Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs?

Dogs are the most abundant carnivores on earth and, as such, negatively impact wildlife. Free-ranging dogs roam in many protected areas, which in turn are often tourist destinations. Whether tourists influence their roaming is largely unexplored but highly relevant to wildlife conservation. To addre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animals
Main Authors: Elke Schüttler, Jaime E. Jiménez
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243564
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-2615/12/24/3564/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-2615/12/24/3564/ 2023-08-20T04:05:48+02:00 Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs? Elke Schüttler Jaime E. Jiménez agris 2022-12-16 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243564 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Ecology and Conservation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12243564 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Animals; Volume 12; Issue 24; Pages: 3564 camera-trapping Canis lupus familiaris Chile companion animal invasive predator protected area questionnaire South America wildlife management Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243564 2023-08-01T07:50:17Z Dogs are the most abundant carnivores on earth and, as such, negatively impact wildlife. Free-ranging dogs roam in many protected areas, which in turn are often tourist destinations. Whether tourists influence their roaming is largely unexplored but highly relevant to wildlife conservation. To address this question, we obtained (i) 81 completed questionnaires from tourists on their experience with free-ranging dogs in the remote Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile, and (ii) photographs of three camera-traps placed next to trekking trails (n = 87 trap days). A third of the participants were followed by dogs for up to four days, and 39% saw free-ranging dogs on their hikes, but neither feeding dogs nor fear of them had any influence on whether tourists were followed by dogs. Camera-traps yielded 53 independent dog sequences, recorded 32 individuals plus 14 unidentified dogs, of which only one was leashed, with a frequency of one dog every 28th person. In 17% of 53 sequences, dogs were photographed together with hikers carrying large backpacks for several-day trips. We conclude that tourists are facilitators for the movement of dogs and highlight the importance of the engagement of the tourism sector in wildlife conservation in and close to protected areas. Text Canis lupus MDPI Open Access Publishing Cape Horn ENVELOPE(-135.021,-135.021,61.583,61.583) Animals 12 24 3564
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic camera-trapping
Canis lupus familiaris
Chile
companion animal
invasive predator
protected area
questionnaire
South America
wildlife management
spellingShingle camera-trapping
Canis lupus familiaris
Chile
companion animal
invasive predator
protected area
questionnaire
South America
wildlife management
Elke Schüttler
Jaime E. Jiménez
Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs?
topic_facet camera-trapping
Canis lupus familiaris
Chile
companion animal
invasive predator
protected area
questionnaire
South America
wildlife management
description Dogs are the most abundant carnivores on earth and, as such, negatively impact wildlife. Free-ranging dogs roam in many protected areas, which in turn are often tourist destinations. Whether tourists influence their roaming is largely unexplored but highly relevant to wildlife conservation. To address this question, we obtained (i) 81 completed questionnaires from tourists on their experience with free-ranging dogs in the remote Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile, and (ii) photographs of three camera-traps placed next to trekking trails (n = 87 trap days). A third of the participants were followed by dogs for up to four days, and 39% saw free-ranging dogs on their hikes, but neither feeding dogs nor fear of them had any influence on whether tourists were followed by dogs. Camera-traps yielded 53 independent dog sequences, recorded 32 individuals plus 14 unidentified dogs, of which only one was leashed, with a frequency of one dog every 28th person. In 17% of 53 sequences, dogs were photographed together with hikers carrying large backpacks for several-day trips. We conclude that tourists are facilitators for the movement of dogs and highlight the importance of the engagement of the tourism sector in wildlife conservation in and close to protected areas.
format Text
author Elke Schüttler
Jaime E. Jiménez
author_facet Elke Schüttler
Jaime E. Jiménez
author_sort Elke Schüttler
title Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs?
title_short Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs?
title_full Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs?
title_fullStr Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs?
title_full_unstemmed Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs?
title_sort are tourists facilitators of the movement of free-ranging dogs?
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243564
op_coverage agris
long_lat ENVELOPE(-135.021,-135.021,61.583,61.583)
geographic Cape Horn
geographic_facet Cape Horn
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source Animals; Volume 12; Issue 24; Pages: 3564
op_relation Ecology and Conservation
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12243564
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243564
container_title Animals
container_volume 12
container_issue 24
container_start_page 3564
_version_ 1774716543450480640