Differences Evaluation among Three Global Remote Sensing SDL Products

At present, a variety of global remote sensing surface downwelling longwave radiation (SDL) products are used for atmospheric science research; however, there are few studies on the quantitative evaluation of differences among different SDL products. In order to evaluate the differences among differ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Laibo Yu, Guoxiang Liu, Rui Zhang
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174244
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/15/17/4244/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/15/17/4244/ 2023-10-01T03:51:00+02:00 Differences Evaluation among Three Global Remote Sensing SDL Products Laibo Yu Guoxiang Liu Rui Zhang agris 2023-08-29 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174244 eng eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Earth Observation Data https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs15174244 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing Volume 15 Issue 17 Pages: 4244 surface downwelling longwave radiation CERES-SYN ECMWF-SRB GEWEX-SRB Text 2023 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174244 2023-09-03T23:53:45Z At present, a variety of global remote sensing surface downwelling longwave radiation (SDL) products are used for atmospheric science research; however, there are few studies on the quantitative evaluation of differences among different SDL products. In order to evaluate the differences among different SDL products quantitatively, we have selected three commonly used SDL products—Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System-Synoptic Radiative Fluxes and Clouds (CERES-SYN), the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts-Surface Radiation Budget (ECMWF-SRB) and the Global Energy and Water Exchanges Project-Surface Radiation Budget (GEWEX-SRB)—to comprehensively study in this paper. The results show that there are significant differences among the three SDL products in some areas, such as in the Arctic, the Antarctic, the Sahara, the Tibet Plateau, and Greenland. The maximum absolute root mean square error (RMSEab) in these areas is greater than 20 Wm−2, the maximum relative root mean square error (RMSEre) is greater than 20%, the maximum and minimum absolute mean bias error (MBEab) are about 20 Wm−2 and −20 Wm−2, respectively, and the maximum and minimum relative mean bias error (MBEre) are about 10% and −10%, respectively. Among the three SDL products, the difference between the ECMWF-SRB and GEWEX-SRB is the most significant. In addition, this paper also analyzed the differences among different SDL products based on three aspects. Firstly, the differences among the three SDL products show that there is significant seasonality, and the differences among different months may vary greatly. However, the differences are not sensitive to years. Secondly, there are some differences in cloud-forcing radiative fluxes (CFRFs) of different SDL products, which is also an important factor affecting the difference between different SDL products. Finally, in the process of converting high temporal resolution SDL products into monthly SDL products, data processing also affects the difference between different SDL ... Text Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Greenland MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Antarctic The Antarctic Greenland Remote Sensing 15 17 4244
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic surface downwelling longwave radiation
CERES-SYN
ECMWF-SRB
GEWEX-SRB
spellingShingle surface downwelling longwave radiation
CERES-SYN
ECMWF-SRB
GEWEX-SRB
Laibo Yu
Guoxiang Liu
Rui Zhang
Differences Evaluation among Three Global Remote Sensing SDL Products
topic_facet surface downwelling longwave radiation
CERES-SYN
ECMWF-SRB
GEWEX-SRB
description At present, a variety of global remote sensing surface downwelling longwave radiation (SDL) products are used for atmospheric science research; however, there are few studies on the quantitative evaluation of differences among different SDL products. In order to evaluate the differences among different SDL products quantitatively, we have selected three commonly used SDL products—Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System-Synoptic Radiative Fluxes and Clouds (CERES-SYN), the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts-Surface Radiation Budget (ECMWF-SRB) and the Global Energy and Water Exchanges Project-Surface Radiation Budget (GEWEX-SRB)—to comprehensively study in this paper. The results show that there are significant differences among the three SDL products in some areas, such as in the Arctic, the Antarctic, the Sahara, the Tibet Plateau, and Greenland. The maximum absolute root mean square error (RMSEab) in these areas is greater than 20 Wm−2, the maximum relative root mean square error (RMSEre) is greater than 20%, the maximum and minimum absolute mean bias error (MBEab) are about 20 Wm−2 and −20 Wm−2, respectively, and the maximum and minimum relative mean bias error (MBEre) are about 10% and −10%, respectively. Among the three SDL products, the difference between the ECMWF-SRB and GEWEX-SRB is the most significant. In addition, this paper also analyzed the differences among different SDL products based on three aspects. Firstly, the differences among the three SDL products show that there is significant seasonality, and the differences among different months may vary greatly. However, the differences are not sensitive to years. Secondly, there are some differences in cloud-forcing radiative fluxes (CFRFs) of different SDL products, which is also an important factor affecting the difference between different SDL products. Finally, in the process of converting high temporal resolution SDL products into monthly SDL products, data processing also affects the difference between different SDL ...
format Text
author Laibo Yu
Guoxiang Liu
Rui Zhang
author_facet Laibo Yu
Guoxiang Liu
Rui Zhang
author_sort Laibo Yu
title Differences Evaluation among Three Global Remote Sensing SDL Products
title_short Differences Evaluation among Three Global Remote Sensing SDL Products
title_full Differences Evaluation among Three Global Remote Sensing SDL Products
title_fullStr Differences Evaluation among Three Global Remote Sensing SDL Products
title_full_unstemmed Differences Evaluation among Three Global Remote Sensing SDL Products
title_sort differences evaluation among three global remote sensing sdl products
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174244
op_coverage agris
geographic Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
Greenland
geographic_facet Arctic
Antarctic
The Antarctic
Greenland
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Greenland
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Greenland
op_source Remote Sensing
Volume 15
Issue 17
Pages: 4244
op_relation Earth Observation Data
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs15174244
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174244
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 15
container_issue 17
container_start_page 4244
_version_ 1778530433698365440