An Improved Sea Ice Classification Algorithm with Gaofen-3 Dual-Polarization SAR Data Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

• Published in: Remote Sensing
• Main Authors: Jiande Zhang, Wenyi Zhang, Yuxin Hu, Qingwei Chu, Lei Liu
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
• Subjects: sea ice classification; synthetic aperture radar; Gaofen-3; convolutional neural networks; multiscale feature fusion; Arctic; Arctic Ocean; Sea ice
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040906

The distribution of sea ice is one of the major safety hazards for sea navigation. As human activities in polar regions become more frequent, monitoring and forecasting of sea ice are of great significance. In this paper, we use SAR data from the C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) Gaofen-3 satellite in the dual-polarization (VV, VH) fine strip II (FSII) mode of operation to study the Arctic sea ice classification in winter. SAR data we use were taken in the western Arctic Ocean from January to February 2020. We classify the sea ice into four categories, namely new ice (NI), thin first-year ice (tI), thick first-year ice (TI), and old ice (OI), by referring to the ice maps provided by the Canadian Ice Service (CIS). Then, we use the deep learning model MobileNetV3 as the backbone network, input samples of different sizes, and combine the backbone network with multiscale feature fusion methods to build a deep learning model called Multiscale MobileNet (MSMN). Dual-polarization SAR data are used to synthesize pseudocolor images and produce samples of sizes 16 × 16 × 3, 32 × 32 × 3, and 64 × 64 × 3 as input. Ultimately, MSMN can reach over 95% classification accuracy on testing SAR sea ice images. The classification results using only VV polarization or VH polarization data are tested, and it is found that using dual-polarization data could improve the classification accuracy by 10.05% and 9.35%, respectively. When other classification models are trained using the training data from this paper for comparison, the accuracy of MSMN is 4.86% and 1.84% higher on average than that of the model built using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and ResNet18 model, respectively.