Shpack
Verification of Convolutional Neural Network Cephalometric Landmark Identification
topic_facet artificial intelligence
convolutional neural networks
lateral cephalometric radiographs
diagnostics
description Introduction: The mass-harvesting of digitized medical data has prompted their use as a clinical and research tool. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and reliability of artificial intelligence derived cephalometric landmark identification with that of human observers. Methods: Ten pre-treatment digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were randomly selected from a university post-graduate clinic. The x- and y-coordinates of 21 (i.e., 42 points) hard and soft tissue landmarks were identified by 6 specialists, 19 residents, 4 imaging technicians, and a commercially available convolutional neural network artificial intelligence platform (CephX, Orca Dental, Hertzylia, Israel). Wilcoxon, Spearman and Bartlett tests were performed to compare agreement of human and AI landmark identification. Results: Six x- or y-coordinates (14.28%) were found to be statistically different, with only one being outside the 2 mm range of acceptable error, and with 97.6% of coordinates found to be within this range. Conclusions: The use of convolutional neural network artificial intelligence as a tool for cephalometric landmark identification was found to be highly accurate and can serve as an aid in orthodontic diagnosis.
format Text
author Moshe Davidovitch
Tatiana Sella-Tunis
Liat Abramovicz
Shoshana Reiter
Shlomo Matalon
Nir Shpack
author_facet Moshe Davidovitch
Tatiana Sella-Tunis
Liat Abramovicz
Shoshana Reiter
Shlomo Matalon
Nir Shpack
author_sort Moshe Davidovitch
title Verification of Convolutional Neural Network Cephalometric Landmark Identification
title_short Verification of Convolutional Neural Network Cephalometric Landmark Identification
title_full Verification of Convolutional Neural Network Cephalometric Landmark Identification
title_fullStr Verification of Convolutional Neural Network Cephalometric Landmark Identification
title_full_unstemmed Verification of Convolutional Neural Network Cephalometric Landmark Identification
title_sort verification of convolutional neural network cephalometric landmark identification
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412784
op_coverage agris
genre Orca
genre_facet Orca
op_source Applied Sciences; Volume 12; Issue 24; Pages: 12784
op_relation Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app122412784
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412784
container_title Applied Sciences
container_volume 12
container_issue 24
container_start_page 12784
_version_ 1774721800375107584