Stamping Tool Conditions Diagnosis: A Deep Metric Learning Approach

Stamping processes remain crucial in manufacturing processes; therefore, diagnosing the condition of stamping tools is critical. One of the challenges in diagnosing stamping tool conditions is that traditionally, the tools need to be visually checked, and the production processes thus need to be hal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Sciences
Main Authors: Zaky Dzulfikri, Pin-Wei Su, Chih-Yung Huang
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156959
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3417/11/15/6959/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3417/11/15/6959/ 2023-08-20T04:06:09+02:00 Stamping Tool Conditions Diagnosis: A Deep Metric Learning Approach Zaky Dzulfikri Pin-Wei Su Chih-Yung Huang agris 2021-07-28 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156959 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Mechanical Engineering https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11156959 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Applied Sciences; Volume 11; Issue 15; Pages: 6959 deep metric learning (DML) stamping tool triplet network siamese network Text 2021 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156959 2023-08-01T02:18:13Z Stamping processes remain crucial in manufacturing processes; therefore, diagnosing the condition of stamping tools is critical. One of the challenges in diagnosing stamping tool conditions is that traditionally, the tools need to be visually checked, and the production processes thus need to be halted. With the development of Industry 4.0, intelligent monitoring systems have been developed by using accelerometers and algorithms to diagnose the wear classification of stamping tools. Although several deep learning models such as the convolutional neural network (CNN), auto encoder (AE), and recurrent neural network (RNN) models have demonstrated promising results for classifying complex signals including accelerometer signals, the practicality of those methods are restricted due to the flexibility of adding new classes and low accuracy when faced to low numbers of samples per class. In this study, we applied deep metric learning (DML) methods to overcome these problems. DML involves extracting meaningful features using feature extraction modules to map inputs into embedding features. We compared the probability method, the contrastive method, and a triplet network to determine which method was most suitable for our case. The experimental results revealed that, compared with other models, a triplet network can be more effectively trained with limited training data. The triplet network demonstrated the best test results of the compared methods in the noised test data. Finally, when tested using unseen class, the triplet network and the probability method demonstrated similar results. Text DML MDPI Open Access Publishing Applied Sciences 11 15 6959
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic deep metric learning (DML)
stamping tool
triplet network
siamese network
spellingShingle deep metric learning (DML)
stamping tool
triplet network
siamese network
Zaky Dzulfikri
Pin-Wei Su
Chih-Yung Huang
Stamping Tool Conditions Diagnosis: A Deep Metric Learning Approach
topic_facet deep metric learning (DML)
stamping tool
triplet network
siamese network
description Stamping processes remain crucial in manufacturing processes; therefore, diagnosing the condition of stamping tools is critical. One of the challenges in diagnosing stamping tool conditions is that traditionally, the tools need to be visually checked, and the production processes thus need to be halted. With the development of Industry 4.0, intelligent monitoring systems have been developed by using accelerometers and algorithms to diagnose the wear classification of stamping tools. Although several deep learning models such as the convolutional neural network (CNN), auto encoder (AE), and recurrent neural network (RNN) models have demonstrated promising results for classifying complex signals including accelerometer signals, the practicality of those methods are restricted due to the flexibility of adding new classes and low accuracy when faced to low numbers of samples per class. In this study, we applied deep metric learning (DML) methods to overcome these problems. DML involves extracting meaningful features using feature extraction modules to map inputs into embedding features. We compared the probability method, the contrastive method, and a triplet network to determine which method was most suitable for our case. The experimental results revealed that, compared with other models, a triplet network can be more effectively trained with limited training data. The triplet network demonstrated the best test results of the compared methods in the noised test data. Finally, when tested using unseen class, the triplet network and the probability method demonstrated similar results.
format Text
author Zaky Dzulfikri
Pin-Wei Su
Chih-Yung Huang
author_facet Zaky Dzulfikri
Pin-Wei Su
Chih-Yung Huang
author_sort Zaky Dzulfikri
title Stamping Tool Conditions Diagnosis: A Deep Metric Learning Approach
title_short Stamping Tool Conditions Diagnosis: A Deep Metric Learning Approach
title_full Stamping Tool Conditions Diagnosis: A Deep Metric Learning Approach
title_fullStr Stamping Tool Conditions Diagnosis: A Deep Metric Learning Approach
title_full_unstemmed Stamping Tool Conditions Diagnosis: A Deep Metric Learning Approach
title_sort stamping tool conditions diagnosis: a deep metric learning approach
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156959
op_coverage agris
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_source Applied Sciences; Volume 11; Issue 15; Pages: 6959
op_relation Mechanical Engineering
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11156959
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156959
container_title Applied Sciences
container_volume 11
container_issue 15
container_start_page 6959
_version_ 1774717082307395584