Comparison of the World’s Best Pension Systems: The Lesson for Indonesia

Iceland and the Netherlands presently have the best pension systems in the world, according to the Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index 2021. In the meantime, Indonesia ranked 35th. This study compares and analyzes Iceland’s and the Netherlands’ current pension systems as the finest in the worl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social Sciences
Main Authors: Abdul Hadi, Emese Bruder, Widhayani Puri Setioningtyas
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100435
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-0760/11/10/435/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2076-0760/11/10/435/ 2023-08-20T04:07:19+02:00 Comparison of the World’s Best Pension Systems: The Lesson for Indonesia Abdul Hadi Emese Bruder Widhayani Puri Setioningtyas 2022-09-23 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100435 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100435 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Social Sciences; Volume 11; Issue 10; Pages: 435 pension system pension reform Indonesia Iceland The Netherlands Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100435 2023-08-01T06:35:42Z Iceland and the Netherlands presently have the best pension systems in the world, according to the Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index 2021. In the meantime, Indonesia ranked 35th. This study compares and analyzes Iceland’s and the Netherlands’ current pension systems as the finest in the world, as well as the future threats to their pension systems, and applies the lessons learned from both nations to Indonesia, which intends to alter its public pension system. According to a comparative analysis of Iceland, the Netherlands, and Indonesia, the overall pension systems of Iceland and the Netherlands are advantageous for ensuring adequacy and sustainability of the pension system. However, Iceland and the Netherlands may suffer adequacy and sustainability issues in the long run. As a result, they should continue to evaluate their own countries’ present structures, notably in demographics. Concerning the Indonesia pension system, Indonesia policymakers should consider enforcing the social security system, since these systems have enabled Iceland and the Netherlands to have lower poverty rates. Furthermore, the Indonesian government should strengthen the existing PAYG and DB pension systems, raise the minimum pension eligibility age, contribute to the system regularly, and apply the cost-of-living adjustments to improve the adequacy and sustainability of the civil service pension system. Simultaneously, civil servants should contribute more to ensure the long-term viability of this pension system. The Indonesian government should implement such adjustments, as they would enhance budgetary sustainability in the long run. Text Iceland MDPI Open Access Publishing Mercer ENVELOPE(65.647,65.647,-70.227,-70.227) Social Sciences 11 10 435
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic pension system
pension reform
Indonesia
Iceland
The Netherlands
spellingShingle pension system
pension reform
Indonesia
Iceland
The Netherlands
Abdul Hadi
Emese Bruder
Widhayani Puri Setioningtyas
Comparison of the World’s Best Pension Systems: The Lesson for Indonesia
topic_facet pension system
pension reform
Indonesia
Iceland
The Netherlands
description Iceland and the Netherlands presently have the best pension systems in the world, according to the Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index 2021. In the meantime, Indonesia ranked 35th. This study compares and analyzes Iceland’s and the Netherlands’ current pension systems as the finest in the world, as well as the future threats to their pension systems, and applies the lessons learned from both nations to Indonesia, which intends to alter its public pension system. According to a comparative analysis of Iceland, the Netherlands, and Indonesia, the overall pension systems of Iceland and the Netherlands are advantageous for ensuring adequacy and sustainability of the pension system. However, Iceland and the Netherlands may suffer adequacy and sustainability issues in the long run. As a result, they should continue to evaluate their own countries’ present structures, notably in demographics. Concerning the Indonesia pension system, Indonesia policymakers should consider enforcing the social security system, since these systems have enabled Iceland and the Netherlands to have lower poverty rates. Furthermore, the Indonesian government should strengthen the existing PAYG and DB pension systems, raise the minimum pension eligibility age, contribute to the system regularly, and apply the cost-of-living adjustments to improve the adequacy and sustainability of the civil service pension system. Simultaneously, civil servants should contribute more to ensure the long-term viability of this pension system. The Indonesian government should implement such adjustments, as they would enhance budgetary sustainability in the long run.
format Text
author Abdul Hadi
Emese Bruder
Widhayani Puri Setioningtyas
author_facet Abdul Hadi
Emese Bruder
Widhayani Puri Setioningtyas
author_sort Abdul Hadi
title Comparison of the World’s Best Pension Systems: The Lesson for Indonesia
title_short Comparison of the World’s Best Pension Systems: The Lesson for Indonesia
title_full Comparison of the World’s Best Pension Systems: The Lesson for Indonesia
title_fullStr Comparison of the World’s Best Pension Systems: The Lesson for Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the World’s Best Pension Systems: The Lesson for Indonesia
title_sort comparison of the world’s best pension systems: the lesson for indonesia
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100435
long_lat ENVELOPE(65.647,65.647,-70.227,-70.227)
geographic Mercer
geographic_facet Mercer
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Social Sciences; Volume 11; Issue 10; Pages: 435
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100435
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100435
container_title Social Sciences
container_volume 11
container_issue 10
container_start_page 435
_version_ 1774718874120355840