The Importance of Lateral Boundaries, Surface Forcing and Choice of Domain Size for Dynamical Downscaling of Global Climate Simulations

Dynamical downscaling by atmospheric Regional Climate Models (RCMs) forced with low-resolution data should produce climate details and add quality and value to the low-resolution data. The aim of this study was to explore the importance of (i) the oceanic surface forcing (sea-surface temperature (SS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmosphere
Main Authors: Morten A.Ø. Køltzow, Trond Iversen, Jan Erik Haugen
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Molecular Diversity Preservation International 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2020067
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/2/2/67/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/2/2/67/ 2023-08-20T04:09:45+02:00 The Importance of Lateral Boundaries, Surface Forcing and Choice of Domain Size for Dynamical Downscaling of Global Climate Simulations Morten A.Ø. Køltzow Trond Iversen Jan Erik Haugen agris 2011-05-11 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2020067 EN eng Molecular Diversity Preservation International Climatology https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos2020067 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Atmosphere; Volume 2; Issue 2; Pages: 67-95 dynamical downscaling lateral- and surface forcing domain size Text 2011 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2020067 2023-07-31T20:26:31Z Dynamical downscaling by atmospheric Regional Climate Models (RCMs) forced with low-resolution data should produce climate details and add quality and value to the low-resolution data. The aim of this study was to explore the importance of (i) the oceanic surface forcing (sea-surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice), (ii) the lateral boundary condition data, and (iii) the size of the integration domain with respect to improved quality and value in dynamically downscaled data. Experiments addressing the three aspects were performed and the results were investigated for mean sea level pressure (mslp), 2 m air temperature (T2m) and daily precipitation. Although changes in SST gave a clear response locally, changes in the lateral boundary data and the size of the integration domain turned out to be more important with our geographical scope being Norway. The T2m turned out less sensitive to the changes in lateral forcing and the size of the integration domain than mslp and precipitation. The sensitivity for all three variables differed between Norwegian regions; northern parts of Norway were the most sensitive. Even though the sensitivities found in this study might be different in other regions and for other RCMs, these results call for careful consideration when choosing integration domain and driving lateral boundary data when performing dynamical downscaling. Text Sea ice MDPI Open Access Publishing Norway Atmosphere 2 2 67 95
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic dynamical downscaling
lateral- and surface forcing
domain size
spellingShingle dynamical downscaling
lateral- and surface forcing
domain size
Morten A.Ø. Køltzow
Trond Iversen
Jan Erik Haugen
The Importance of Lateral Boundaries, Surface Forcing and Choice of Domain Size for Dynamical Downscaling of Global Climate Simulations
topic_facet dynamical downscaling
lateral- and surface forcing
domain size
description Dynamical downscaling by atmospheric Regional Climate Models (RCMs) forced with low-resolution data should produce climate details and add quality and value to the low-resolution data. The aim of this study was to explore the importance of (i) the oceanic surface forcing (sea-surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice), (ii) the lateral boundary condition data, and (iii) the size of the integration domain with respect to improved quality and value in dynamically downscaled data. Experiments addressing the three aspects were performed and the results were investigated for mean sea level pressure (mslp), 2 m air temperature (T2m) and daily precipitation. Although changes in SST gave a clear response locally, changes in the lateral boundary data and the size of the integration domain turned out to be more important with our geographical scope being Norway. The T2m turned out less sensitive to the changes in lateral forcing and the size of the integration domain than mslp and precipitation. The sensitivity for all three variables differed between Norwegian regions; northern parts of Norway were the most sensitive. Even though the sensitivities found in this study might be different in other regions and for other RCMs, these results call for careful consideration when choosing integration domain and driving lateral boundary data when performing dynamical downscaling.
format Text
author Morten A.Ø. Køltzow
Trond Iversen
Jan Erik Haugen
author_facet Morten A.Ø. Køltzow
Trond Iversen
Jan Erik Haugen
author_sort Morten A.Ø. Køltzow
title The Importance of Lateral Boundaries, Surface Forcing and Choice of Domain Size for Dynamical Downscaling of Global Climate Simulations
title_short The Importance of Lateral Boundaries, Surface Forcing and Choice of Domain Size for Dynamical Downscaling of Global Climate Simulations
title_full The Importance of Lateral Boundaries, Surface Forcing and Choice of Domain Size for Dynamical Downscaling of Global Climate Simulations
title_fullStr The Importance of Lateral Boundaries, Surface Forcing and Choice of Domain Size for Dynamical Downscaling of Global Climate Simulations
title_full_unstemmed The Importance of Lateral Boundaries, Surface Forcing and Choice of Domain Size for Dynamical Downscaling of Global Climate Simulations
title_sort importance of lateral boundaries, surface forcing and choice of domain size for dynamical downscaling of global climate simulations
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International
publishDate 2011
url https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2020067
op_coverage agris
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Sea ice
genre_facet Sea ice
op_source Atmosphere; Volume 2; Issue 2; Pages: 67-95
op_relation Climatology
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos2020067
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2020067
container_title Atmosphere
container_volume 2
container_issue 2
container_start_page 67
op_container_end_page 95
_version_ 1774723419094384640