Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools for Assessing Biogas Plants: A Case Study in Reykjavik, Iceland

The European Union is planning a new program to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. In this context, the Icelandic government plans to ban new registrations of fossil fuel cars after 2030 as one of the strategies to make Iceland a carbon-neutral country by 2040. Upgraded biogas can be directly used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water
Main Authors: Tamara Llano, Elena Dosal, Johannes Lindorfer, David C. Finger
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162150
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4441/13/16/2150/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4441/13/16/2150/ 2023-08-20T04:07:24+02:00 Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools for Assessing Biogas Plants: A Case Study in Reykjavik, Iceland Tamara Llano Elena Dosal Johannes Lindorfer David C. Finger agris 2021-08-05 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162150 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Urban Water Management https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w13162150 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Water; Volume 13; Issue 16; Pages: 2150 biogas biomethane multi-criteria analysis municipal solid waste food waste lignocellulosic biomass weighted summation Text 2021 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162150 2023-08-01T02:22:04Z The European Union is planning a new program to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. In this context, the Icelandic government plans to ban new registrations of fossil fuel cars after 2030 as one of the strategies to make Iceland a carbon-neutral country by 2040. Upgraded biogas can be directly used in vehicles with CNG engines, reducing CO2 emissions by 80%. In this paper, several alternatives of biogas plants, simulated in previous research, were evaluated by considering techno-economic and environmental criteria through the application of multi-criteria decision-making tools. Twelve alternatives were analyzed using the Definite 3.1 software. A weighted summation algorithm, which transforms all criteria into the same scale by multiplying them by weights and then summing them to obtain the results, was used in the analysis. The multi-criteria analysis of the twelve proposed alternatives included eleven criteria (three technical, five economic, and three environmental) whose weights were changed in a total of eleven scenarios. From a global perspective, when all criteria were considered (9.1% weight) the best alternative with a score of 0.58 was the single-stage biogas plant working with municipal solid waste. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses also demonstrated that the multi-criteria results obtained were robust and reliable. Text Iceland MDPI Open Access Publishing Water 13 16 2150
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic biogas
biomethane
multi-criteria analysis
municipal solid waste
food waste
lignocellulosic biomass
weighted summation
spellingShingle biogas
biomethane
multi-criteria analysis
municipal solid waste
food waste
lignocellulosic biomass
weighted summation
Tamara Llano
Elena Dosal
Johannes Lindorfer
David C. Finger
Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools for Assessing Biogas Plants: A Case Study in Reykjavik, Iceland
topic_facet biogas
biomethane
multi-criteria analysis
municipal solid waste
food waste
lignocellulosic biomass
weighted summation
description The European Union is planning a new program to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. In this context, the Icelandic government plans to ban new registrations of fossil fuel cars after 2030 as one of the strategies to make Iceland a carbon-neutral country by 2040. Upgraded biogas can be directly used in vehicles with CNG engines, reducing CO2 emissions by 80%. In this paper, several alternatives of biogas plants, simulated in previous research, were evaluated by considering techno-economic and environmental criteria through the application of multi-criteria decision-making tools. Twelve alternatives were analyzed using the Definite 3.1 software. A weighted summation algorithm, which transforms all criteria into the same scale by multiplying them by weights and then summing them to obtain the results, was used in the analysis. The multi-criteria analysis of the twelve proposed alternatives included eleven criteria (three technical, five economic, and three environmental) whose weights were changed in a total of eleven scenarios. From a global perspective, when all criteria were considered (9.1% weight) the best alternative with a score of 0.58 was the single-stage biogas plant working with municipal solid waste. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses also demonstrated that the multi-criteria results obtained were robust and reliable.
format Text
author Tamara Llano
Elena Dosal
Johannes Lindorfer
David C. Finger
author_facet Tamara Llano
Elena Dosal
Johannes Lindorfer
David C. Finger
author_sort Tamara Llano
title Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools for Assessing Biogas Plants: A Case Study in Reykjavik, Iceland
title_short Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools for Assessing Biogas Plants: A Case Study in Reykjavik, Iceland
title_full Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools for Assessing Biogas Plants: A Case Study in Reykjavik, Iceland
title_fullStr Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools for Assessing Biogas Plants: A Case Study in Reykjavik, Iceland
title_full_unstemmed Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools for Assessing Biogas Plants: A Case Study in Reykjavik, Iceland
title_sort application of multi-criteria decision-making tools for assessing biogas plants: a case study in reykjavik, iceland
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162150
op_coverage agris
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Water; Volume 13; Issue 16; Pages: 2150
op_relation Urban Water Management
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w13162150
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162150
container_title Water
container_volume 13
container_issue 16
container_start_page 2150
_version_ 1774719010780217344