Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism

While international instruments and a few state governments endorse the “free, prior and informed consent” of Indigenous peoples in decision-making about the water in their traditional territories, most state water governance regimes do not recognize Indigenous water rights and responsibilities. App...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water
Main Author: Deborah Curran
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019
Subjects:
law
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4441/11/3/571/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4441/11/3/571/ 2023-08-20T04:06:33+02:00 Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism Deborah Curran agris 2019-03-19 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Water Resources Management, Policy and Governance https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w11030571 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Water; Volume 11; Issue 3; Pages: 571 water governance politics law decision-making processes governmentalities UNDRIP free prior and informed consent FPIC groundwater environmental flows environmental assessment Text 2019 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571 2023-07-31T22:07:41Z While international instruments and a few state governments endorse the “free, prior and informed consent” of Indigenous peoples in decision-making about the water in their traditional territories, most state water governance regimes do not recognize Indigenous water rights and responsibilities. Applying a political ecology lens to the settler colonialism of water governance exposes the continued depoliticizing personality of natural resources decision-making and reveals water as an abstract, static resource in law and governance processes. Most plainly, these decision-making processes inadequately consider environmental flows or cumulative effects and are at odds with both Indigenous governance and social-ecological approaches to watershed management. Using the example of groundwater licensing in British Columbia, Canada as reinforcing colonialism in water governance, this article examines how First Nations are asserting Indigenous rights in response to natural resource decision-making. Both within and outside of colonial governance processes they are establishing administrative and governance structures that express their water laws and jurisdiction. These structures include the Syilx, Nadleh Wut’en and Stellat’en creating standards for water, the Tsleil-Waututh and Stk’emlúpsemc te Secwépemc community assessments of proposed pipeline and mining facilities, and the First Nations of the Nicola Valley planning process based on their own legal traditions. Where provincial and federal environmental governance has failed, Indigenous communities are repoliticizing colonial decision-making processes to shift jurisdiction towards Indigenous processes that institutionalize responsibilities for and relationships with water. Text First Nations MDPI Open Access Publishing British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Canada Water 11 3 571
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic water governance
politics
law
decision-making processes
governmentalities
UNDRIP
free
prior and informed consent
FPIC
groundwater
environmental flows
environmental assessment
spellingShingle water governance
politics
law
decision-making processes
governmentalities
UNDRIP
free
prior and informed consent
FPIC
groundwater
environmental flows
environmental assessment
Deborah Curran
Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
topic_facet water governance
politics
law
decision-making processes
governmentalities
UNDRIP
free
prior and informed consent
FPIC
groundwater
environmental flows
environmental assessment
description While international instruments and a few state governments endorse the “free, prior and informed consent” of Indigenous peoples in decision-making about the water in their traditional territories, most state water governance regimes do not recognize Indigenous water rights and responsibilities. Applying a political ecology lens to the settler colonialism of water governance exposes the continued depoliticizing personality of natural resources decision-making and reveals water as an abstract, static resource in law and governance processes. Most plainly, these decision-making processes inadequately consider environmental flows or cumulative effects and are at odds with both Indigenous governance and social-ecological approaches to watershed management. Using the example of groundwater licensing in British Columbia, Canada as reinforcing colonialism in water governance, this article examines how First Nations are asserting Indigenous rights in response to natural resource decision-making. Both within and outside of colonial governance processes they are establishing administrative and governance structures that express their water laws and jurisdiction. These structures include the Syilx, Nadleh Wut’en and Stellat’en creating standards for water, the Tsleil-Waututh and Stk’emlúpsemc te Secwépemc community assessments of proposed pipeline and mining facilities, and the First Nations of the Nicola Valley planning process based on their own legal traditions. Where provincial and federal environmental governance has failed, Indigenous communities are repoliticizing colonial decision-making processes to shift jurisdiction towards Indigenous processes that institutionalize responsibilities for and relationships with water.
format Text
author Deborah Curran
author_facet Deborah Curran
author_sort Deborah Curran
title Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_short Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_full Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_fullStr Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_sort indigenous processes of consent: repoliticizing water governance through legal pluralism
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
op_coverage agris
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic British Columbia
Canada
geographic_facet British Columbia
Canada
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Water; Volume 11; Issue 3; Pages: 571
op_relation Water Resources Management, Policy and Governance
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
container_title Water
container_volume 11
container_issue 3
container_start_page 571
_version_ 1774717696382861312