(Human-Inflected) Evolution in an Age of (Human-Induced) Extinction: Synthetic Biology Meets the Anthropocene

At the advent of the Anthropocene, life is being pushed to its limits the world over; we are currently living through the Sixth Mass Extinction to occur since multicellular life first emerged on the planet 570 million years ago. Evolutionary biologist E.O. Wilson sums up this push in the opening gam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Humanities
Main Author: Josh Wodak
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040126
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-0787/9/4/126/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-0787/9/4/126/ 2023-08-20T04:01:00+02:00 (Human-Inflected) Evolution in an Age of (Human-Induced) Extinction: Synthetic Biology Meets the Anthropocene Josh Wodak 2020-10-23 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040126 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Transdisciplinary Humanities https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/h9040126 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Humanities; Volume 9; Issue 4; Pages: 126 cultural imaginary environmental humanities environmental ethics synthetic biology conservation biology microbiology Anthropocene evolution Text 2020 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040126 2023-08-01T00:20:08Z At the advent of the Anthropocene, life is being pushed to its limits the world over; we are currently living through the Sixth Mass Extinction to occur since multicellular life first emerged on the planet 570 million years ago. Evolutionary biologist E.O. Wilson sums up this push in the opening gambit of his book The Future of Life: “the race is now on between the techno-scientific forces that are destroying the living environment and those that can be harnessed to save it”. Contra Wilson, this paper addresses the paradox arising from proposals to harness “techno-scientific forces … to save” the “living environment” while other forces continue to destroy it. By framing human-inflected evolution in an age of human-induced extinction, this article asks what could or should conservation become, if ‘conserving’ imperiled species might now require genetic interventions of the synthetic kind. Drawing upon recent key markers of “the race”, this paper presents a notional conservation for the Anthropocene—namely, that such a conservation proposes active intervention not only into ecosystems but into evolution itself. And yet, such interventions can only be considered in the context of the planetary scale that is the Anthropocene-writ-large, as per the desertification of the Amazon or the collapse of Antarctic ice sheets, the spatial scale of the microbial world, and on the temporal scale of evolution. Viewed within such a context, this paper presents technoscientific conservation as paradoxically being both vital and futile, as well as timely and too late. Text Antarc* Antarctic MDPI Open Access Publishing Antarctic Humanities 9 4 126
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic cultural imaginary
environmental humanities
environmental ethics
synthetic biology
conservation biology
microbiology
Anthropocene evolution
spellingShingle cultural imaginary
environmental humanities
environmental ethics
synthetic biology
conservation biology
microbiology
Anthropocene evolution
Josh Wodak
(Human-Inflected) Evolution in an Age of (Human-Induced) Extinction: Synthetic Biology Meets the Anthropocene
topic_facet cultural imaginary
environmental humanities
environmental ethics
synthetic biology
conservation biology
microbiology
Anthropocene evolution
description At the advent of the Anthropocene, life is being pushed to its limits the world over; we are currently living through the Sixth Mass Extinction to occur since multicellular life first emerged on the planet 570 million years ago. Evolutionary biologist E.O. Wilson sums up this push in the opening gambit of his book The Future of Life: “the race is now on between the techno-scientific forces that are destroying the living environment and those that can be harnessed to save it”. Contra Wilson, this paper addresses the paradox arising from proposals to harness “techno-scientific forces … to save” the “living environment” while other forces continue to destroy it. By framing human-inflected evolution in an age of human-induced extinction, this article asks what could or should conservation become, if ‘conserving’ imperiled species might now require genetic interventions of the synthetic kind. Drawing upon recent key markers of “the race”, this paper presents a notional conservation for the Anthropocene—namely, that such a conservation proposes active intervention not only into ecosystems but into evolution itself. And yet, such interventions can only be considered in the context of the planetary scale that is the Anthropocene-writ-large, as per the desertification of the Amazon or the collapse of Antarctic ice sheets, the spatial scale of the microbial world, and on the temporal scale of evolution. Viewed within such a context, this paper presents technoscientific conservation as paradoxically being both vital and futile, as well as timely and too late.
format Text
author Josh Wodak
author_facet Josh Wodak
author_sort Josh Wodak
title (Human-Inflected) Evolution in an Age of (Human-Induced) Extinction: Synthetic Biology Meets the Anthropocene
title_short (Human-Inflected) Evolution in an Age of (Human-Induced) Extinction: Synthetic Biology Meets the Anthropocene
title_full (Human-Inflected) Evolution in an Age of (Human-Induced) Extinction: Synthetic Biology Meets the Anthropocene
title_fullStr (Human-Inflected) Evolution in an Age of (Human-Induced) Extinction: Synthetic Biology Meets the Anthropocene
title_full_unstemmed (Human-Inflected) Evolution in an Age of (Human-Induced) Extinction: Synthetic Biology Meets the Anthropocene
title_sort (human-inflected) evolution in an age of (human-induced) extinction: synthetic biology meets the anthropocene
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040126
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source Humanities; Volume 9; Issue 4; Pages: 126
op_relation Transdisciplinary Humanities
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/h9040126
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040126
container_title Humanities
container_volume 9
container_issue 4
container_start_page 126
_version_ 1774721950509170688