Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Rodents—True or False Threat?

Transmission of pathogenic and resistant bacteria from wildlife to the bacterial gene pool in nature affects the ecosystem. Hence, we studied intestine content of five wild rodent species: the yellow-necked wood mouse (Apodemus flavicollis, n = 121), striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius, n = 75),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pathogens
Main Authors: Magdalena Skarżyńska, Magdalena Zając, Ewelina Kamińska, Arkadiusz Bomba, Jacek Żmudzki, Artur Jabłoński, Dariusz Wasyl
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2020
Subjects:
AMR
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090771
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-0817/9/9/771/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-0817/9/9/771/ 2023-08-20T04:05:59+02:00 Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Rodents—True or False Threat? Magdalena Skarżyńska Magdalena Zając Ewelina Kamińska Arkadiusz Bomba Jacek Żmudzki Artur Jabłoński Dariusz Wasyl agris 2020-09-21 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090771 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Animal Pathogens https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090771 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Pathogens; Volume 9; Issue 9; Pages: 771 rodents AMR Salmonella genotype/phenotype discrepancy Text 2020 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090771 2023-08-01T00:09:00Z Transmission of pathogenic and resistant bacteria from wildlife to the bacterial gene pool in nature affects the ecosystem. Hence, we studied intestine content of five wild rodent species: the yellow-necked wood mouse (Apodemus flavicollis, n = 121), striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius, n = 75), common vole (Microtus arvalis, n = 37), bank vole (Myodes glareolus, n = 3), and house mouse (Mus musculus, n = 1) to assess their potential role as an antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and Salmonella vector. The methods adopted from official AMR monitoring of slaughtered animals were applied and supplemented with colistin resistance screening. Whole-genome sequencing of obtained bacteria elucidated their epidemiological relationships and zoonotic potential. The study revealed no indications of public health relevance of wild rodents from the sampled area in Salmonella spread and their limited role in AMR dissemination. Of 263 recovered E. coli, the vast majority was pan-susceptible, and as few as 5 E. coli showed any resistance. In four colistin-resistant strains neither the known mcr genes nor known mutations in pmr genes were found. One of these strains was tetracycline-resistant due to tet(B). High diversity of virulence factors (n = 43) noted in tested strains including ibeA, cdtB, air, eilA, astA, vat, pic reported in clinically relevant types of enteric E. coli indicate that rodents may be involved in the ecological cycle of these bacteria. Most of the strains represented unique sequence types and ST10805, ST10806, ST10810, ST10824 were revealed for the first time, showing genomic heterogeneity of the strains. The study broadened the knowledge on phylogenetic diversity and structure of the E. coli population in wild rodents. Text Common vole Microtus arvalis MDPI Open Access Publishing Pathogens 9 9 771
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic rodents
AMR
Salmonella
genotype/phenotype discrepancy
spellingShingle rodents
AMR
Salmonella
genotype/phenotype discrepancy
Magdalena Skarżyńska
Magdalena Zając
Ewelina Kamińska
Arkadiusz Bomba
Jacek Żmudzki
Artur Jabłoński
Dariusz Wasyl
Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Rodents—True or False Threat?
topic_facet rodents
AMR
Salmonella
genotype/phenotype discrepancy
description Transmission of pathogenic and resistant bacteria from wildlife to the bacterial gene pool in nature affects the ecosystem. Hence, we studied intestine content of five wild rodent species: the yellow-necked wood mouse (Apodemus flavicollis, n = 121), striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius, n = 75), common vole (Microtus arvalis, n = 37), bank vole (Myodes glareolus, n = 3), and house mouse (Mus musculus, n = 1) to assess their potential role as an antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and Salmonella vector. The methods adopted from official AMR monitoring of slaughtered animals were applied and supplemented with colistin resistance screening. Whole-genome sequencing of obtained bacteria elucidated their epidemiological relationships and zoonotic potential. The study revealed no indications of public health relevance of wild rodents from the sampled area in Salmonella spread and their limited role in AMR dissemination. Of 263 recovered E. coli, the vast majority was pan-susceptible, and as few as 5 E. coli showed any resistance. In four colistin-resistant strains neither the known mcr genes nor known mutations in pmr genes were found. One of these strains was tetracycline-resistant due to tet(B). High diversity of virulence factors (n = 43) noted in tested strains including ibeA, cdtB, air, eilA, astA, vat, pic reported in clinically relevant types of enteric E. coli indicate that rodents may be involved in the ecological cycle of these bacteria. Most of the strains represented unique sequence types and ST10805, ST10806, ST10810, ST10824 were revealed for the first time, showing genomic heterogeneity of the strains. The study broadened the knowledge on phylogenetic diversity and structure of the E. coli population in wild rodents.
format Text
author Magdalena Skarżyńska
Magdalena Zając
Ewelina Kamińska
Arkadiusz Bomba
Jacek Żmudzki
Artur Jabłoński
Dariusz Wasyl
author_facet Magdalena Skarżyńska
Magdalena Zając
Ewelina Kamińska
Arkadiusz Bomba
Jacek Żmudzki
Artur Jabłoński
Dariusz Wasyl
author_sort Magdalena Skarżyńska
title Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Rodents—True or False Threat?
title_short Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Rodents—True or False Threat?
title_full Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Rodents—True or False Threat?
title_fullStr Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Rodents—True or False Threat?
title_full_unstemmed Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wild Rodents—True or False Threat?
title_sort salmonella and antimicrobial resistance in wild rodents—true or false threat?
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090771
op_coverage agris
genre Common vole
Microtus arvalis
genre_facet Common vole
Microtus arvalis
op_source Pathogens; Volume 9; Issue 9; Pages: 771
op_relation Animal Pathogens
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090771
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090771
container_title Pathogens
container_volume 9
container_issue 9
container_start_page 771
_version_ 1774716823013425152