Role of Faults in Hydrocarbon Leakage in the Hammerfest Basin, SW Barents Sea: Insights from Seismic Data and Numerical Modelling

Hydrocarbon prospectivity in the Greater Barents Sea remains enigmatic as gas discoveries have dominated over oil in the past three decades. Numerous hydrocarbon-related fluid flow anomalies in the area indicate leakage and redistribution of petroleum in the subsurface. Many questions remain unanswe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geosciences
Main Authors: Ilya Ostanin, Zahie Anka, Rolando Di Primio
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7020028
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3263/7/2/28/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3263/7/2/28/ 2023-08-20T04:05:30+02:00 Role of Faults in Hydrocarbon Leakage in the Hammerfest Basin, SW Barents Sea: Insights from Seismic Data and Numerical Modelling Ilya Ostanin Zahie Anka Rolando Di Primio agris 2017-04-15 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7020028 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Geochemistry https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7020028 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Geosciences; Volume 7; Issue 2; Pages: 28 Hammerfest Basin Barents Sea Snøhvit Albatross Bottom Simulating Reflector (BSR) fault seals petroleum systems modelling glacial cycles hydrocarbon leakage Text 2017 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7020028 2023-07-31T21:05:47Z Hydrocarbon prospectivity in the Greater Barents Sea remains enigmatic as gas discoveries have dominated over oil in the past three decades. Numerous hydrocarbon-related fluid flow anomalies in the area indicate leakage and redistribution of petroleum in the subsurface. Many questions remain unanswered regarding the geological driving factors for leakage from the reservoirs and the response of deep petroleum reservoirs to the Cenozoic exhumation and the Pliocene-Pleistocene glaciations. Based on 2D and 3D seismic data interpretation, we constructed a basin-scale regional 3D petroleum systems model for the Hammerfest Basin (1 km × 1 km grid spacing). A higher resolution model (200 m × 200 m grid spacing) for the Snøhvit and Albatross fields was then nested in the regional model to further our understanding of the subsurface development over geological time. We tested the sensitivity of the modeled petroleum leakage by including and varying fault properties as a function of burial and erosion, namely fault capillary entry pressures and permeability during glacial cycles. In this study, we find that the greatest mass lost from the Jurassic reservoirs occurs during ice unloading, which accounts for a 60%–80% reduction of initial accumulated mass in the reservoirs. Subsequent leakage events show a stepwise decrease of 7%–25% of the remaining mass from the reservoirs. The latest episode of hydrocarbon leakage occurred following the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) when differential loading of Quaternary strata resulted in reservoir tilt and spill. The first modeled hydrocarbon leakage event coincides with a major fluid venting episode at the time of a major Upper Regional angular Unconformity (URU, ~0.8 Ma), evidenced by an abundance of pockmarks at this stratigraphic interval. Our modelling results show that leakage along the faults bounding the reservoir is the dominant mechanism for hydrocarbon leakage and is in agreement with observed shallow gas leakage indicators of gas chimneys, pockmarks and fluid escape pipes. We ... Text Barents Sea Hammerfest Hammerfest Basin Snøhvit MDPI Open Access Publishing Barents Sea Geosciences 7 2 28
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic Hammerfest Basin
Barents Sea
Snøhvit
Albatross
Bottom Simulating Reflector (BSR)
fault seals
petroleum systems modelling
glacial cycles
hydrocarbon leakage
spellingShingle Hammerfest Basin
Barents Sea
Snøhvit
Albatross
Bottom Simulating Reflector (BSR)
fault seals
petroleum systems modelling
glacial cycles
hydrocarbon leakage
Ilya Ostanin
Zahie Anka
Rolando Di Primio
Role of Faults in Hydrocarbon Leakage in the Hammerfest Basin, SW Barents Sea: Insights from Seismic Data and Numerical Modelling
topic_facet Hammerfest Basin
Barents Sea
Snøhvit
Albatross
Bottom Simulating Reflector (BSR)
fault seals
petroleum systems modelling
glacial cycles
hydrocarbon leakage
description Hydrocarbon prospectivity in the Greater Barents Sea remains enigmatic as gas discoveries have dominated over oil in the past three decades. Numerous hydrocarbon-related fluid flow anomalies in the area indicate leakage and redistribution of petroleum in the subsurface. Many questions remain unanswered regarding the geological driving factors for leakage from the reservoirs and the response of deep petroleum reservoirs to the Cenozoic exhumation and the Pliocene-Pleistocene glaciations. Based on 2D and 3D seismic data interpretation, we constructed a basin-scale regional 3D petroleum systems model for the Hammerfest Basin (1 km × 1 km grid spacing). A higher resolution model (200 m × 200 m grid spacing) for the Snøhvit and Albatross fields was then nested in the regional model to further our understanding of the subsurface development over geological time. We tested the sensitivity of the modeled petroleum leakage by including and varying fault properties as a function of burial and erosion, namely fault capillary entry pressures and permeability during glacial cycles. In this study, we find that the greatest mass lost from the Jurassic reservoirs occurs during ice unloading, which accounts for a 60%–80% reduction of initial accumulated mass in the reservoirs. Subsequent leakage events show a stepwise decrease of 7%–25% of the remaining mass from the reservoirs. The latest episode of hydrocarbon leakage occurred following the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) when differential loading of Quaternary strata resulted in reservoir tilt and spill. The first modeled hydrocarbon leakage event coincides with a major fluid venting episode at the time of a major Upper Regional angular Unconformity (URU, ~0.8 Ma), evidenced by an abundance of pockmarks at this stratigraphic interval. Our modelling results show that leakage along the faults bounding the reservoir is the dominant mechanism for hydrocarbon leakage and is in agreement with observed shallow gas leakage indicators of gas chimneys, pockmarks and fluid escape pipes. We ...
format Text
author Ilya Ostanin
Zahie Anka
Rolando Di Primio
author_facet Ilya Ostanin
Zahie Anka
Rolando Di Primio
author_sort Ilya Ostanin
title Role of Faults in Hydrocarbon Leakage in the Hammerfest Basin, SW Barents Sea: Insights from Seismic Data and Numerical Modelling
title_short Role of Faults in Hydrocarbon Leakage in the Hammerfest Basin, SW Barents Sea: Insights from Seismic Data and Numerical Modelling
title_full Role of Faults in Hydrocarbon Leakage in the Hammerfest Basin, SW Barents Sea: Insights from Seismic Data and Numerical Modelling
title_fullStr Role of Faults in Hydrocarbon Leakage in the Hammerfest Basin, SW Barents Sea: Insights from Seismic Data and Numerical Modelling
title_full_unstemmed Role of Faults in Hydrocarbon Leakage in the Hammerfest Basin, SW Barents Sea: Insights from Seismic Data and Numerical Modelling
title_sort role of faults in hydrocarbon leakage in the hammerfest basin, sw barents sea: insights from seismic data and numerical modelling
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7020028
op_coverage agris
geographic Barents Sea
geographic_facet Barents Sea
genre Barents Sea
Hammerfest
Hammerfest Basin
Snøhvit
genre_facet Barents Sea
Hammerfest
Hammerfest Basin
Snøhvit
op_source Geosciences; Volume 7; Issue 2; Pages: 28
op_relation Geochemistry
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7020028
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7020028
container_title Geosciences
container_volume 7
container_issue 2
container_start_page 28
_version_ 1774716043080499200