The Impacts of Smoke Emitted from Boreal Forest Wildfires on the High Latitude Radiative Energy Budget—A Case Study of the 2002 Yakutsk Wildfires

We examine the 2002 Yakutsk wildfire event and simulate the impacts of smoke aerosols on local radiative energy budget, using the WRF-Chem-SMOKE model. When comparing satellite retrievals (the Surface Radiation Budget (SRB) dataset) with model simulations, we found that the agreement is generally go...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmosphere
Main Authors: Zheng Lu, Irina N. Sokolik
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100410
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/9/10/410/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/9/10/410/ 2023-08-20T04:10:21+02:00 The Impacts of Smoke Emitted from Boreal Forest Wildfires on the High Latitude Radiative Energy Budget—A Case Study of the 2002 Yakutsk Wildfires Zheng Lu Irina N. Sokolik agris 2018-10-19 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100410 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Meteorology https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100410 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Atmosphere; Volume 9; Issue 10; Pages: 410 biomass burning aerosols clouds modeling Text 2018 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100410 2023-07-31T21:47:23Z We examine the 2002 Yakutsk wildfire event and simulate the impacts of smoke aerosols on local radiative energy budget, using the WRF-Chem-SMOKE model. When comparing satellite retrievals (the Surface Radiation Budget (SRB) dataset) with model simulations, we found that the agreement is generally good, except for the regions where the model predicts too few clouds or SRB misclassifies strong smoke plumes as clouds. We also found that the smoke-induced changes in upward shortwave fluxes at top of atmosphere (TOA) vary under different burning and meteorological conditions. In the first period of the fire season (9–12 August), smoke particles cause a warming effect around 3 W/m2, mainly through functioning as ice nuclei, which deplete the cloud water amount in the frontal system. At the beginning of the second period of the fire season (19–20 August), large amounts of pre-existing smoke particles cause a strong cooling effect of −8 W/m2. This is offset by the warming effect caused by relatively small amounts of cloud condensation nuclei increases, which promotes the rain formation and depletes the cloud water amount. After the cloud decks are well mixed with smoke plumes (21–22 August), the first indirect and direct effects of smoke together lead to a cooling of −10 W/m2. These results highlight the importance of meso-scale modeling efforts in estimating the smoke-induced changes in the radiative energy budget over high latitudes. Text Yakutsk MDPI Open Access Publishing Yakutsk Atmosphere 9 10 410
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic biomass burning aerosols
clouds
modeling
spellingShingle biomass burning aerosols
clouds
modeling
Zheng Lu
Irina N. Sokolik
The Impacts of Smoke Emitted from Boreal Forest Wildfires on the High Latitude Radiative Energy Budget—A Case Study of the 2002 Yakutsk Wildfires
topic_facet biomass burning aerosols
clouds
modeling
description We examine the 2002 Yakutsk wildfire event and simulate the impacts of smoke aerosols on local radiative energy budget, using the WRF-Chem-SMOKE model. When comparing satellite retrievals (the Surface Radiation Budget (SRB) dataset) with model simulations, we found that the agreement is generally good, except for the regions where the model predicts too few clouds or SRB misclassifies strong smoke plumes as clouds. We also found that the smoke-induced changes in upward shortwave fluxes at top of atmosphere (TOA) vary under different burning and meteorological conditions. In the first period of the fire season (9–12 August), smoke particles cause a warming effect around 3 W/m2, mainly through functioning as ice nuclei, which deplete the cloud water amount in the frontal system. At the beginning of the second period of the fire season (19–20 August), large amounts of pre-existing smoke particles cause a strong cooling effect of −8 W/m2. This is offset by the warming effect caused by relatively small amounts of cloud condensation nuclei increases, which promotes the rain formation and depletes the cloud water amount. After the cloud decks are well mixed with smoke plumes (21–22 August), the first indirect and direct effects of smoke together lead to a cooling of −10 W/m2. These results highlight the importance of meso-scale modeling efforts in estimating the smoke-induced changes in the radiative energy budget over high latitudes.
format Text
author Zheng Lu
Irina N. Sokolik
author_facet Zheng Lu
Irina N. Sokolik
author_sort Zheng Lu
title The Impacts of Smoke Emitted from Boreal Forest Wildfires on the High Latitude Radiative Energy Budget—A Case Study of the 2002 Yakutsk Wildfires
title_short The Impacts of Smoke Emitted from Boreal Forest Wildfires on the High Latitude Radiative Energy Budget—A Case Study of the 2002 Yakutsk Wildfires
title_full The Impacts of Smoke Emitted from Boreal Forest Wildfires on the High Latitude Radiative Energy Budget—A Case Study of the 2002 Yakutsk Wildfires
title_fullStr The Impacts of Smoke Emitted from Boreal Forest Wildfires on the High Latitude Radiative Energy Budget—A Case Study of the 2002 Yakutsk Wildfires
title_full_unstemmed The Impacts of Smoke Emitted from Boreal Forest Wildfires on the High Latitude Radiative Energy Budget—A Case Study of the 2002 Yakutsk Wildfires
title_sort impacts of smoke emitted from boreal forest wildfires on the high latitude radiative energy budget—a case study of the 2002 yakutsk wildfires
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100410
op_coverage agris
geographic Yakutsk
geographic_facet Yakutsk
genre Yakutsk
genre_facet Yakutsk
op_source Atmosphere; Volume 9; Issue 10; Pages: 410
op_relation Meteorology
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100410
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100410
container_title Atmosphere
container_volume 9
container_issue 10
container_start_page 410
_version_ 1774724466861932544