Knud Rasmussen Glacier Status Analysis Based on Historical Data and Moving Detection Using RPAS

This article discusses partial results of an international scientific expedition to Greenland that researched the geography, geodesy, botany, and glaciology of the area. The results here focus on the photogrammetrical results obtained with the eBee drone in the eastern part of Greenland at the front...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Sciences
Main Authors: Karel Pavelka, Jaroslav Šedina
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021
Subjects:
Bee
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020754
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3417/11/2/754/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3417/11/2/754/ 2023-08-20T04:06:41+02:00 Knud Rasmussen Glacier Status Analysis Based on Historical Data and Moving Detection Using RPAS Karel Pavelka Jaroslav Šedina agris 2021-01-14 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020754 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Earth Sciences and Geography https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11020754 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Applied Sciences; Volume 11; Issue 2; Pages: 754 photogrammetry RPAS CloudCompare Bee Greenland Knud Rasmussen Glacier Text 2021 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020754 2023-08-01T00:51:58Z This article discusses partial results of an international scientific expedition to Greenland that researched the geography, geodesy, botany, and glaciology of the area. The results here focus on the photogrammetrical results obtained with the eBee drone in the eastern part of Greenland at the front of the Knud Rasmussen Glacier and the use of archive image data for monitoring the condition of this glacier. In these short-term visits to the site, the possibility of using a drone is discussed and the results show not only the flow speed of the glacier but also the shape and structure from a height of up to 200 m. From two overflights near the glacier front at different times, it was possible to obtain the speed of the glacier flow and the distribution of velocities in the glacier stream. The technology uses a comparison of two point clouds derived from a set of aerial photos taken with the eBee drone, and calculating the M3C2 (Multiscale Model-to-Model Cloud Comparison) distances with CloudCompare software. The results correlate with other measurement methods like accurate and long-term measurement with Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), satellite radar, or ground geodetical technology. The resulting speed from the drone data reached in the middle part of the glacier, was approximately 12–15m per day. The second part of the paper focuses on the analysis of modern satellite images of the Knud Rasmussen Glacier from Google Earth (Landsat series 1984–2016) and Sentinel 2a, and a comparison with historical aerial images from 1932 to 1933. Historical images were processed photogrammetrically into a three-dimensional (3D) model. Finally, orthogonalized image data from three systems (drone photos, historical aerial photos, and satellite data) were compared in the ArcGIS software. This allows us to analyze glacier changes over time in the time span from 1932 to 2020, with the caveat that from 1933 to 1983 we did not have data at our disposal. The result shows that more significant changes in the area of this ... Text glacier Greenland MDPI Open Access Publishing Greenland Rasmussen ENVELOPE(-64.084,-64.084,-65.248,-65.248) Applied Sciences 11 2 754
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic photogrammetry
RPAS
CloudCompare
Bee
Greenland
Knud Rasmussen Glacier
spellingShingle photogrammetry
RPAS
CloudCompare
Bee
Greenland
Knud Rasmussen Glacier
Karel Pavelka
Jaroslav Šedina
Knud Rasmussen Glacier Status Analysis Based on Historical Data and Moving Detection Using RPAS
topic_facet photogrammetry
RPAS
CloudCompare
Bee
Greenland
Knud Rasmussen Glacier
description This article discusses partial results of an international scientific expedition to Greenland that researched the geography, geodesy, botany, and glaciology of the area. The results here focus on the photogrammetrical results obtained with the eBee drone in the eastern part of Greenland at the front of the Knud Rasmussen Glacier and the use of archive image data for monitoring the condition of this glacier. In these short-term visits to the site, the possibility of using a drone is discussed and the results show not only the flow speed of the glacier but also the shape and structure from a height of up to 200 m. From two overflights near the glacier front at different times, it was possible to obtain the speed of the glacier flow and the distribution of velocities in the glacier stream. The technology uses a comparison of two point clouds derived from a set of aerial photos taken with the eBee drone, and calculating the M3C2 (Multiscale Model-to-Model Cloud Comparison) distances with CloudCompare software. The results correlate with other measurement methods like accurate and long-term measurement with Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), satellite radar, or ground geodetical technology. The resulting speed from the drone data reached in the middle part of the glacier, was approximately 12–15m per day. The second part of the paper focuses on the analysis of modern satellite images of the Knud Rasmussen Glacier from Google Earth (Landsat series 1984–2016) and Sentinel 2a, and a comparison with historical aerial images from 1932 to 1933. Historical images were processed photogrammetrically into a three-dimensional (3D) model. Finally, orthogonalized image data from three systems (drone photos, historical aerial photos, and satellite data) were compared in the ArcGIS software. This allows us to analyze glacier changes over time in the time span from 1932 to 2020, with the caveat that from 1933 to 1983 we did not have data at our disposal. The result shows that more significant changes in the area of this ...
format Text
author Karel Pavelka
Jaroslav Šedina
author_facet Karel Pavelka
Jaroslav Šedina
author_sort Karel Pavelka
title Knud Rasmussen Glacier Status Analysis Based on Historical Data and Moving Detection Using RPAS
title_short Knud Rasmussen Glacier Status Analysis Based on Historical Data and Moving Detection Using RPAS
title_full Knud Rasmussen Glacier Status Analysis Based on Historical Data and Moving Detection Using RPAS
title_fullStr Knud Rasmussen Glacier Status Analysis Based on Historical Data and Moving Detection Using RPAS
title_full_unstemmed Knud Rasmussen Glacier Status Analysis Based on Historical Data and Moving Detection Using RPAS
title_sort knud rasmussen glacier status analysis based on historical data and moving detection using rpas
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020754
op_coverage agris
long_lat ENVELOPE(-64.084,-64.084,-65.248,-65.248)
geographic Greenland
Rasmussen
geographic_facet Greenland
Rasmussen
genre glacier
Greenland
genre_facet glacier
Greenland
op_source Applied Sciences; Volume 11; Issue 2; Pages: 754
op_relation Earth Sciences and Geography
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11020754
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020754
container_title Applied Sciences
container_volume 11
container_issue 2
container_start_page 754
_version_ 1774717961707192320