Machine Learning Modeling of Climate Variability Impact on River Runoff

The hypothesis of this study was one of existence of spatially organized links between the time series of river runoff and climate variability indices, describing the oscillations in the atmosphere–ocean system: ENSO (El Niño–Southern Oscillation), PDO (Pacific Decadal Oscillation), AMO (Atlantic Mu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water
Main Authors: Mateusz Norel, Krzysztof Krawiec, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091177
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4441/13/9/1177/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4441/13/9/1177/ 2023-08-20T04:08:23+02:00 Machine Learning Modeling of Climate Variability Impact on River Runoff Mateusz Norel Krzysztof Krawiec Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz agris 2021-04-24 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091177 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Hydrology https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w13091177 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Water; Volume 13; Issue 9; Pages: 1177 river runoff climate variability machine learning Text 2021 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091177 2023-08-01T01:34:43Z The hypothesis of this study was one of existence of spatially organized links between the time series of river runoff and climate variability indices, describing the oscillations in the atmosphere–ocean system: ENSO (El Niño–Southern Oscillation), PDO (Pacific Decadal Oscillation), AMO (Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation), and NAO (North Atlantic Oscillation). The global river flow reconstructions (ERA-20-CM-R) for 18 study areas on six continents and climate variability indices for the period 1901–2010 were used. The split-sample approach was applied, with the period 1901–2000 used for training and 2001–2010 used for testing. The quality measures used in this paper were mean absolute error, dynamic time warping, and top extreme events error. We demonstrated that a machine learning approach (convolution neural network, CNN) trained on climate variability indices can model the river runoff better than the long-term monthly mean baseline, both in univariate (per-cell) and multivariate (multi-cell, regionalized) settings. We compared the models to the baseline in the form of heatmaps and presented results of ablation experiments (test time ablation, i.e., jackknifing, and training time ablation), which suggested that ENSO is the primary determinant among the considered indices. Text North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation MDPI Open Access Publishing Pacific Water 13 9 1177
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic river runoff
climate variability
machine learning
spellingShingle river runoff
climate variability
machine learning
Mateusz Norel
Krzysztof Krawiec
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz
Machine Learning Modeling of Climate Variability Impact on River Runoff
topic_facet river runoff
climate variability
machine learning
description The hypothesis of this study was one of existence of spatially organized links between the time series of river runoff and climate variability indices, describing the oscillations in the atmosphere–ocean system: ENSO (El Niño–Southern Oscillation), PDO (Pacific Decadal Oscillation), AMO (Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation), and NAO (North Atlantic Oscillation). The global river flow reconstructions (ERA-20-CM-R) for 18 study areas on six continents and climate variability indices for the period 1901–2010 were used. The split-sample approach was applied, with the period 1901–2000 used for training and 2001–2010 used for testing. The quality measures used in this paper were mean absolute error, dynamic time warping, and top extreme events error. We demonstrated that a machine learning approach (convolution neural network, CNN) trained on climate variability indices can model the river runoff better than the long-term monthly mean baseline, both in univariate (per-cell) and multivariate (multi-cell, regionalized) settings. We compared the models to the baseline in the form of heatmaps and presented results of ablation experiments (test time ablation, i.e., jackknifing, and training time ablation), which suggested that ENSO is the primary determinant among the considered indices.
format Text
author Mateusz Norel
Krzysztof Krawiec
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz
author_facet Mateusz Norel
Krzysztof Krawiec
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz
author_sort Mateusz Norel
title Machine Learning Modeling of Climate Variability Impact on River Runoff
title_short Machine Learning Modeling of Climate Variability Impact on River Runoff
title_full Machine Learning Modeling of Climate Variability Impact on River Runoff
title_fullStr Machine Learning Modeling of Climate Variability Impact on River Runoff
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Modeling of Climate Variability Impact on River Runoff
title_sort machine learning modeling of climate variability impact on river runoff
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091177
op_coverage agris
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
genre_facet North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
op_source Water; Volume 13; Issue 9; Pages: 1177
op_relation Hydrology
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w13091177
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091177
container_title Water
container_volume 13
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1177
_version_ 1774720614925336576