Comparing Two Methods of Surface Change Detection on an Evolving Thermokarst Using High-Temporal-Frequency Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Selawik River, Alaska

Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) allow large and complex landforms to be rapidly surveyed at previously unattainable point densities. Many change detection methods have been employed to make use of these rich data sets, including cloud to mesh (C2M) comparisons and Multiscale Model to Model Cloud Co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Theodore Barnhart, Benjamin Crosby
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5062813
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/5/6/2813/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/5/6/2813/ 2023-08-20T04:04:58+02:00 Comparing Two Methods of Surface Change Detection on an Evolving Thermokarst Using High-Temporal-Frequency Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Selawik River, Alaska Theodore Barnhart Benjamin Crosby agris 2013-05-31 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5062813 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs5062813 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 5; Issue 6; Pages: 2813-2837 terrestrial laser scanning topographic change detection error analysis thermokarst Arctic permafrost Text 2013 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5062813 2023-07-31T20:32:46Z Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) allow large and complex landforms to be rapidly surveyed at previously unattainable point densities. Many change detection methods have been employed to make use of these rich data sets, including cloud to mesh (C2M) comparisons and Multiscale Model to Model Cloud Comparison (M3C2). Rather than use simulated point cloud data, we utilized a 58 scan TLS survey data set of the Selawik retrogressive thaw slump (RTS) to compare C2M and M3C2. The Selawik RTS is a rapidly evolving permafrost degradation feature in northwest Alaska that presents challenging survey conditions and a unique opportunity to compare change detection methods in a difficult surveying environment. Additionally, this study considers several error analysis techniques, investigates the spatial variability of topographic change across the feature and explores visualization techniques that enable the analysis of this spatiotemporal data set. C2M reports a higher magnitude of topographic change over short periods of time (~12 h) and reports a lower magnitude of topographic change over long periods of time (~four weeks) when compared to M3C2. We found that M3C2 provides a better accounting of the sources of uncertainty in TLS change detection than C2M, because it considers the uncertainty due to surface roughness and scan registration. We also found that localized areas of the RTS do not always approximate the overall retreat of the feature and show considerable spatial variability during inclement weather; however, when averaged together, the spatial subsets approximate the retreat of the entire feature. New data visualization techniques are explored to leverage temporally and spatially continuous data sets. Spatially binning the data into vertical strips along the headwall reduced the spatial complexity of the data and revealed spatiotemporal patterns of change. Text Arctic permafrost Thermokarst Alaska MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Remote Sensing 5 6 2813 2837
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic terrestrial laser scanning
topographic change detection
error analysis
thermokarst
Arctic
permafrost
spellingShingle terrestrial laser scanning
topographic change detection
error analysis
thermokarst
Arctic
permafrost
Theodore Barnhart
Benjamin Crosby
Comparing Two Methods of Surface Change Detection on an Evolving Thermokarst Using High-Temporal-Frequency Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Selawik River, Alaska
topic_facet terrestrial laser scanning
topographic change detection
error analysis
thermokarst
Arctic
permafrost
description Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) allow large and complex landforms to be rapidly surveyed at previously unattainable point densities. Many change detection methods have been employed to make use of these rich data sets, including cloud to mesh (C2M) comparisons and Multiscale Model to Model Cloud Comparison (M3C2). Rather than use simulated point cloud data, we utilized a 58 scan TLS survey data set of the Selawik retrogressive thaw slump (RTS) to compare C2M and M3C2. The Selawik RTS is a rapidly evolving permafrost degradation feature in northwest Alaska that presents challenging survey conditions and a unique opportunity to compare change detection methods in a difficult surveying environment. Additionally, this study considers several error analysis techniques, investigates the spatial variability of topographic change across the feature and explores visualization techniques that enable the analysis of this spatiotemporal data set. C2M reports a higher magnitude of topographic change over short periods of time (~12 h) and reports a lower magnitude of topographic change over long periods of time (~four weeks) when compared to M3C2. We found that M3C2 provides a better accounting of the sources of uncertainty in TLS change detection than C2M, because it considers the uncertainty due to surface roughness and scan registration. We also found that localized areas of the RTS do not always approximate the overall retreat of the feature and show considerable spatial variability during inclement weather; however, when averaged together, the spatial subsets approximate the retreat of the entire feature. New data visualization techniques are explored to leverage temporally and spatially continuous data sets. Spatially binning the data into vertical strips along the headwall reduced the spatial complexity of the data and revealed spatiotemporal patterns of change.
format Text
author Theodore Barnhart
Benjamin Crosby
author_facet Theodore Barnhart
Benjamin Crosby
author_sort Theodore Barnhart
title Comparing Two Methods of Surface Change Detection on an Evolving Thermokarst Using High-Temporal-Frequency Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Selawik River, Alaska
title_short Comparing Two Methods of Surface Change Detection on an Evolving Thermokarst Using High-Temporal-Frequency Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Selawik River, Alaska
title_full Comparing Two Methods of Surface Change Detection on an Evolving Thermokarst Using High-Temporal-Frequency Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Selawik River, Alaska
title_fullStr Comparing Two Methods of Surface Change Detection on an Evolving Thermokarst Using High-Temporal-Frequency Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Selawik River, Alaska
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Two Methods of Surface Change Detection on an Evolving Thermokarst Using High-Temporal-Frequency Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Selawik River, Alaska
title_sort comparing two methods of surface change detection on an evolving thermokarst using high-temporal-frequency terrestrial laser scanning, selawik river, alaska
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2013
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5062813
op_coverage agris
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
permafrost
Thermokarst
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
permafrost
Thermokarst
Alaska
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 5; Issue 6; Pages: 2813-2837
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs5062813
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5062813
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 5
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2813
op_container_end_page 2837
_version_ 1774715382321381376