Sensitivity of Volcanic Ash Dispersion Modelling to Input Grain Size Distribution Based on Hydromagmatic and Magmatic Deposits

The size distribution of volcanic ash is rarely measured in real time and Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres (VAACs) often rely on a default particle size distribution (PSD) to initialise their dispersion models when forecasting the movement of ash clouds. We conducted a sensitivity study to investigate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmosphere
Main Authors: Sara Osman, Frances Beckett, Alison Rust, Eveanjelene Snee
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060567
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/11/6/567/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2073-4433/11/6/567/ 2023-08-20T04:06:21+02:00 Sensitivity of Volcanic Ash Dispersion Modelling to Input Grain Size Distribution Based on Hydromagmatic and Magmatic Deposits Sara Osman Frances Beckett Alison Rust Eveanjelene Snee agris 2020-05-29 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060567 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Air Quality https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060567 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Atmosphere; Volume 11; Issue 6; Pages: 567 volcanic ash particle size distributions total grain size distributions dispersion modelling Text 2020 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060567 2023-07-31T23:33:56Z The size distribution of volcanic ash is rarely measured in real time and Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres (VAACs) often rely on a default particle size distribution (PSD) to initialise their dispersion models when forecasting the movement of ash clouds. We conducted a sensitivity study to investigate the impact of PSD on model output and consider how best to apply default PSDs in operational dispersion modelling. Compiled grain size data confirm that, when considering particles likely to be in the distal ash cloud (< 125 µm diameter), magma composition and eruption size are the dominant controls on grain size distribution. Constraining the PSD is challenging but we find that the grain size of deposits from large hydromagmatic eruptions remains relatively constant with distance, suggesting that total (whole-deposit) grain size distributions (TGSDs) for these eruptions could be estimated from a few samples. We investigated the sensitivity of modelled ash mass loadings (in the air and on the ground) to input PSDs based on coarse to fine TGSDs from our dataset. We found clear differences between modelled mass loadings and the extent of the plume. Comparing TGSDs based on ground-only and ground-plus-satellite data for the Eyjafjallajökull 2010 eruption, we found that basing input PSDs on TGSDs from deposits alone (likely missing the finest particles) led to lower modelled peak ash concentrations and a smaller plume. Text Eyjafjallajökull MDPI Open Access Publishing Atmosphere 11 6 567
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic volcanic ash
particle size distributions
total grain size distributions
dispersion modelling
spellingShingle volcanic ash
particle size distributions
total grain size distributions
dispersion modelling
Sara Osman
Frances Beckett
Alison Rust
Eveanjelene Snee
Sensitivity of Volcanic Ash Dispersion Modelling to Input Grain Size Distribution Based on Hydromagmatic and Magmatic Deposits
topic_facet volcanic ash
particle size distributions
total grain size distributions
dispersion modelling
description The size distribution of volcanic ash is rarely measured in real time and Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres (VAACs) often rely on a default particle size distribution (PSD) to initialise their dispersion models when forecasting the movement of ash clouds. We conducted a sensitivity study to investigate the impact of PSD on model output and consider how best to apply default PSDs in operational dispersion modelling. Compiled grain size data confirm that, when considering particles likely to be in the distal ash cloud (< 125 µm diameter), magma composition and eruption size are the dominant controls on grain size distribution. Constraining the PSD is challenging but we find that the grain size of deposits from large hydromagmatic eruptions remains relatively constant with distance, suggesting that total (whole-deposit) grain size distributions (TGSDs) for these eruptions could be estimated from a few samples. We investigated the sensitivity of modelled ash mass loadings (in the air and on the ground) to input PSDs based on coarse to fine TGSDs from our dataset. We found clear differences between modelled mass loadings and the extent of the plume. Comparing TGSDs based on ground-only and ground-plus-satellite data for the Eyjafjallajökull 2010 eruption, we found that basing input PSDs on TGSDs from deposits alone (likely missing the finest particles) led to lower modelled peak ash concentrations and a smaller plume.
format Text
author Sara Osman
Frances Beckett
Alison Rust
Eveanjelene Snee
author_facet Sara Osman
Frances Beckett
Alison Rust
Eveanjelene Snee
author_sort Sara Osman
title Sensitivity of Volcanic Ash Dispersion Modelling to Input Grain Size Distribution Based on Hydromagmatic and Magmatic Deposits
title_short Sensitivity of Volcanic Ash Dispersion Modelling to Input Grain Size Distribution Based on Hydromagmatic and Magmatic Deposits
title_full Sensitivity of Volcanic Ash Dispersion Modelling to Input Grain Size Distribution Based on Hydromagmatic and Magmatic Deposits
title_fullStr Sensitivity of Volcanic Ash Dispersion Modelling to Input Grain Size Distribution Based on Hydromagmatic and Magmatic Deposits
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of Volcanic Ash Dispersion Modelling to Input Grain Size Distribution Based on Hydromagmatic and Magmatic Deposits
title_sort sensitivity of volcanic ash dispersion modelling to input grain size distribution based on hydromagmatic and magmatic deposits
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060567
op_coverage agris
genre Eyjafjallajökull
genre_facet Eyjafjallajökull
op_source Atmosphere; Volume 11; Issue 6; Pages: 567
op_relation Air Quality
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060567
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060567
container_title Atmosphere
container_volume 11
container_issue 6
container_start_page 567
_version_ 1774717372343517184