Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska

Alaska holds more than 68 billion barrels of proved oil reserves and more than 36.7 trillion cubic feet of proved natural gas reserves with some special conditions such as proximity to permafrost, making Alaskan petroleum reserves unique. The low temperature in shallow reservoirs prohibited hydrocar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geosciences
Main Authors: Banabas Dogah, Vahid Atashbari, Mohabbat Ahmadi, Brent Sheets
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3263/11/2/98/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-3263/11/2/98/ 2023-08-20T04:08:38+02:00 Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska Banabas Dogah Vahid Atashbari Mohabbat Ahmadi Brent Sheets agris 2021-02-19 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Geomechanics https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Geosciences; Volume 11; Issue 2; Pages: 98 CO 2 carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery Alaska heavy oil viscous oil North Slope Text 2021 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098 2023-08-01T01:06:36Z Alaska holds more than 68 billion barrels of proved oil reserves and more than 36.7 trillion cubic feet of proved natural gas reserves with some special conditions such as proximity to permafrost, making Alaskan petroleum reserves unique. The low temperature in shallow reservoirs prohibited hydrocarbons’ ideal maturation, thereby generating several heavy and viscous oil accumulations in this state. This also limits the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) options, leaving the thermal methods off the table to avoid permafrost thawing, which can cause wellbore collapse. Several solutions have been attempted for improving oil production from heavy and viscous oil in Alaska; however, they have not yielded the desired recovery, and ultimate recovery factors are still less than the global average. One solution identified as a better alternative is using CO2 as an injecting fluid, alternated by water or mixed with other injectants. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all studies on using CO2 for enhanced oil recovery purposes in Alaska and highlights common and unique challenges this approach may face. The suitability of CO2-EOR methods in the Alaskan oil pools is examined, and a ranking of the oil pools with publicly available data is provided. Text north slope permafrost Alaska MDPI Open Access Publishing Geosciences 11 2 98
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic CO 2
carbon dioxide
enhanced oil recovery
Alaska
heavy oil
viscous oil
North Slope
spellingShingle CO 2
carbon dioxide
enhanced oil recovery
Alaska
heavy oil
viscous oil
North Slope
Banabas Dogah
Vahid Atashbari
Mohabbat Ahmadi
Brent Sheets
Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska
topic_facet CO 2
carbon dioxide
enhanced oil recovery
Alaska
heavy oil
viscous oil
North Slope
description Alaska holds more than 68 billion barrels of proved oil reserves and more than 36.7 trillion cubic feet of proved natural gas reserves with some special conditions such as proximity to permafrost, making Alaskan petroleum reserves unique. The low temperature in shallow reservoirs prohibited hydrocarbons’ ideal maturation, thereby generating several heavy and viscous oil accumulations in this state. This also limits the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) options, leaving the thermal methods off the table to avoid permafrost thawing, which can cause wellbore collapse. Several solutions have been attempted for improving oil production from heavy and viscous oil in Alaska; however, they have not yielded the desired recovery, and ultimate recovery factors are still less than the global average. One solution identified as a better alternative is using CO2 as an injecting fluid, alternated by water or mixed with other injectants. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all studies on using CO2 for enhanced oil recovery purposes in Alaska and highlights common and unique challenges this approach may face. The suitability of CO2-EOR methods in the Alaskan oil pools is examined, and a ranking of the oil pools with publicly available data is provided.
format Text
author Banabas Dogah
Vahid Atashbari
Mohabbat Ahmadi
Brent Sheets
author_facet Banabas Dogah
Vahid Atashbari
Mohabbat Ahmadi
Brent Sheets
author_sort Banabas Dogah
title Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska
title_short Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska
title_full Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska
title_fullStr Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska
title_sort enhanced oil recovery using co2 in alaska
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098
op_coverage agris
genre north slope
permafrost
Alaska
genre_facet north slope
permafrost
Alaska
op_source Geosciences; Volume 11; Issue 2; Pages: 98
op_relation Geomechanics
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020098
container_title Geosciences
container_volume 11
container_issue 2
container_start_page 98
_version_ 1774721031222591488