Evaluation of IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation-Phase Partitioning on the Global Scale

The precipitation phase (i.e., rain and snow) is important for the global hydrologic cycle and climate system. The objective of this study is to evaluate the precipitation-phase partitioning capabilities of remote sensing and reanalysis modeling methods on the global scale. Specifically, observation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water
Main Authors: Wentao Xiong, Guoqiang Tang, Tsechun Wang, Ziqiang Ma, Wei Wan
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071122
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4441/14/7/1122/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4441/14/7/1122/ 2023-08-20T04:02:13+02:00 Evaluation of IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation-Phase Partitioning on the Global Scale Wentao Xiong Guoqiang Tang Tsechun Wang Ziqiang Ma Wei Wan agris 2022-03-31 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071122 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Hydrology https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w14071122 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Water; Volume 14; Issue 7; Pages: 1122 snowfall precipitation phase temperature NCEP ADP statistical evaluation Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071122 2023-08-01T04:38:09Z The precipitation phase (i.e., rain and snow) is important for the global hydrologic cycle and climate system. The objective of this study is to evaluate the precipitation-phase partitioning capabilities of remote sensing and reanalysis modeling methods on the global scale. Specifically, observation data from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Automated Data Processing (ADP), from 2000 to 2007, are used to evaluate the rain–snow discrimination accuracy of the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) and the fifth-generation reanalysis product of the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ERA5). The results show that: (1) the ERA5 performs better than the IMERG at distinguishing rainfall and snowfall events, overall. (2) The ERA5 has high accuracy in all continents except for South America, while the IMERG performs well only in Antarctica and North America. (3) Compared with the IMERG, the ERA5 can more effectively capture snowfall events at high latitudes but shows worse performance at mid-low latitude regions. Both the IMERG and ERA5 have lower accuracy for rain–snow partitioning under heavy precipitation. Overall, the results of this study provide references for the application and improvement of global rain–snow partitioning products. Text Antarc* Antarctica MDPI Open Access Publishing Water 14 7 1122
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic snowfall
precipitation phase
temperature
NCEP ADP
statistical evaluation
spellingShingle snowfall
precipitation phase
temperature
NCEP ADP
statistical evaluation
Wentao Xiong
Guoqiang Tang
Tsechun Wang
Ziqiang Ma
Wei Wan
Evaluation of IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation-Phase Partitioning on the Global Scale
topic_facet snowfall
precipitation phase
temperature
NCEP ADP
statistical evaluation
description The precipitation phase (i.e., rain and snow) is important for the global hydrologic cycle and climate system. The objective of this study is to evaluate the precipitation-phase partitioning capabilities of remote sensing and reanalysis modeling methods on the global scale. Specifically, observation data from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Automated Data Processing (ADP), from 2000 to 2007, are used to evaluate the rain–snow discrimination accuracy of the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) and the fifth-generation reanalysis product of the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ERA5). The results show that: (1) the ERA5 performs better than the IMERG at distinguishing rainfall and snowfall events, overall. (2) The ERA5 has high accuracy in all continents except for South America, while the IMERG performs well only in Antarctica and North America. (3) Compared with the IMERG, the ERA5 can more effectively capture snowfall events at high latitudes but shows worse performance at mid-low latitude regions. Both the IMERG and ERA5 have lower accuracy for rain–snow partitioning under heavy precipitation. Overall, the results of this study provide references for the application and improvement of global rain–snow partitioning products.
format Text
author Wentao Xiong
Guoqiang Tang
Tsechun Wang
Ziqiang Ma
Wei Wan
author_facet Wentao Xiong
Guoqiang Tang
Tsechun Wang
Ziqiang Ma
Wei Wan
author_sort Wentao Xiong
title Evaluation of IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation-Phase Partitioning on the Global Scale
title_short Evaluation of IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation-Phase Partitioning on the Global Scale
title_full Evaluation of IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation-Phase Partitioning on the Global Scale
title_fullStr Evaluation of IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation-Phase Partitioning on the Global Scale
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation-Phase Partitioning on the Global Scale
title_sort evaluation of imerg and era5 precipitation-phase partitioning on the global scale
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071122
op_coverage agris
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Water; Volume 14; Issue 7; Pages: 1122
op_relation Hydrology
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w14071122
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071122
container_title Water
container_volume 14
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1122
_version_ 1774712595022872576