Spectral Reflectance of Polar Bear and Other Large Arctic Mammal Pelts; Potential Applications to Remote Sensing Surveys

Spectral reflectance within the 350–2500 nm range was measured for 17 pelts of arctic mammals (polar bear, caribou, muskox, and ringed, harp and bearded seals) in relation to snow. Reflectance of all pelts was very low at the ultraviolet (UV) end of the spectrum (<10%), increased through the visu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: George Leblanc, Charles Francis, Raymond Soffer, Margaret Kalacska, Julie De Gea
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040273
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/8/4/273/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/8/4/273/ 2023-08-20T04:04:20+02:00 Spectral Reflectance of Polar Bear and Other Large Arctic Mammal Pelts; Potential Applications to Remote Sensing Surveys George Leblanc Charles Francis Raymond Soffer Margaret Kalacska Julie De Gea 2016-03-25 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040273 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs8040273 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 8; Issue 4; Pages: 273 polar bear seal spectral signature muskox caribou hyperspectral Text 2016 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040273 2023-07-31T20:51:35Z Spectral reflectance within the 350–2500 nm range was measured for 17 pelts of arctic mammals (polar bear, caribou, muskox, and ringed, harp and bearded seals) in relation to snow. Reflectance of all pelts was very low at the ultraviolet (UV) end of the spectrum (<10%), increased through the visual and near infrared, peaking at 40%–60% between 1100 and 1400 nm and then gradually dropped, though remaining above 20% until at least 1800 nm. In contrast, reflectance of snow was very high in the UV range (>90%), gradually dropped to near zero at 1500 nm, and then fluctuated between zero and 20% up to 2500 nm. All pelts could be distinguished from clean snow at many wavelengths. The polar bear pelts had higher and more uniform averaged reflectance from about 600–1100 nm than most other pelts, but discrimination was challenging due to variation in pelt color and intensity among individuals within each species. Results suggest promising approaches for using remote sensing tools with a broad spectral range to discriminate polar bears and other mammals from clean snow. Further data from live animals in their natural environment are needed to develop functions to discriminate among species of mammals and to determine whether other environmental elements may have similar reflectance. Text Arctic muskox polar bear MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Remote Sensing 8 4 273
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic polar bear
seal
spectral signature
muskox
caribou
hyperspectral
spellingShingle polar bear
seal
spectral signature
muskox
caribou
hyperspectral
George Leblanc
Charles Francis
Raymond Soffer
Margaret Kalacska
Julie De Gea
Spectral Reflectance of Polar Bear and Other Large Arctic Mammal Pelts; Potential Applications to Remote Sensing Surveys
topic_facet polar bear
seal
spectral signature
muskox
caribou
hyperspectral
description Spectral reflectance within the 350–2500 nm range was measured for 17 pelts of arctic mammals (polar bear, caribou, muskox, and ringed, harp and bearded seals) in relation to snow. Reflectance of all pelts was very low at the ultraviolet (UV) end of the spectrum (<10%), increased through the visual and near infrared, peaking at 40%–60% between 1100 and 1400 nm and then gradually dropped, though remaining above 20% until at least 1800 nm. In contrast, reflectance of snow was very high in the UV range (>90%), gradually dropped to near zero at 1500 nm, and then fluctuated between zero and 20% up to 2500 nm. All pelts could be distinguished from clean snow at many wavelengths. The polar bear pelts had higher and more uniform averaged reflectance from about 600–1100 nm than most other pelts, but discrimination was challenging due to variation in pelt color and intensity among individuals within each species. Results suggest promising approaches for using remote sensing tools with a broad spectral range to discriminate polar bears and other mammals from clean snow. Further data from live animals in their natural environment are needed to develop functions to discriminate among species of mammals and to determine whether other environmental elements may have similar reflectance.
format Text
author George Leblanc
Charles Francis
Raymond Soffer
Margaret Kalacska
Julie De Gea
author_facet George Leblanc
Charles Francis
Raymond Soffer
Margaret Kalacska
Julie De Gea
author_sort George Leblanc
title Spectral Reflectance of Polar Bear and Other Large Arctic Mammal Pelts; Potential Applications to Remote Sensing Surveys
title_short Spectral Reflectance of Polar Bear and Other Large Arctic Mammal Pelts; Potential Applications to Remote Sensing Surveys
title_full Spectral Reflectance of Polar Bear and Other Large Arctic Mammal Pelts; Potential Applications to Remote Sensing Surveys
title_fullStr Spectral Reflectance of Polar Bear and Other Large Arctic Mammal Pelts; Potential Applications to Remote Sensing Surveys
title_full_unstemmed Spectral Reflectance of Polar Bear and Other Large Arctic Mammal Pelts; Potential Applications to Remote Sensing Surveys
title_sort spectral reflectance of polar bear and other large arctic mammal pelts; potential applications to remote sensing surveys
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040273
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
muskox
polar bear
genre_facet Arctic
muskox
polar bear
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 8; Issue 4; Pages: 273
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs8040273
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040273
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 8
container_issue 4
container_start_page 273
_version_ 1774714729564995584