Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats

1. Bats are important components of agricultural ecosystems. However, little is known about the extent to which bats use linear features when foraging and commuting in agricultural settings, when compared to the interior of fields. 2. As part of a large-scale citizen science project, bat detectors w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animals
Main Authors: Domhnall Finch, Henry Schofield, Fiona Mathews
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-2615/10/10/1856/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-2615/10/10/1856/ 2023-08-20T04:08:52+02:00 Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats Domhnall Finch Henry Schofield Fiona Mathews agris 2020-10-12 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Ecology and Conservation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Animals; Volume 10; Issue 10; Pages: 1856 agriculture agri-environmental scheme bats connectivity fragmentation habitat degradation hedgerow management Pipistrellus pipistrellus Pipistrellus pygmaeus Rhinolophus ferrumequinum Text 2020 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856 2023-08-01T00:15:35Z 1. Bats are important components of agricultural ecosystems. However, little is known about the extent to which bats use linear features when foraging and commuting in agricultural settings, when compared to the interior of fields. 2. As part of a large-scale citizen science project, bat detectors were placed in the centre of agricultural fields (arable and pasture) and along linear features (intensively managed hedgerows, sympathetically managed hedgerows and treelines). 3. Our results show that all 10 of the bat species groups identified were found both along linear features and in the middle of agricultural fields. Of the five species groups analysed further, all had significantly more bat activity along linear features compared to the middle of fields, except for Nyctalus noctula. However, our results showed that 29% of calls from Rhinolophus ferrumequinum were recorded in the middle of agricultural fields, compared to only 10% for Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Bat activity was more likely to be associated with treelines compared to other linear feature types. 4. Our results highlight the importance of linear feature management to bat conservation, but also the need to consider field centres during survey design and Environmental Impact Assessments. Text Nyctalus noctula Pipistrellus pipistrellus MDPI Open Access Publishing Animals 10 10 1856
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic agriculture
agri-environmental scheme
bats
connectivity
fragmentation
habitat degradation
hedgerow management
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
Pipistrellus pygmaeus
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum
spellingShingle agriculture
agri-environmental scheme
bats
connectivity
fragmentation
habitat degradation
hedgerow management
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
Pipistrellus pygmaeus
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum
Domhnall Finch
Henry Schofield
Fiona Mathews
Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
topic_facet agriculture
agri-environmental scheme
bats
connectivity
fragmentation
habitat degradation
hedgerow management
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
Pipistrellus pygmaeus
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum
description 1. Bats are important components of agricultural ecosystems. However, little is known about the extent to which bats use linear features when foraging and commuting in agricultural settings, when compared to the interior of fields. 2. As part of a large-scale citizen science project, bat detectors were placed in the centre of agricultural fields (arable and pasture) and along linear features (intensively managed hedgerows, sympathetically managed hedgerows and treelines). 3. Our results show that all 10 of the bat species groups identified were found both along linear features and in the middle of agricultural fields. Of the five species groups analysed further, all had significantly more bat activity along linear features compared to the middle of fields, except for Nyctalus noctula. However, our results showed that 29% of calls from Rhinolophus ferrumequinum were recorded in the middle of agricultural fields, compared to only 10% for Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Bat activity was more likely to be associated with treelines compared to other linear feature types. 4. Our results highlight the importance of linear feature management to bat conservation, but also the need to consider field centres during survey design and Environmental Impact Assessments.
format Text
author Domhnall Finch
Henry Schofield
Fiona Mathews
author_facet Domhnall Finch
Henry Schofield
Fiona Mathews
author_sort Domhnall Finch
title Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_short Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_full Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_fullStr Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_full_unstemmed Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_sort habitat associations of bats in an agricultural landscape: linear features versus open habitats
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856
op_coverage agris
genre Nyctalus noctula
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
genre_facet Nyctalus noctula
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
op_source Animals; Volume 10; Issue 10; Pages: 1856
op_relation Ecology and Conservation
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856
container_title Animals
container_volume 10
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1856
_version_ 1774721415135625216