Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)

We compare the Arctic amplification (AA) produced by the two Community Earth System Models CESM1 and CESM2, members of the CEMIP5 (Coupled Models Intercomparison Project phase 5) and CEMIP6 collections, respectively. We find that the CESM1 model reproduces the recent high values of the AA deduced fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmosphere
Main Authors: Petr Chylek, Chris Folland, James D. Klett, Glen Lesins, Manvendra K. Dubey
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820
_version_ 1821810489820184576
author Petr Chylek
Chris Folland
James D. Klett
Glen Lesins
Manvendra K. Dubey
author_facet Petr Chylek
Chris Folland
James D. Klett
Glen Lesins
Manvendra K. Dubey
author_sort Petr Chylek
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 5
container_start_page 820
container_title Atmosphere
container_volume 14
description We compare the Arctic amplification (AA) produced by the two Community Earth System Models CESM1 and CESM2, members of the CEMIP5 (Coupled Models Intercomparison Project phase 5) and CEMIP6 collections, respectively. We find that the CESM1 model reproduces the recent high values of the AA deduced from the observed temperature much better than the CESM2. The correlation coefficient within the 1970–2012 time period between CESM1-simulated AA and the observed one is 0.47, while the CESM2 simulation leads to an anticorrelation of r = −0.53. Even the more successful model (CESM1) is not able to reproduce recent high AA values of 4–5. The main cause of this failure is the model’s overestimate of the rate of increase in the mean global temperature in years post 1990. When the CESM1 model’s simulated trend of the mean global temperature is replaced in the expression for the AA by the observed temperature trend, the correlation coefficient increases from 0.47 to 0.75. The CESM1 model is among the best north American models in AA simulation while the CESM2 model is among the least successful.
format Text
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/14/5/820/
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_coverage agris
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820
op_relation Climatology
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_source Atmosphere; Volume 14; Issue 5; Pages: 820
publishDate 2023
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/14/5/820/ 2025-01-16T20:16:10+00:00 Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2) Petr Chylek Chris Folland James D. Klett Glen Lesins Manvendra K. Dubey agris 2023-05-02 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Climatology https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Atmosphere; Volume 14; Issue 5; Pages: 820 Arctic amplification Arctic climate climate models CESM1 and CESM2 Text 2023 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 2023-08-01T09:55:44Z We compare the Arctic amplification (AA) produced by the two Community Earth System Models CESM1 and CESM2, members of the CEMIP5 (Coupled Models Intercomparison Project phase 5) and CEMIP6 collections, respectively. We find that the CESM1 model reproduces the recent high values of the AA deduced from the observed temperature much better than the CESM2. The correlation coefficient within the 1970–2012 time period between CESM1-simulated AA and the observed one is 0.47, while the CESM2 simulation leads to an anticorrelation of r = −0.53. Even the more successful model (CESM1) is not able to reproduce recent high AA values of 4–5. The main cause of this failure is the model’s overestimate of the rate of increase in the mean global temperature in years post 1990. When the CESM1 model’s simulated trend of the mean global temperature is replaced in the expression for the AA by the observed temperature trend, the correlation coefficient increases from 0.47 to 0.75. The CESM1 model is among the best north American models in AA simulation while the CESM2 model is among the least successful. Text Arctic MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Atmosphere 14 5 820
spellingShingle Arctic amplification
Arctic climate
climate models
CESM1 and CESM2
Petr Chylek
Chris Folland
James D. Klett
Glen Lesins
Manvendra K. Dubey
Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title_full Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title_fullStr Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title_full_unstemmed Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title_short Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title_sort arctic amplification in the community earth system models (cesm1 and cesm2)
topic Arctic amplification
Arctic climate
climate models
CESM1 and CESM2
topic_facet Arctic amplification
Arctic climate
climate models
CESM1 and CESM2
url https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820