Modeling Dry-Snow Densification without Abrupt Transition

An empirical model for the densification of dry snow has been calibrated using strain-rate data from Pine Island Glacier basin, Antarctica. The model provides for a smooth transition between Stage 1 and Stage 2 densification, and leads to an analytical expression for density as a function of depth....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geosciences
Main Author: Elizabeth Morris
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120464
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3263/8/12/464/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3263/8/12/464/ 2023-08-20T04:00:51+02:00 Modeling Dry-Snow Densification without Abrupt Transition Elizabeth Morris agris 2018-12-07 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120464 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Geophysics https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120464 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Geosciences; Volume 8; Issue 12; Pages: 464 snow models densification Text 2018 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120464 2023-07-31T21:53:37Z An empirical model for the densification of dry snow has been calibrated using strain-rate data from Pine Island Glacier basin, Antarctica. The model provides for a smooth transition between Stage 1 and Stage 2 densification, and leads to an analytical expression for density as a function of depth. It introduces two new parameters with a simple physical basis: transition density ρ T and a scaling factor, M, which controls the extent of the transition zone. The standard (Herron and Langway) parameterization is used for strain rates away from the transition zone. Calibration, though tentative, produces best parameter values of ρ T = 580 kg m − 3 and M = 7 for the region. Using these values, the transition model produces better simulations of snow profiles from Pine Island Glacier basin than the well-established Herron and Langway and Ligtenberg models, both of which postulate abrupt transition. Simulation of density profiles from other sites using M = 7 produces the best values of ρ T = 550 kg m − 3 for a high accumulation site and 530 kg m − 3 for a low accumulation site, suggesting that transition density may vary with climatic conditions. The variation of bubble close-off depth and depth-integrated porosity with mean annual accumulation predicted by the transition model is similar to that predicted by the Simonsen model tuned for Greenland. Text Antarc* Antarctica glacier Greenland Pine Island Pine Island Glacier MDPI Open Access Publishing Greenland Pine Island Glacier ENVELOPE(-101.000,-101.000,-75.000,-75.000) Langway ENVELOPE(-139.783,-139.783,-75.483,-75.483) Geosciences 8 12 464
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic snow models
densification
spellingShingle snow models
densification
Elizabeth Morris
Modeling Dry-Snow Densification without Abrupt Transition
topic_facet snow models
densification
description An empirical model for the densification of dry snow has been calibrated using strain-rate data from Pine Island Glacier basin, Antarctica. The model provides for a smooth transition between Stage 1 and Stage 2 densification, and leads to an analytical expression for density as a function of depth. It introduces two new parameters with a simple physical basis: transition density ρ T and a scaling factor, M, which controls the extent of the transition zone. The standard (Herron and Langway) parameterization is used for strain rates away from the transition zone. Calibration, though tentative, produces best parameter values of ρ T = 580 kg m − 3 and M = 7 for the region. Using these values, the transition model produces better simulations of snow profiles from Pine Island Glacier basin than the well-established Herron and Langway and Ligtenberg models, both of which postulate abrupt transition. Simulation of density profiles from other sites using M = 7 produces the best values of ρ T = 550 kg m − 3 for a high accumulation site and 530 kg m − 3 for a low accumulation site, suggesting that transition density may vary with climatic conditions. The variation of bubble close-off depth and depth-integrated porosity with mean annual accumulation predicted by the transition model is similar to that predicted by the Simonsen model tuned for Greenland.
format Text
author Elizabeth Morris
author_facet Elizabeth Morris
author_sort Elizabeth Morris
title Modeling Dry-Snow Densification without Abrupt Transition
title_short Modeling Dry-Snow Densification without Abrupt Transition
title_full Modeling Dry-Snow Densification without Abrupt Transition
title_fullStr Modeling Dry-Snow Densification without Abrupt Transition
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Dry-Snow Densification without Abrupt Transition
title_sort modeling dry-snow densification without abrupt transition
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120464
op_coverage agris
long_lat ENVELOPE(-101.000,-101.000,-75.000,-75.000)
ENVELOPE(-139.783,-139.783,-75.483,-75.483)
geographic Greenland
Pine Island Glacier
Langway
geographic_facet Greenland
Pine Island Glacier
Langway
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
glacier
Greenland
Pine Island
Pine Island Glacier
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
glacier
Greenland
Pine Island
Pine Island Glacier
op_source Geosciences; Volume 8; Issue 12; Pages: 464
op_relation Geophysics
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120464
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120464
container_title Geosciences
container_volume 8
container_issue 12
container_start_page 464
_version_ 1774720806403702784