Merging MODIS and Ground-Based Fine Mode Fraction of Aerosols Based on the Geostatistical Data Fusion Method

With the rapid development of the economy and society, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has not only caused severe environmental problems, but also posed a threat to public health. In order to improve the estimated accuracy of PM2.5, the input data fine mode fraction (FMF), a key parameter to the PM2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmosphere
Main Authors: Aimei Zhao, Zhengqiang Li, Ying Zhang, Yang Zhang, Donghui Li
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2017
Subjects:
FMF
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8070117
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/8/7/117/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/8/7/117/ 2023-08-20T03:59:11+02:00 Merging MODIS and Ground-Based Fine Mode Fraction of Aerosols Based on the Geostatistical Data Fusion Method Aimei Zhao Zhengqiang Li Ying Zhang Yang Zhang Donghui Li agris 2017-07-03 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8070117 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Aerosols https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos8070117 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Atmosphere; Volume 8; Issue 7; Pages: 117 FMF UK fusion PM 2.5 PMRS MODIS Text 2017 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8070117 2023-07-31T21:09:29Z With the rapid development of the economy and society, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has not only caused severe environmental problems, but also posed a threat to public health. In order to improve the estimated accuracy of PM2.5, the input data fine mode fraction (FMF), a key parameter to the PM2.5 remote sensing method (PMRS), should be improved due to its significant errors. In this study, we merge the observations of the fine mode fraction (FMF) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) and the Sun-sky radiometer Observation Network (SONET) using the universal kriging (UK) method to obtain accurate FMF distribution over eastern China. PM2.5 mass concentration is estimated by the fusion and MODIS FMF distributions using the PMRS model. The results show that the parameters in the variogram are relatively stable except for significant differences in correlation lengths in summer. The FMF in the Winter of 2015 shows that the mean error decreases from 0.38 to 0.13 compared with that from MODIS using leave-one-out cross-validation, with the maximum error decreasing from 0.75 to 0.34, indicating that the UK method can provide better estimates of FMF. We also find that PM2.5 estimated from FMF fusion results is closer to the in situ PM2.5 from the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) (87.2 vs. 88.9 μg/m3). Text Aerosol Robotic Network MDPI Open Access Publishing Atmosphere 8 7 117
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic FMF
UK fusion
PM 2.5
PMRS
MODIS
spellingShingle FMF
UK fusion
PM 2.5
PMRS
MODIS
Aimei Zhao
Zhengqiang Li
Ying Zhang
Yang Zhang
Donghui Li
Merging MODIS and Ground-Based Fine Mode Fraction of Aerosols Based on the Geostatistical Data Fusion Method
topic_facet FMF
UK fusion
PM 2.5
PMRS
MODIS
description With the rapid development of the economy and society, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has not only caused severe environmental problems, but also posed a threat to public health. In order to improve the estimated accuracy of PM2.5, the input data fine mode fraction (FMF), a key parameter to the PM2.5 remote sensing method (PMRS), should be improved due to its significant errors. In this study, we merge the observations of the fine mode fraction (FMF) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) and the Sun-sky radiometer Observation Network (SONET) using the universal kriging (UK) method to obtain accurate FMF distribution over eastern China. PM2.5 mass concentration is estimated by the fusion and MODIS FMF distributions using the PMRS model. The results show that the parameters in the variogram are relatively stable except for significant differences in correlation lengths in summer. The FMF in the Winter of 2015 shows that the mean error decreases from 0.38 to 0.13 compared with that from MODIS using leave-one-out cross-validation, with the maximum error decreasing from 0.75 to 0.34, indicating that the UK method can provide better estimates of FMF. We also find that PM2.5 estimated from FMF fusion results is closer to the in situ PM2.5 from the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) (87.2 vs. 88.9 μg/m3).
format Text
author Aimei Zhao
Zhengqiang Li
Ying Zhang
Yang Zhang
Donghui Li
author_facet Aimei Zhao
Zhengqiang Li
Ying Zhang
Yang Zhang
Donghui Li
author_sort Aimei Zhao
title Merging MODIS and Ground-Based Fine Mode Fraction of Aerosols Based on the Geostatistical Data Fusion Method
title_short Merging MODIS and Ground-Based Fine Mode Fraction of Aerosols Based on the Geostatistical Data Fusion Method
title_full Merging MODIS and Ground-Based Fine Mode Fraction of Aerosols Based on the Geostatistical Data Fusion Method
title_fullStr Merging MODIS and Ground-Based Fine Mode Fraction of Aerosols Based on the Geostatistical Data Fusion Method
title_full_unstemmed Merging MODIS and Ground-Based Fine Mode Fraction of Aerosols Based on the Geostatistical Data Fusion Method
title_sort merging modis and ground-based fine mode fraction of aerosols based on the geostatistical data fusion method
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8070117
op_coverage agris
genre Aerosol Robotic Network
genre_facet Aerosol Robotic Network
op_source Atmosphere; Volume 8; Issue 7; Pages: 117
op_relation Aerosols
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos8070117
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8070117
container_title Atmosphere
container_volume 8
container_issue 7
container_start_page 117
_version_ 1774719217106419712