Comparison of Three Methods for Distinguishing Glacier Zones Using Satellite SAR Data

• Published in: Remote Sensing
• Main Authors: Barbara Barzycka, Mariusz Grabiec, Jacek Jania, Małgorzata Błaszczyk, Finnur Pálsson, Michał Laska, Dariusz Ignatiuk, Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023
• Subjects: glacier facies; polarimetry; PolSAR; sigma0; Pauli; H/alpha Wishart; ground penetrating radar; Hornsund; Langjökull; Svalbard; glacier; Ice cap; Iceland; Tidewater
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030690

Changes in glacier zones (e.g., firn, superimposed ice, ice) are good indicators of glacier response to climate change. There are few studies of glacier zone detection by SAR that are focused on more than one ice body and validated by terrestrial data. This study is unique in terms of the dataset collected—four C- and L-band quad-pol satellite SAR images, Ground Penetrating Radar data, shallow glacier cores—and the number of land ice bodies analyzed, namely, three tidewater glaciers in Svalbard and one ice cap in Iceland. The main aim is to assess how well popular methods of SAR analysis perform in distinguishing glacier zones, regardless of factors such as the morphologic differences of the ice bodies, or differences in SAR data. We test and validate three methods of glacier zone detection: (1) Gaussian Mixture Model–Expectation Maximization (GMM-EM) clustering of dual-pol backscattering coefficient (sigma0); (2) GMM-EM of quad-pol Pauli decomposition; and (3) quad-pol H/α Wishart segmentation. The main findings are that the unsupervised classification of both sigma0 and Pauli decomposition are promising methods for distinguishing glacier zones. The former performs better at detecting the firn zone on SAR images, and the latter in the superimposed ice zone. Additionally, C-band SAR data perform better than L-band at detecting firn, but the latter can potentially separate crevasses via the classification of sigma0 or Pauli decomposition. H/α Wishart segmentation resulted in inconsistent results across the tested cases and did not detect crevasses on L-band SAR data.