Comparison of Freshwater Content and Variability in the Arctic Ocean Using Observations and Model Simulations

Freshwater content (FWC), generally characterized in the Arctic Ocean by salinities lower than 34.8 psu, has shifted in both quantity and distribution in recent decades in the Arctic Ocean. This has been largely driven by changes in the volume and salinity of freshwater sources and the direction and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Emma L. Hoffman, Bulusu Subrahmanyam, Corinne B. Trott, Sarah B. Hall
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153715
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/15/15/3715/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/15/15/3715/ 2023-08-20T04:03:29+02:00 Comparison of Freshwater Content and Variability in the Arctic Ocean Using Observations and Model Simulations Emma L. Hoffman Bulusu Subrahmanyam Corinne B. Trott Sarah B. Hall agris 2023-07-25 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153715 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Ocean Remote Sensing https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs15153715 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 15; Issue 15; Pages: 3715 Arctic Ocean Beaufort Gyre freshwater content sea surface salinity sea surface height ocean models ocean reanalysis Text 2023 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153715 2023-08-01T11:00:19Z Freshwater content (FWC), generally characterized in the Arctic Ocean by salinities lower than 34.8 psu, has shifted in both quantity and distribution in recent decades in the Arctic Ocean. This has been largely driven by changes in the volume and salinity of freshwater sources and the direction and magnitude of major currents. In this study, we analyze the variability in FWC and other physical oceanographic variables from 1993 to 2021 in the Arctic Ocean and Beaufort Gyre (BG) using in situ and remote sensing observations and five ocean models and reanalysis products. Generally, ocean models and reanalysis products underestimate FWC in the BG when compared with observations. Modeled FWC and sea surface height (SSH) in the BG are well correlated during the time period and are similar to correlations of the observational data of these variables. ORAS5 compares best to EN4 salinity over the entire study period, although GLORYS12 agrees well pre-2007 and SODA post-2007. Outside the BG, consistency between modeled SSH, FWC, and limited observations varies between models. These comparisons help identify discrepancies in ocean model and reanalysis products while highlighting areas where future improvements are necessary to further our understanding of Arctic FWC. As observations are scarce in the Arctic, these products and their accuracy are important to studying this dynamic and vulnerable ocean. Text Arctic Arctic Ocean MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Arctic Ocean Remote Sensing 15 15 3715
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic Arctic Ocean
Beaufort Gyre
freshwater content
sea surface salinity
sea surface height
ocean models
ocean reanalysis
spellingShingle Arctic Ocean
Beaufort Gyre
freshwater content
sea surface salinity
sea surface height
ocean models
ocean reanalysis
Emma L. Hoffman
Bulusu Subrahmanyam
Corinne B. Trott
Sarah B. Hall
Comparison of Freshwater Content and Variability in the Arctic Ocean Using Observations and Model Simulations
topic_facet Arctic Ocean
Beaufort Gyre
freshwater content
sea surface salinity
sea surface height
ocean models
ocean reanalysis
description Freshwater content (FWC), generally characterized in the Arctic Ocean by salinities lower than 34.8 psu, has shifted in both quantity and distribution in recent decades in the Arctic Ocean. This has been largely driven by changes in the volume and salinity of freshwater sources and the direction and magnitude of major currents. In this study, we analyze the variability in FWC and other physical oceanographic variables from 1993 to 2021 in the Arctic Ocean and Beaufort Gyre (BG) using in situ and remote sensing observations and five ocean models and reanalysis products. Generally, ocean models and reanalysis products underestimate FWC in the BG when compared with observations. Modeled FWC and sea surface height (SSH) in the BG are well correlated during the time period and are similar to correlations of the observational data of these variables. ORAS5 compares best to EN4 salinity over the entire study period, although GLORYS12 agrees well pre-2007 and SODA post-2007. Outside the BG, consistency between modeled SSH, FWC, and limited observations varies between models. These comparisons help identify discrepancies in ocean model and reanalysis products while highlighting areas where future improvements are necessary to further our understanding of Arctic FWC. As observations are scarce in the Arctic, these products and their accuracy are important to studying this dynamic and vulnerable ocean.
format Text
author Emma L. Hoffman
Bulusu Subrahmanyam
Corinne B. Trott
Sarah B. Hall
author_facet Emma L. Hoffman
Bulusu Subrahmanyam
Corinne B. Trott
Sarah B. Hall
author_sort Emma L. Hoffman
title Comparison of Freshwater Content and Variability in the Arctic Ocean Using Observations and Model Simulations
title_short Comparison of Freshwater Content and Variability in the Arctic Ocean Using Observations and Model Simulations
title_full Comparison of Freshwater Content and Variability in the Arctic Ocean Using Observations and Model Simulations
title_fullStr Comparison of Freshwater Content and Variability in the Arctic Ocean Using Observations and Model Simulations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Freshwater Content and Variability in the Arctic Ocean Using Observations and Model Simulations
title_sort comparison of freshwater content and variability in the arctic ocean using observations and model simulations
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153715
op_coverage agris
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 15; Issue 15; Pages: 3715
op_relation Ocean Remote Sensing
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs15153715
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15153715
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 15
container_issue 15
container_start_page 3715
_version_ 1774713866315366400