How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts

This study provides an overview of how sacred natural sites are given recognition within the World Heritage system. It offers an analysis of the extent to which sacred natural sites that are part of nine World Heritage sites are recognised in site nomination files, management plans, and governance o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land
Main Authors: Bas Verschuuren, Alison Ormsby, Wendy Jackson
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-445X/11/1/97/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-445X/11/1/97/ 2023-08-20T04:01:05+02:00 How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts Bas Verschuuren Alison Ormsby Wendy Jackson agris 2022-01-07 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Landscape Ecology https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land11010097 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Land; Volume 11; Issue 1; Pages: 97 sacred natural sites World Heritage sites spiritual values cultural values intangible values protected areas heritage conservation biocultural conservation Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097 2023-08-01T03:46:31Z This study provides an overview of how sacred natural sites are given recognition within the World Heritage system. It offers an analysis of the extent to which sacred natural sites that are part of nine World Heritage sites are recognised in site nomination files, management plans, and governance of these sites. The World Heritage sites are located across all continents except for Antarctica. We analysed sites in Australia, Greece, Guatemala, India, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia, New Zealand and the Russian Federation. We found that the cultural and spiritual significance of sacred natural sites is under-recognised, especially in natural World Heritage sites. In addition, Indigenous and religious custodians are frequently excluded from site management and governance. We make four recommendations for improving the recognition of sacred natural sites and the involvement of their custodians in the World Heritage process and in site nomination, governance, and management: (1) identification and recognition of sacred natural sites including their associated cultural and spiritual values; (2) recognition of, and articulated roles for custodians of sacred natural sites in the governance and management of World Heritage sites; (3) increased uptake of religious groups and Indigenous Peoples’ conservation approaches to the joint management of World Heritage sites that contain sacred natural sites, and (4) prevention of exclusion of custodians and ecological migration by applying inclusive conservation practices through rights-based approaches. Text Antarc* Antarctica MDPI Open Access Publishing New Zealand Land 11 1 97
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic sacred natural sites
World Heritage sites
spiritual values
cultural values
intangible values
protected areas
heritage conservation
biocultural conservation
spellingShingle sacred natural sites
World Heritage sites
spiritual values
cultural values
intangible values
protected areas
heritage conservation
biocultural conservation
Bas Verschuuren
Alison Ormsby
Wendy Jackson
How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
topic_facet sacred natural sites
World Heritage sites
spiritual values
cultural values
intangible values
protected areas
heritage conservation
biocultural conservation
description This study provides an overview of how sacred natural sites are given recognition within the World Heritage system. It offers an analysis of the extent to which sacred natural sites that are part of nine World Heritage sites are recognised in site nomination files, management plans, and governance of these sites. The World Heritage sites are located across all continents except for Antarctica. We analysed sites in Australia, Greece, Guatemala, India, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia, New Zealand and the Russian Federation. We found that the cultural and spiritual significance of sacred natural sites is under-recognised, especially in natural World Heritage sites. In addition, Indigenous and religious custodians are frequently excluded from site management and governance. We make four recommendations for improving the recognition of sacred natural sites and the involvement of their custodians in the World Heritage process and in site nomination, governance, and management: (1) identification and recognition of sacred natural sites including their associated cultural and spiritual values; (2) recognition of, and articulated roles for custodians of sacred natural sites in the governance and management of World Heritage sites; (3) increased uptake of religious groups and Indigenous Peoples’ conservation approaches to the joint management of World Heritage sites that contain sacred natural sites, and (4) prevention of exclusion of custodians and ecological migration by applying inclusive conservation practices through rights-based approaches.
format Text
author Bas Verschuuren
Alison Ormsby
Wendy Jackson
author_facet Bas Verschuuren
Alison Ormsby
Wendy Jackson
author_sort Bas Verschuuren
title How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
title_short How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
title_full How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
title_fullStr How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
title_full_unstemmed How Might World Heritage Status Support the Protection of Sacred Natural Sites? An Analysis of Nomination Files, Management, and Governance Contexts
title_sort how might world heritage status support the protection of sacred natural sites? an analysis of nomination files, management, and governance contexts
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097
op_coverage agris
geographic New Zealand
geographic_facet New Zealand
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Land; Volume 11; Issue 1; Pages: 97
op_relation Landscape Ecology
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land11010097
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010097
container_title Land
container_volume 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
_version_ 1774722568275623936