Accuracy of Manual Snow Sampling, Depending on the Sampler’s Cross-Section—A Comparative Study

Snow sampling, either by inserting a tube through the entire snowpack or by taking samples from the vertical profile, is widely applied to measure the snow depth, density, and snow water equivalent (SWE). A comparative study of snow-sampling methods was carried out on 24 March 2022 in Sodankylä, Fin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geosciences
Main Authors: Marko Kaasik, Outi Meinander, Leena Leppänen, Kati Anttila, Pavla Dagsson-Waldhauserova, Anders Ginnerup, Timo Hampinen, Yijing Liu, Andri Gunnarsson, Kirsty Langley, Ali Nadir Arslan
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13070205
_version_ 1821531167491358720
author Marko Kaasik
Outi Meinander
Leena Leppänen
Kati Anttila
Pavla Dagsson-Waldhauserova
Anders Ginnerup
Timo Hampinen
Yijing Liu
Andri Gunnarsson
Kirsty Langley
Ali Nadir Arslan
author_facet Marko Kaasik
Outi Meinander
Leena Leppänen
Kati Anttila
Pavla Dagsson-Waldhauserova
Anders Ginnerup
Timo Hampinen
Yijing Liu
Andri Gunnarsson
Kirsty Langley
Ali Nadir Arslan
author_sort Marko Kaasik
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 7
container_start_page 205
container_title Geosciences
container_volume 13
description Snow sampling, either by inserting a tube through the entire snowpack or by taking samples from the vertical profile, is widely applied to measure the snow depth, density, and snow water equivalent (SWE). A comparative study of snow-sampling methods was carried out on 24 March 2022 in Sodankylä, Finland. Six groups from five countries (Estonia, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, and Sweden) participated, using 12 different snow samplers, including 9 bulk tube samplers and 3 density cutters. The cross-sectional area of the SWE samplers varied from 11 to 100 cm2, while tube length varied from 30 cm to 100 cm. The cross-sectional area of the density profile cutters varied from 100 cm2 to 200 cm2 and the vertical sampling step varied from 5 cm to 10 cm. The samples were taken from snow pits in 55–65-centimeter-deep snow cover in a flat area with sparse pine trees, with the pits at a maximum distance of 10 m from each other. Each tube sampling series consisted of 3–10 vertical columns to ensure statistical validation. The snowpack was relatively soft, with two moderately hard crust layers. The density recorded in the tube sample measurements varied from 218 to 265 kgm−3. The measurement results of SWE, however, varied depending on the sampling equipment used, ranging from 148 to 180 kgm−2, with two outliers of 77 and 106 kgm−2, both with 11 cm2 samplers.
format Text
genre Greenland
Iceland
Sodankylä
genre_facet Greenland
Iceland
Sodankylä
geographic Greenland
Sodankylä
geographic_facet Greenland
Sodankylä
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3263/13/7/205/
institution Open Polar
language English
long_lat ENVELOPE(26.600,26.600,67.417,67.417)
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_coverage agris
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13070205
op_relation Geophysics
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13070205
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_source Geosciences; Volume 13; Issue 7; Pages: 205
publishDate 2023
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3263/13/7/205/ 2025-01-16T22:12:57+00:00 Accuracy of Manual Snow Sampling, Depending on the Sampler’s Cross-Section—A Comparative Study Marko Kaasik Outi Meinander Leena Leppänen Kati Anttila Pavla Dagsson-Waldhauserova Anders Ginnerup Timo Hampinen Yijing Liu Andri Gunnarsson Kirsty Langley Ali Nadir Arslan agris 2023-07-07 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13070205 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Geophysics https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13070205 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Geosciences; Volume 13; Issue 7; Pages: 205 snow cover snow sampling snow water equivalent tube sampler Text 2023 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13070205 2023-08-01T10:47:15Z Snow sampling, either by inserting a tube through the entire snowpack or by taking samples from the vertical profile, is widely applied to measure the snow depth, density, and snow water equivalent (SWE). A comparative study of snow-sampling methods was carried out on 24 March 2022 in Sodankylä, Finland. Six groups from five countries (Estonia, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, and Sweden) participated, using 12 different snow samplers, including 9 bulk tube samplers and 3 density cutters. The cross-sectional area of the SWE samplers varied from 11 to 100 cm2, while tube length varied from 30 cm to 100 cm. The cross-sectional area of the density profile cutters varied from 100 cm2 to 200 cm2 and the vertical sampling step varied from 5 cm to 10 cm. The samples were taken from snow pits in 55–65-centimeter-deep snow cover in a flat area with sparse pine trees, with the pits at a maximum distance of 10 m from each other. Each tube sampling series consisted of 3–10 vertical columns to ensure statistical validation. The snowpack was relatively soft, with two moderately hard crust layers. The density recorded in the tube sample measurements varied from 218 to 265 kgm−3. The measurement results of SWE, however, varied depending on the sampling equipment used, ranging from 148 to 180 kgm−2, with two outliers of 77 and 106 kgm−2, both with 11 cm2 samplers. Text Greenland Iceland Sodankylä MDPI Open Access Publishing Greenland Sodankylä ENVELOPE(26.600,26.600,67.417,67.417) Geosciences 13 7 205
spellingShingle snow cover
snow sampling
snow water equivalent
tube sampler
Marko Kaasik
Outi Meinander
Leena Leppänen
Kati Anttila
Pavla Dagsson-Waldhauserova
Anders Ginnerup
Timo Hampinen
Yijing Liu
Andri Gunnarsson
Kirsty Langley
Ali Nadir Arslan
Accuracy of Manual Snow Sampling, Depending on the Sampler’s Cross-Section—A Comparative Study
title Accuracy of Manual Snow Sampling, Depending on the Sampler’s Cross-Section—A Comparative Study
title_full Accuracy of Manual Snow Sampling, Depending on the Sampler’s Cross-Section—A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Accuracy of Manual Snow Sampling, Depending on the Sampler’s Cross-Section—A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Manual Snow Sampling, Depending on the Sampler’s Cross-Section—A Comparative Study
title_short Accuracy of Manual Snow Sampling, Depending on the Sampler’s Cross-Section—A Comparative Study
title_sort accuracy of manual snow sampling, depending on the sampler’s cross-section—a comparative study
topic snow cover
snow sampling
snow water equivalent
tube sampler
topic_facet snow cover
snow sampling
snow water equivalent
tube sampler
url https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13070205