Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth’s Radiation Budget

Satellites always sample the Earth-atmosphere system in a finite temporal resolution. This study investigates the effect of sampling frequency on the satellite-derived Earth radiation budget, with the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) as an example. The output from NASA’s Goddard Earth Observi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Daniel Holdaway, Yuekui Yang
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020098
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/8/2/98/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/8/2/98/ 2023-08-20T04:04:44+02:00 Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth’s Radiation Budget Daniel Holdaway Yuekui Yang agris 2016-01-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020098 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs8020098 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 8; Issue 2; Pages: 98 radiation budget satellite sampling frequency DSCOVR EPIC time series Arctic climate change GEOS-5 Nature Run Text 2016 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020098 2023-07-31T20:49:56Z Satellites always sample the Earth-atmosphere system in a finite temporal resolution. This study investigates the effect of sampling frequency on the satellite-derived Earth radiation budget, with the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) as an example. The output from NASA’s Goddard Earth Observing System Version 5 (GEOS-5) Nature Run is used as the truth. The Nature Run is a high spatial and temporal resolution atmospheric simulation spanning a two-year period. The effect of temporal resolution on potential DSCOVR observations is assessed by sampling the full Nature Run data with 1-h to 24-h frequencies. The uncertainty associated with a given sampling frequency is measured by computing means over daily, monthly, seasonal and annual intervals and determining the spread across different possible starting points. The skill with which a particular sampling frequency captures the structure of the full time series is measured using correlations and normalized errors. Results show that higher sampling frequency gives more information and less uncertainty in the derived radiation budget. A sampling frequency coarser than every 4 h results in significant error. Correlations between true and sampled time series also decrease more rapidly for a sampling frequency less than 4 h. Text Arctic Climate change MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Remote Sensing 8 2 98
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic radiation budget
satellite sampling frequency
DSCOVR
EPIC
time series
Arctic
climate change
GEOS-5
Nature Run
spellingShingle radiation budget
satellite sampling frequency
DSCOVR
EPIC
time series
Arctic
climate change
GEOS-5
Nature Run
Daniel Holdaway
Yuekui Yang
Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth’s Radiation Budget
topic_facet radiation budget
satellite sampling frequency
DSCOVR
EPIC
time series
Arctic
climate change
GEOS-5
Nature Run
description Satellites always sample the Earth-atmosphere system in a finite temporal resolution. This study investigates the effect of sampling frequency on the satellite-derived Earth radiation budget, with the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) as an example. The output from NASA’s Goddard Earth Observing System Version 5 (GEOS-5) Nature Run is used as the truth. The Nature Run is a high spatial and temporal resolution atmospheric simulation spanning a two-year period. The effect of temporal resolution on potential DSCOVR observations is assessed by sampling the full Nature Run data with 1-h to 24-h frequencies. The uncertainty associated with a given sampling frequency is measured by computing means over daily, monthly, seasonal and annual intervals and determining the spread across different possible starting points. The skill with which a particular sampling frequency captures the structure of the full time series is measured using correlations and normalized errors. Results show that higher sampling frequency gives more information and less uncertainty in the derived radiation budget. A sampling frequency coarser than every 4 h results in significant error. Correlations between true and sampled time series also decrease more rapidly for a sampling frequency less than 4 h.
format Text
author Daniel Holdaway
Yuekui Yang
author_facet Daniel Holdaway
Yuekui Yang
author_sort Daniel Holdaway
title Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth’s Radiation Budget
title_short Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth’s Radiation Budget
title_full Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth’s Radiation Budget
title_fullStr Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth’s Radiation Budget
title_full_unstemmed Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth’s Radiation Budget
title_sort study of the effect of temporal sampling frequency on dscovr observations using the geos-5 nature run results (part i): earth’s radiation budget
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020098
op_coverage agris
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 8; Issue 2; Pages: 98
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs8020098
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020098
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 8
container_issue 2
container_start_page 98
_version_ 1774715105910456320